/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 2.14 Prove Proposition  4.4 by mat... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Prove Proposition4.4by mathematical induction.

Short Answer

Expert verified

To prove the statement fork+1,considering first kevents as one, use Proposition4.3., and then the presumption forktwice.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information.

Given that Proposition4.4.

02

explanation.

We will apply mathematical induction to the number of sets. Forn=2, see Proposition 4.3.Now assume for n=kwe have. PE1∪E2∪…∪Ek=∑i=1kPEi-∑i1<i2PEi1Ei2+…+(-1)r+1∑i1<…<irPEi1…Eir+…+(-1)k+1PE1…Ek

For n=k+1.Set E=E1∪…∪Ekand apply Proposition 4.3.Then we get

PE1∪E2∪…∪Ek∪Ek+1=P(E)+PEk+1-PEEk+1

Using the induction hypothesis we get

PE1∪E2∪…∪Ek+1=PEk+1+∑i=1kPEi-∑i1<i2PEi1Ei2+…+(-1)r+1∑i1<…<irPEi1…Eir+…+(-1)k+1PE1…Ek-PEEk+1

Now observe that

PEEk+1=PE1∪…∪EkEk+1=PE1Ek+1∪…∪EkEk+1=∑i=1kPEiEk+1-∑i1<i2PEi1Ei2Ek+1+…+(-1)r+1∑i1<…<irPEi1…EirEk+1+…+(-1)k+1PE1…EkEk+1

Combining this with the identity above we get

PE1∪E2∪…∪Ek+1=∑i=1k+1PEi-∑i1<i2PEi1Ei2+…+(-1)r+1∑i1<…<irPEi1…Eir+…+(-1)k+2PE1…Ek+1

Hence we get the desired identity by mathematical induction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.