/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 The author mentions which one of... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The author mentions which one of the following as evidence for the eighteenth- century English attitude toward Parliament? (A) The English had become uncomfortable with institutions that could claim absolute authority. (B) The English realized that their interests were better guarded by Parliament than by the King. (C) The English allowed Parliament to make constitutional changes by legislative enactment. (D) The English felt that the King did not possess the knowledge that would enable him to rule responsibly. (E) The English had decided that it was time to reform their representative government.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct answer is C: The English allowed Parliament to make constitutional changes by legislative enactment.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Question

We need to identify the piece of evidence that the author uses to illustrate the eighteenth-century English attitude toward Parliament among the given options. Each option presents a different historical perspective.
02

Analyze Each Option

Examine each option to determine which one reflects a historical attitude or event regarding Parliament in the 18th century. Think about what evidence could illustrate people's attitudes toward Parliament.
03

Identify Common Themes

Consider the historical context where English attitudes toward Parliament shifted toward favoring constitutional monarchy over absolute monarchy. This checks if one of the options aligns with this change.
04

Match Description with Options

Evaluate which option directly relates to historical facts, such as making constitutional changes, which could serve as evidence for the attitude toward Parliament.
05

Select the Correct Answer

Option C mentions 'constitutional changes by legislative enactment,' indicating that legislative power was acknowledged and utilized in a way that reflects the attitude toward Parliament.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is a vital skill when preparing for exams like the LSAT. Essentially, logical reasoning involves drawing conclusions and making predictions based on a set of premises or pieces of evidence presented in an argument.

In the context of our exercise, the problem demands that you identify what piece of evidence the author uses to illustrate a historical perspective on Parliament. Here, logical reasoning is necessary to evaluate each statement critically. You must not only comprehend the statement but analyze its context and relation to the main question.

When employing logical reasoning, consider each option as a potential piece of evidence. Look at the reasoning behind each option and decide if it follows logically from the historical context provided.
  • Is the statement logically consistent with the time period you are analyzing?
  • Does it offer a clear, reasonable conclusion based on the premises?
  • Does it directly solve what the question is asking for?
By strengthening these reasoning skills, you're sharpening your ability to dissect complex arguments and choose the most logical answer.
Historical Context Analysis
Analyzing historical context is crucial when dealing with questions related to past events and cultural shifts. In our exercise, the correct answer hinges upon an understanding of the English perspective on governmental change during the 18th century.

Historical context analysis involves placing the question within its time period, considering political, social, and cultural climates that might have influenced opinions and actions. For example, during the 18th century, England was moving towards a constitutional monarchy, which implies a certain shift in power dynamics between the monarchy and parliamentary bodies.

Consider why legislative enactment might be seen as a supportive piece of evidence for attitudes toward Parliament.
  • Was there a significant push for more democratic institutions?
  • Was there resistance to authority figures like the monarchy?
  • What significant events might have shaped these views?
By analyzing these aspects, you can place your answer choice in a broader historical context, which can improve your understanding and accuracy in selecting the correct option.
Question-Solving Strategies
Effective question-solving strategies can greatly enhance your ability to handle exercises like the one discussed. These strategies help ensure you efficiently navigate through each option to arrive at the best choice.

One strategy is the process of elimination. By understanding and analyzing the historical and logical foundations of each option, you can discard those that do not connect well with the context or seem out of place. This narrows down your selections, focusing your attention on the most plausible options.

Another strategy is to rephrase the question or the options in your own words. This mental shift can help clarify the question's and the options' meaning. Additionally, it often happens that saying it in your terms makes the core idea stand out more clearly.
  • Draw parallels between each option and historical facts or events.
  • Prioritize understanding over speed to ensure clarity.
  • Review your selection to check if it logically fits the context presented in the question.
Implementing these strategies can empower you to tackle similar questions with confidence and precision.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The incidence in Japan of most types of cancer is remarkably low compared to that in North America, especially considering that Japan has a modern life- style, industrial pollution included. The cancer rates, however, for Japanese people who immigrate to North America and adopt the diet of North Americans approximate the higher cancer rates prevalent in North America. If the statements above are true, they provide the most support for which one of the following? (A) The greater the level of industrial pollution in a country, the higher that country's cancer rate will tend to be. (B) The stress of life in North America is greater than that of life in Japan and predisposes to cancer. (C) The staple foods of the Japanese diet contain elements that cure cancer. (D) The relatively low rate of cancer among people in Japan does not result from a high frequency of a protective genetic trait among Japanese people. (E) The higher cancer rates of Japanese immigrants to North America are caused by fats in the North American diet.

A local group had planned a parade for tomorrow, but city hall has not yet acted on its application for a permit. The group had applied for the permit well in advance, had made sure their application satisfied all the requirements, and was clearly entitled to a permit. Although the law prohibits parades without a permit, the group plans to proceed with its parade. The group's leader defended its decision by appealing to the principle that citizens need not refrain from actions that fail to comply with the law if they have made a good-faith effort to comply but are prevented from doing so by government inaction. Which one of the following actions would be justified by the principle to which the leader of the group appealed in defending the decision to proceed? (A) A chemical-processing company commissioned an environmental impact report on its plant. The report described foul odors emanating from the plant but found no hazardous wastes being produced. Consequently, the plant did not alter its processing practices. (B) A city resident applied for rezoning of her property so that she could build a bowling alley in a residential community. She based her application on the need for recreational facilities in the community. Her application was turned down by the zoning board, so she decided to forego construction. (C) The law requires that no car be operated without a certain amount of insurance coverage. But since the authorities have been unable to design an effective procedure for prosecuting owners of cars that are driven without insurance, many car owners are allowing their insurance to lapse. (D) A real-estate developer obtained a permit to demolish a historic apartment building that had not yet been declared a governmentally protected historic landmark. Despite the protests of citizens' groups, the developer then demolished the building. (E) A physician who had been trained in one country applied for a license to practice medicine in another country. Although he knew he met all the qualifications for this license, he had not yet received it one year after he applied for it. He began to practice medicine without the license in the second country despite the law's requirement for a license.

In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents - rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide. Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll's prediction was inaccurate? (A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents. (B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population. (C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today. (D) No effort was made to determine the respondents' political affiliations. (E) Because the poll asked only for respondents' candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.

Balance is particularly important when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. Facts must not be deliberately manipulated to show one party in a favorable light, and the views of each side should be fairly represented. This concept of balance, however, does not justify concealing or glossing over basic injustices in an effort to be even-handed. If all the media were to adopt such a perverse interpretation of balanced reporting, the public would be given a picture of a world where each party in every conflict had an equal measure of justice on its side, contrary to our experience of life and, indeed, our common sense. Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument? (A) Balanced reporting presents the public with a picture of the world in which all sides to a conflict have equal justification. (B) Balanced reporting requires impartially revealing injustices where they occur no less than fairly presenting the views of each party in a conflict. (C) Our experience of life shows that there are indeed cases in which conflicts arise because of an injustice, with one party clearly in the wrong. (D) Common sense tells us that balance is especially needed when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. (E) Balanced reporting is an ideal that cannot be realized, because judgments of balance are necessarily subjective.

Crimes in which handguns are used are more likely than other crimes to result in fatalities. However, the majority of crimes in which handguns are used do not result in fatalities. Therefore, there is no need to enact laws that address crimes involving handguns as distinct from other crimes. The pattern of flawed reasoning displayed in the argument above most closely resembles that in which one of the following? (A) Overweight people are at higher risk of developing heart disease than other people. However, more than half of all overweight people never develop heart disease. Hence it is unnecessary for physicians to be more careful to emphasize the danger of heart disease to their overweight patients than to their other patients. (B) Many people swim daily in order to stay physically fit. Yet people who swim daily increase their risk of developing ear infections. Hence people who want to remain in good health are better off not following fitness programs that include swimming daily. (C) Most physicians recommend a balanced diet for those who want to remain in good health. Yet many people find that nontraditional dietary regimens such as extended fasting do their health no serious harm. Therefore, there is no need for everyone to avoid nontraditional dietary regimens. (D) Foods rich in cholesterol and fat pose a serious health threat to most people. However, many people are reluctant to give up eating foods that they greatly enjoy. Therefore, people who refuse to give up rich foods need to spend more time exercising than do other people. (E) Many serious health problems are the result of dietary disorders. Yet these disorders are often brought about by psychological factors. Hence people suffering from serious health problems should undergo psychological evaluation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.