/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.3.90 A person tried by a 3-judge pane... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A person tried by a 3-judge panel is declared guilty if at least 2judges cast votes of guilty. Suppose that when the defendant is in fact guilty, each judge will independently vote guilty with probability .7, whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .2. If 70percent of defendants are guilty, compute the conditional probability that judge number 3votes guilty given that

(a) judges 1and 2votes guilty;

(b) judges 1and 2casts 1guilty and 1not guilty vote;

(c) judges 1and 2both cast not guilty votes.

Let Ei,i=1,2,3denote the event that judge i casts a guilty vote. Are these events independent? Are they conditionally independent? Explain

Short Answer

Expert verified

Events Ei are conditionally independent given that the suspect is guilty.

Use Bayes formula in regard to the suspect is, or is not guilty

After calcu膷ating a) and c), b) can be acquired by another Bayes formula, P(E3) being the weighted average of a), b) and c)

a)97142=0.683b)1134=0.324c)45122=0.369

Step by step solution

01

Given Information (part a)

compute the conditional probability that judge number 3 votes guilty given that judges 1 and 2 vote guilty;

02

Explanation (part a)

Events:

G - the suspect is guility

Ei- judgei=1,2,3casts a guilty vote

Probabilities

P(G)=0.7P(Gc)=0.3

P(EiG)=0.7fori{1,2,3}

P(EiGc)=0.2fori{1,2,3}

The eventsE1,E2,E3are independent givenG(orGc)

Otherwise, events E1, E2, E3 are dependent. This can be read from the context of the problem or the fact that the problem is not defined if this is not the case (not all needed probabilities are given).

calculate

a)P(E3E1E2)

b)P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]

c)P(E3E1cE2c)

03

Explanation (part a)

a) Start with the definition

P(E3E1E2)=P(E1E2E3)P(E1E2)

Both probabilities on the right hand side can be calculated using Bayes formula with eventsGandGc

P(E1E2E3)=P(E1E2E3G)P(G)+P(E1E2E3Gc)P(Gc)

P(E1E2)=P(E1E2G)P(G)+P(E1E2Gc)P(Gc)

When conditional independence is applied to this, we obtain

P(E1E2E3)=P(E1G)P(E2G)P(E3G)P(G)+P(E1Gc)P(E2Gc)P(E3Gc)P(Gc)

P(E1E2)=P(E1G)P(E2G)P(G)+P(E1Gc)P(E2Gc)P(Gc)

substituting the known probabilities here the result is:

P(E1E2E3)=0.730.7+0.230.3=0.2425

P(E1E2)=0.720.7+0.220.3=0.355

localid="1648545722244" P(E3E1E2)=97142

=0.683

04

Final Answer (part a)

Judges 1 and 2 vote guilty isP(E3E1E2)=97142=0.683.

05

Given Information (part c)

The conditional probability that, judges 1and2 both cast not guilty votes.

06

Explanation (part c)

The same method as for a)

P(E3E1cE2c)=P(E1cE2cE3)P(E1cE2c)

Bayes formula

P(E1cE2cE3)=P(E1cE2cE3G)P(G)+P(E1cE2cE3Gc)P(Gc)

P(E1cE2c)=P(E1cE2cG)P(G)+P(E1cE2cGc)P(Gc)

Conditional independence givenG(andGc) is applied to this, then, the probabilities are substituted to obtain

P(E1cE2cE3)=(10.7)20.70.7+(10.2)20.20.3=0.0825

P(E1cE2c)=(10.7)20.7+(10.2)20.3=0.255

P(E3E1E2)=1134=0.324localid="1648545962939" P(E3E1E2)=1134=0.3235

07

Final Answer (part c)

The conditional probability that, judges 1and2 both cast not guilty votes.
localid="1648545996450" P(E3E1E2)=1134=0.3235

08

Given Information (part b)

Judges 1and 2cast 1 guilty and 1 not guilty vote;

09

Explanation (part b)

There are many Bayes formulae for calculatingP(E3), two of them are:

P(E3)=P(E3G)P(G)+P(E3Gc)P(Gc)=0.72+0.20.3=0.55

P(E3)=P(E3E1E2)P(E1E2)+P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]P(E1E2cE1cE2)+P(E3E1cE2c)

Conclusion is to equate right hand side in the second equation withP(E3)=0.55

If we first note thatE1E2,E1cE2candE1E2cE1cE2are mutually exclusive, and their union is the whole space, from axiom3

P(E1E2)+P(E1cE2c)+P(E1E2cE1cE2)=1SubstitutionP(E1E2cE1cE2)=0.61

And:

P(E3E1E2)P(E1E2)=P(E3E1E2)=0.2425

P(E3E1cE2c)P(E1cE2c)=P(E3E1cE2c)=0.0825

Now there is only one unknown in equation (2)

0.55=0.2425+P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]0.61+0.0825

From this ,

localid="1648546032593" P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]=451220.369

10

Final Answer (part b)

The conditional probability that, judges 1and 2cast 1guilty and 1not guilty vote is

localid="1648546061166" P[E3(E1E2cE1cE2)]=45122=0.369

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A family has jchildren with probability pj, where localid="1646821951362" p1=.1,p2=.25,p3=.35,p4=.3. A child from this family is randomly chosen. Given that this child is the eldest child in the family, find the conditional probability that the family has

(a) only 1child;

(b) 4children.

Suppose that an ordinary deck of 52cards is shuffled and the cards are then turned over one at a time until the first ace appears. Given that the first ace is the role="math" localid="1647784076635" 20thcard to appear, what is the conditional probability that the card following it is the

  1. ace of spades?
  2. two of the clubs?

A type C battery is in working condition with probability .7, whereas a type D battery is in working condition with probability .4. A battery is randomly chosen from a bin consisting of 8 type C and 6 type D batteries.

(a) What is the probability that the battery works?

(b) Given that the battery does not work, what is the conditional probability that it was a type C battery?

A total of 500 married working couples were polled about their annual salaries, with the following information resulting:

For instance, in 36 of the couples, the wife earned more and the husband earned less than \( 25,000. If one of the couples is randomly chosen, what is

(a) the probability that the husband earns less than \) 25,000 ?

(b) the conditional probability that the wife earns more than \( 25,000 given that the husband earns more than this amount?

(c) the conditional probability that the wife earns more than \) 25,000 given that the husband earns less than this amount?

In Laplace鈥檚 rule of succession (Example 5e), suppose that the first nflips resulted in r heads and nrtails. Show that the probability that the(n+1)flip turns up heads is (r+1)/(n+2). To do so, you will have to prove and use the identity

01yn(1-y)mdy=n!m!(n+m+1)!

Hint: To prove the identity, let C(n,m)=01yn(1-y)mdy. Integrating by parts yields

C(n,m)=mn+1C(n+1,m-1)

Starting with C(n,0)=1/(n+1), prove the identity by induction on m.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.