/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 A certain community is composed ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A certain community is composed of \(m\) families, \(n_{i}\) of which have \(i\) children, \(\sum_{i=1}^{r} n_{i}=m .\) If one of the families is randomly chosen, let \(X\) denote the number of children in that family. If one of the \(\sum_{i=1}^{r}\) in \(_{l}\) children is randomly chosen, let \(Y\) denote the total number of children in the family of that child. Show that \(E[Y] \geq E[X]\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The expected number of children in a family when choosing a child randomly (\(E[Y]\)) is greater than or equal to the expected number of children in a family when choosing a family randomly (\(E[X]\)), as shown below: $$ E[Y] = \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{i*n_i}{\sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i} \geq \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{n_i}{m} = E[X] $$

Step by step solution

01

Probability Mass Function of X

To find the PMF of \(X\), we need to compute the probability that a randomly chosen family has \(i\) children, for \(i=1,2,...,r\). $$P(X=i) = \frac{n_i}{m}$$
02

Expectation of X

Now we can find the expected value of \(X\), using the definition of expectation. The expectation of the number of children in a family when a family is chosen randomly is: $$E[X] = \sum_{i=1}^r i * P(X=i) = \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{n_i}{m}$$
03

Probability Mass Function of Y

To find the PMF of \(Y\), we need to compute the probability that a randomly chosen child comes from a family with \(i\) children, for \(i=1,2,...,r\). $$P(Y=i) = \frac{i*n_i}{\sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i}$$
04

Expectation of Y

Now we can find the expected value of \(Y\), using the definition of expectation. The expectation of the number of children in a family when a child is chosen randomly is: $$E[Y] = \sum_{i=1}^r i * P(Y=i) = \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{i*n_i}{\sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i}$$
05

Comparing E[Y] and E[X]

Let's compare the expressions we found for \(E[Y]\) and \(E[X]\): $$ \begin{aligned} E[Y] &= \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{i*n_i}{\sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i} \\ &E[X] = \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{n_i}{m} \end{aligned} $$ Now, let's multiply both sides by \(m * \sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i\) to cancel out the denominators: $$ \begin{aligned} m * \sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{i*n_i}{\sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i} &\geq m*\sum_{i=1}^r i * \frac{n_i}{m} \\ m * \sum_{i=1}^r i^2 * n_i &\geq \sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i^2 \end{aligned} $$ Observe that \(m * \sum_{i=1}^r i^2 * n_i\) is the sum of squares of all the children in the families weighted by the total number of families (\(m\)), while \(\sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i^2\) is the sum of squares of all the children in the families weighted by the number of families with that particular number of children in each respective family. Since for all values of \(i \geq 1\), \(i^2 \geq i\) and hence also \(m * i^2 \geq i * n_i\) as \(m * i^2\) takes the sum over all families, we can conclude that: $$ m * \sum_{i=1}^r i^2 * n_i \geq \sum_{i=1}^r i*n_i^2 $$ Therefore, we have shown that \(E[Y] \geq E[X]\). This means that the expected number of children in a family when choosing a child randomly is greater than or equal to the expected number of children in a family when choosing a family randomly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Mass Function
Understanding the probability mass function (PMF) is crucial when dealing with discrete random variables. In simple terms, a PMF assigns a probability to each possible outcome of a random variable. For instance, if we're tossing a fair coin, the PMF would assign a probability of 0.5 to both getting a 'heads' and getting a 'tails'.

In the family size distribution context, the PMF helps us calculate the likelihood that a randomly chosen family has a certain number of children. To compute this, we divide the number of families with a particular number of children by the total number of families. This gives us a probability distribution over the family sizes, which is essential for later determining the expected number of children in a randomly selected family or from a child-centric perspective.
Random Variable Expectation
The expectation of a random variable, often symbolized as E[X], is the long-term average value of repetitions of the experiment it represents. It can be thought of as the probability-weighted average of all possible outcomes. For a random variable representing the number of children in a randomly selected family, the expectation is calculated by summing the products of each family size (number of children) and the probability of a family having that size. It's like calculating the average family size, but instead of each family contributing equally to the average, families with more members (children) have more 'weight' in this calculation.

This concept of weighting is the key to understanding why the expected number of children in a family when picking a child (E[Y]) may differ from simply picking a family (E[X]), as larger families have a greater chance of being selected when starting from the child's perspective.
Combinatorics in Probability
Combinatorics, the mathematics of counting, plays a fundamental role in probability, especially when determining the number of ways certain events can occur. In the probability realm, it enables us to figure out the number of possible outcomes that satisfy specific conditions. For instance, if we're looking at the number of ways to form a family with a given number of children from a larger pool, combinatorial methods would be used.

In our family size example, combinatorics isn't used explicitly, but it underpins the reasoning why larger families are more likely to be chosen when selecting a child at random. This is because there are more 'combinations' of children from larger families than from smaller ones, influencing the probability mass function of Y.
Family Size Distribution
The distribution of family sizes within a population can be represented by a frequency distribution, showing how families are distributed across different sizes (number of children). In our context, we explore two types of averages within this distribution: one where we pick families at random, and one where we pick children at random.

The key takeaway is the 'larger family bias' that occurs when picking a child at random—one is more likely to pick a child from a large family than a small family because there are more children from large families to choose from. This result, E[Y] ≥ E[X], is a direct consequence of how the random variable expectation changes depending on whether we approach the problem by looking at families as units or individual children within those families as our starting point.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An interviewer is given a list of potential people she can interview. If the interviewer needs to interview 5 people and if each person (independently) agrees to be interviewed with probability \(\frac{2}{3}\), what is the probability that her list of potential people will enable her to obtain her necessary number of interviews if the list consists of (a) 5 people and (b) 8 people? For part (b) what is the probability that the interviewer will speak to exactly (c) 6 people and (d) 7 people on the list?

A man claims to have extrasensory perception. As a test, a fair coin is flipped 10 times, and the man is asked to predict the outcome in advance. He gets 7 out of 10 correct. What is the probability that he would have done at least this well if he had no ESP?

To determine whether or not they have a certain disease, 100 people are to have their blood tested. However, rather than testing each individual separately, it has been decided first to group the people in groups of \(10 .\) The blood samples of the 10 people in each group will be pooled and anayzed together. If the test is negative, one test will suffice for the 10 people; whereas, if the test is positive each of the 10 people will also be individually tested and, in all, 11 tests will be made on this group. Assume the probability that a person has the disease is .1 for all people, independently of each other, and compute the expected number of tests necessary for each group. (Note that we are assuming that the pooled test will be positive if at least one person in the pool has the disease.)

A satellite system consists of \(n\) components and functions on any given day if at least \(k\) of the \(n\) components function on that day. On a rainy day each of the components independently functions with probability \(p_{1}\), whereas on a dry day they each independently function with probability \(p_{2}\). If the probability of rain tomorrow is \(\alpha\), what is the probability that the satellite system will function?

Suppose that the number of accidents occurring on a highway each day is a Poisson random variable with parameter \(\lambda=3\). (a) Find the probability that 3 or more accidents occur today. (b) Repeat part (a) under the assumption that at least 1 accident occurs today.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.