/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 3.25. The following method was p... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

3.25. The following method was proposed to estimate the number of people over the age of 50 who reside in a town of known population 100,000: "As you walk along the streets, keep a running count of the percentage of people you encounter who are over \(50 .\) Do this for a few days; then multiply the percentage you obtain by 100,000 to obtain the estimate." Comment on this method. Hint: Let \(p\) denote the proportion of people in the town who are over \(50 .\) Furthermore, let \(\alpha_{1}\) denote the proportion of time that a person under the age of 50 spends in the streets, and let \(\alpha_{2}\) be the corresponding value for those over \(50 .\) What quantity does the method suggested estimate? When is the estimate approximately equal to \(p ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The proposed method estimates the number of people over the age of 50 by counting the percentage of people encountered on the streets who are over 50 and then multiplying that percentage by the total population of the town. The method's estimate is approximately equal to the true proportion when the proportion of time spent on the streets by people under and over 50 is approximately the same (\(\alpha_1 \approx \alpha_2\)). This means the method is only accurate if both age groups have similar outdoor presence patterns. Otherwise, the estimate could be biased and may not accurately represent the true proportion of people over 50 in the town.

Step by step solution

01

1. Define Variables

First, let's define the variables we'll be working with: - \(p\): The true proportion of people over the age of 50 in the town - \(\alpha_1\): The proportion of time that a person under the age of 50 spends in the streets - \(\alpha_2\): The proportion of time that a person over the age of 50 spends in the streets
02

2. Analyze the Proposed Method

According to the proposed method, we would calculate the percentage of people we encounter on the streets who are over the age of 50 and then multiply that percentage by the total population of the town (100,000). To understand the method better, let's analyze the probability of encountering a person over the age of 50 on the streets, given the definitions of the variables above. We can make use of conditional probability and find \(P(person\ over\ 50\ present\ on\ streets)\), which can be calculated as follows: \(P(person\ over\ 50\ present\ on\ streets) = \frac{P(person\ over\ 50\ and\ person\ present\ on\ streets)}{P(person\ present\ on\ streets)}\) Now we can find the probability on the denominator using the law of total probability: \(P(person\ present\ on\ streets) = P(person\ present\ on\ streets\ |\ person\ over\ 50)P(person\ over\ 50) + P(person\ present\ on\ streets\ |\ person\ under\ 50)P(person\ under\ 50)\)
03

3. Substitute Variables

Now we can substitute the variables defined at the beginning into these probabilities: - \(P(person\ over\ 50)\) = \(p\) - \(P(person\ under\ 50)\) = \(1 - p\) - \(P(person\ present\ on\ streets\ |\ person\ over\ 50)\) = \(\alpha_2\) - \(P(person\ present\ on\ streets\ |\ person\ under\ 50)\) = \(\alpha_1\) Substituting the variables: \(P(person\ over\ 50\ present\ on\ streets) = \frac{\alpha_2 p}{\alpha_2 p + \alpha_1 (1 - p)}\)
04

4. Find the Estimate's Relationship to the True Proportion

The method suggests estimating the number of people over 50 by multiplying the percentage encountered by 100,000, so let's compare this estimate to the true proportion: \(\frac{100,000 \times \alpha_2 p}{\alpha_2 p + \alpha_1 (1 - p)} \approx p \times 100,000\)
05

5. Determine When the Estimate is Approximately Equal to the True Proportion

We want to find when this estimate is approximately equal to the true proportion of people over 50, so we can solve for \(p\) in the following equation: \(100,000 \times \frac{\alpha_2 p}{\alpha_2 p + \alpha_1 (1 - p)} \approx p \times 100,000\) Divide both sides by 100,000: \(\frac{\alpha_2 p}{\alpha_2 p + \alpha_1 (1 - p)} \approx p\) If \(\alpha_1\) is approximately equal to \(\alpha_2\), let's say \(\alpha\), then the equation becomes: \(\frac{\alpha p}{\alpha p + \alpha (1 - p)} \approx p\) \(\frac{p}{p + (1 - p)} \approx p\) \(\frac{p}{1} \approx p\) This result indicates that when \(\alpha_1\) is approximately equal to \(\alpha_2\), i.e., the proportion of time spent on the streets by people under and over 50 is approximately the same, the estimate is approximately equal to the true proportion of people over 50 in the town.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Conditional Probability
Conditional probability is a fundamental concept in probability theory that describes the probability of an event occurring given that another event has already occurred. In essence, it captures the idea that the likelihood of some events can depend on the occurrence of others. For instance, consider the probability of it raining today if we already know that the clouds are dark and heavy. This probability might be higher than the probability of rain with no such knowledge about the clouds.

Applying this notion to our exercise, we encounter the idea of conditional probability when determining the likelihood of meeting a person over the age of 50 on the streets of the town. The method provided in the exercise assumes that the proportion of older people seen on the streets directly reflects the proportion of the older population in the town. However, the method overlooks that the presence of people on the street is conditional upon not only their age but also their habits, schedules, and other variables that could make an appearance on the streets more or less likely.

In practice, the running count of people over 50 met on the streets serves as the numerator in a conditional probability formula, while the total observed street population acts as the denominator. This can result in a biased estimate if, for example, those over the age of 50 are less likely to be out on the streets than younger people due to varying lifestyle patterns. Therefore, for this method to yield an accurate estimation of the population proportion (noted as 'p' in the problem), the street visibility ('alpha values') for both groups under and over 50 should be fairly similar.

Furthermore, when it comes to real-life data collection, measuring the actual street presence accurately is challenging, and the representativeness of these measurements can heavily influence the validity of the probability estimation. This is an illustration of why understanding and correctly applying the principles of conditional probability is so vital, especially in statistical methods such as surveys and opinion polls where bias can easily skew results.
The Law of Total Probability
The law of total probability bridges together conditional probabilities and standalone probabilities, providing a full picture of how likely an event is to occur under various conditions. This law is especially helpful when an event can occur under several disjoint scenarios, and it allows us to calculate the total probability of this event by considering all possible scenarios that could lead to its occurrence.

Translating this to our example, let's think about encountering any person on the street—not specifically whether they are over 50 or not. We would need to take into account all possible groups of people who could be on the street at any given time. Using the law of total probability, we can break this down into the probability of encountering someone over 50 on the street and the probability of encountering someone under 50. We know that the total street population is the sum of these two groups, so we can add their probabilities together—weighted by their respective population proportions—to get the total probability of encountering someone on the street.

This total probability serves as the foundation from which the conditional probability of meeting a person over the age of 50 on the street is calculated. By integrating the law of total probability with the proportion of the population over 50, we get a clearer estimate of the number of such individuals likely to be observed in public spaces. The exercise ultimately shows us that determining the proportion of any subset of a population—like people over 50—must factor in the habits and frequencies of all population subsets, highlighting the interconnectedness of probabilistic events. This method also draws attention to the importance of considering all variables when creating survey methods and cautions against oversimplification.
Understanding the Proportion of the Population
When we speak about the proportion of a population, we are referring to the fraction of the total population that a particular segment of interest makes up. This measure is vital for understanding demographics and making a variety of decisions, from policy-making to business planning. For instance, knowing the proportion of the population that is over the age of 50 can help a town plan its healthcare services and community programs.

In the context of the exercise, 'p' represents the true proportion of the town's population that is over 50. However, the proposed estimation method can lead to significant errors if not implemented with a correct understanding of the factors influencing the visibility of this proportion on the streets. It's crucial to recognize that we may not capture a representative sample if certain segments of the population have different levels of street presence. This discrepancy can stem from varying lifestyle patterns, working hours, mobility restrictions, and other social factors that affect how often different groups appear in public.

To obtain a reliable estimate, the method of sampling must reflect the actual distribution of the population segments. Only when the street presence (or 'alpha values') of both younger and older segments of the town's populace are equivalent, does the approach approximate the true proportion of the population effectively. As such, when conducting surveys or making estimations based on observed samples, recognizing and adjusting for any disproportionate visibility is crucial for accuracy. This exercise subtly teaches the valuable lesson that the proportion of the population is not just about numbers—it's also about the distribution and behavior of people within the population, which must be thoughtfully considered in any method of approximation.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Ms. Aquina has just had a biopsy on a possibly cancerous tumor. Not wanting to spoil a weekend family event, she does not want to hear any bad news in the next few days. But if she tells the doctor to call only if the news is good, then if the doctor does not call, Ms. Aquina can conclude that the news is bad. So, being a student of probability, Ms. Aquina instructs the doctor to flip a coin. If it comes up heads, the doctor is to call if the news is good and not call if the news is bad. If the coin comes up tails, the doctor is not to call. In this way, even if the doctor doesn't call, the news is not necessarily bad. Let \(\alpha\) be the probability that the tumor is cancerous; let \(\beta\) be the conditional probability that the tumor is cancerous given that the doctor does not call. (a) Which should be larger, \(\alpha\) or \(\beta ?\) (b) Find \(\beta\) in terms of \(\alpha,\) and prove your answer in part (a). 3.32. A family has \(j\) children with probability \(p_{j},\) where \(p_{1}=.1, p_{2}=.25, p_{3}=.35, p_{4}=.3 .\) A child from this fam- ily is randomly chosen. Given that this child is the eldest child in the family, find the conditional probability that the family has (a) only 1 child; (b) 4 children. Redo (a) and (b) when the randomly selected child is the youngest child of the family.

All the workers at a certain company drive to work and park in the company's lot. The company is interested in estimating the average number of workers in a car. Which of the following methods will enable the company to estimate this quantity? Explain your answer. 1\. Randomly choose \(n\) workers, find out how many were in the cars in which they were driven, and take the average of the \(n\) values. 2\. Randomly choose \(n\) cars in the lot, find out how many were driven in those cars, and take the average of the \(n\) values.

A certain organism possesses a pair of each of 5 different genes (which we will designate by the first 5 letters of the English alphabet). Each gene appears in 2 forms (which we designate by lowercase and capital letters). The capital letter will be assumed to be the dominant gene, in the sense that if an organism possesses the gene pair \(x X,\) then it will outwardly have the appearance of the \(X\) gene. For instance, if \(X\) stands for brown eyes and \(x\) for blue eyes, then an individual having either gene pair \(X X\) or \(x X\) will have brown eyes, whereas one having gene pair \(x x\) will have blue eyes. The characteristic appearance of an organism is called its phenotype, whereas its genetic constitution is called its genotype. (Thus, 2 organisms with respective genotypes \(a A, b B, c c, d D, e e\) and \(A A, B B, c c,\) \(D D, e e\) would have different genotypes but the same phenotype. In a mating between 2 organisms, each one contributes, at random, one of its gene pairs of each type. The 5 contributions of an organism (one of each of the 5 types) are assumed to be independent and are also independent of the contributions of the organism's mate. In a mating between organisms having genotypes \(a A, b B, c C\) \(d D, e E\) and \(a a, b B, c c, D d, e e\) what is the probability that the progeny will (i) phenotypically and (ii) genotypically resemble (a) the first parent? (b) the second parent? (c) either parent? (d) neither parent?

Suppose that an insurance company classifies people into one of three classes: good risks, average risks, and bad risks. The company's records indicate that the probabilities that good-, average-, and bad-risk persons will be involved in an accident over a 1 -year span are, respectively, .05, .15 and \(30 .\) If 20 percent of the population is a good risk, 50 percent an average risk, and 30 percent a bad risk, what proportion of people have accidents in a fixed year? If policyholder \(A\) had no accidents in \(2012,\) what is the probability that he or she is a good risk? is an average risk?

A deck of cards is shuffled and then divided into two halves of 26 cards each. A card is drawn from one of the halves; it turns out to be an ace. The ace is then placed in the second half-deck. The half is then shuffled, and a card is drawn from it. Compute the probability that this drawn card is an ace. Hint: Condition on whether or not the interchanged card is selected.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.