/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 60 The number of times that a perso... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The number of times that a person contracts a cold in a given year is a Poisson random variable with parameter \(\lambda=5 .\) Suppose that a new wonder drug (based on large quantities of vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) ) has just been marketed that reduces the Poisson parameter to \(\lambda=3\) for 75 percent of the population. For the other 25 percent of the population, the drug has no appreciable effect on colds. If an individual tries the drug for a year and has 2 colds in that time, how likely is it that the drug is beneficial for him or her?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The probability that the drug is beneficial for an individual who has 2 colds after taking it for a year is: P(\(\lambda=3\) | 2 colds) = \(\frac{\frac{e^{-3}\cdot3^2}{2!} \cdot 0.75}{\frac{e^{-3}\cdot3^2}{2!} \cdot 0.75 + \frac{e^{-5}\cdot5^2}{2!} \cdot 0.25}\)

Step by step solution

01

Probability with \(\lambda = 3\)

Compute the probability of contracting 2 colds for those with the lower Poisson parameter (\(\lambda=3\)): P(2 colds | \(\lambda=3\)) = \(\frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^k}{k!}\), where \(k=2\) and \(\lambda=3\). P(2 colds | \(\lambda=3\)) = \(\frac{e^{-3}\cdot3^2}{2!}\)
02

Probability with \(\lambda = 5\)

Compute the probability of contracting 2 colds for those with the higher Poisson parameter (\(\lambda=5\)): P(2 colds | \(\lambda=5\)) = \(\frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^k}{k!}\), where \(k=2\) and \(\lambda=5\). P(2 colds | \(\lambda=5\)) = \(\frac{e^{-5}\cdot5^2}{2!}\) #Step 2: Applying Bayes' theorem#
03

Bayes' theorem

Compute the probability that the drug is beneficial, P(\(\lambda=3\) | 2 colds): P(\(\lambda=3\) | 2 colds) = \(\frac{P(2 \text{ colds} | \lambda=3) \cdot P(\lambda=3)}{P(2 \text{ colds})}\) To find P(2 colds), we can use the law of total probability to consider the combined probability of having 2 colds with both \(\lambda=3\) and \(\lambda=5\): P(2 colds) = P(2 colds | \(\lambda=3\))P(\(\lambda=3\)) + P(2 colds | \(\lambda=5\))P(\(\lambda=5\)) We know the probabilities for having \(\lambda=3\) and \(\lambda=5\), which are given as, P(\(\lambda=3\))=0.75 and P(\(\lambda=5\))=0.25. Substitute these values to obtain P(2 colds). #Step 3: Calculate the final probability#
04

Final probability calculation

Substitute the values obtained in the numerator and denominator and calculate P(\(\lambda=3\) | 2 colds): P(\(\lambda=3\) | 2 colds) = \(\frac{P(2 \text{ colds} | \lambda=3) \cdot P(\lambda=3)}{P(2 \text{ colds} | \lambda=3) \cdot P(\lambda=3) + P(2 \text{ colds} | \lambda=5) \cdot P(\lambda=5)}\) The result will provide the probability that the drug is beneficial for an individual who has 2 colds after taking it for a year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory
Probability theory is a crucial aspect of understanding random events and their outcomes. At its core, it deals with the likelihood of different results occurring. In probability theory, events are considered as outcomes of random experiments. Each outcome is assigned a probability, a number between 0 and 1, representing how likely it is to occur.

The Poisson distribution is a notable concept within probability theory, particularly for modeling random events that happen independently over a fixed period. It's typically used when we want to measure the number of times an event occurs in an interval of time. Here, we're examining the number of colds a person catches in a year.

In this context, the Poisson distribution is defined by the parameter \( \lambda \), which is the average number of events (colds) expected in a time frame. The probability of observing \( k \) events is given by the formula:
  • \( P(X=k) = \frac{e^{-\lambda} \lambda^k}{k!} \)
This means the probability of getting exactly two colds (\( k = 2 \)) can be computed with \( \lambda \) values of 3 and 5, respectively, corresponding to whether the drug is effective or not.
Bayes' Theorem
Bayes' Theorem is a fundamental principle in probability theory, providing a way to update our beliefs based on new evidence. It links prior knowledge of an event with new evidence to give a revised probability.

In our exercise, we're trying to determine the probability that the drug is effective given that an individual had 2 colds. To do this, Bayes' Theorem is employed. It helps us relate the probability of an event based on two potential causes—in this case, whether the drug was effective (\( \lambda=3 \)) or not (\( \lambda=5 \))—with what is observed.

Bayes’ Theorem is expressed as:
  • \( P(A|B) = \frac{P(B|A)P(A)}{P(B)} \)
Here, \( P(A|B) \) is the probability that the drug is effective (causing \( \lambda=3 \)) given 2 colds—\( B \) is the recorded evidence, and \( A \) is the condition (the drug being effective). Calculating \( P(\lambda=3 | \text{2 colds}) \) involves multiplying the probability of having 2 colds when the drug is effective by the probability of the drug being effective, and dividing by the total probability of having 2 colds.
Law of Total Probability
The Law of Total Probability extends the basic principles of probability theory. It aids in determining the total probability of an outcome that can occur from multiple causes or states.

In our scenario, the total probability we are interested in is \( P(\text{2 colds}) \), which represents the likelihood of having 2 colds regardless of whether the drug worked or not. The law tells us that this can be calculated by considering both "branches"—\( \lambda=3 \) and \( \lambda=5 \).

The formula is:
  • \( P(2 \text{ colds}) = P(2 \text{ colds} | \lambda=3) \cdot P(\lambda=3) + P(2 \text{ colds} | \lambda=5) \cdot P(\lambda=5) \)
By using this law, we account for all possible scenarios of having 2 colds. This makes our calculations complete and allows us to work out the total probability needed for the Bayesian equation in the previous section. Thus, fundamental to solving this problem is combining these principles to effectively predict the situation's outcome.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that two teams play a series of games that ends when one of them has won \(i\) games. Suppose that each game played is, independently, won by team \(A\) with probability \(p .\) Find the expected number of games that are played when (a) \(i=2\) and (b) \(i=3 .\) Also, show in both cases that this number is maximized when \(p=\frac{1}{2}\).

A gambling book recommends the following "winning strategy" for the game of roulette: Bet \(\$ 1\) on red. If red appears (which has probability \(\frac{18}{38}\) ), then take the \(\$ 1\) profit and quit. If red does not appear and you lose this bet (which has probability \(\frac{20}{38}\) of occurring), make additional \(\$ 1\) bets on red on each of the next two spins of the roulette wheel and then quit. Let \(X\) denote your winnings when you quit. (a) Find \(P\\{X > 0\\}\) (b) Are you convinced that the strategy is indeed a "winning" strategy? Explain your answer! (c) Find \(E[X]\)

Each night different meteorologists give us the probability that it will rain the next day. To judge how well these people predict, we will score each of them as follows: If a meteorologist says that it will rain with probability \(p,\) then he or she will receive a score of \(1-(1-p)^{2} \quad\) if it does rain \(1-p^{2}\) if it does not rain We will then keep track of scores over a certain time span and conclude that the meteorologist with the highest average score is the best predictor of weather. Suppose now that a given meteorologist is aware of our scoring mechanism and wants to maximize his or her expected score. If this person truly believes that it will rain tomorrow with probability \(p^{*},\) what value of \(p\) should he or she assert so as to maximize the expected score?

Suppose that a die is rolled twice. What are the possible values that the following random variables can take on: (a) the maximum value to appear in the two rolls; (b) the minimum value to appear in the two rolls; (c) the sum of the two rolls; (d) the value of the first roll minus the value of the second roll?

There are three highways in the county. The number of daily accidents that occur on these highways are Poisson random variables with respective parameters. \(3, .5,\) and \(.7 .\) Find the expected number of accidents that will happen on any of these highways today.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.