/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 The commercial news media emphas... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The commercial news media emphasize exceptional events such as airplane crashes at the expense of those such as automobile accidents, which occur far more frequently and represent a far greater risk to the public. Yet the public tends to interpret the degree of emphasis the news media give to these occurrences as indicating the degree of risk they represent. If the statements above are true, which one of the following conclusions is most strongly supported by them? (A) Print media, such as newspapers and magazines, are a better source of information than are broadcast media. (B) The emphasis given in the commercial news media to major catastrophes is dictated by the public's taste for the extraordinary. (C) Events over which people feel they have no control are generally perceived as more dangerous than those which people feel they can avert or avoid. (D) Where commercial news media constitute the dominant source of information, public perception of risk does not reflect actual risk. (E) A massive outbreak of cholera will be covered more extensively by the news media than will the occurrence of a rarer but less serious disease.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (D) is most strongly supported by the premises.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Premises

The statements indicate that the commercial news media highlight exceptional events over more common ones. This emphasis causes the public to misinterpret the degree of risk associated with different events, as they associate the emphasis with the magnitude of risk.
02

Evaluate the Option Matching Premises

Option (D) states that when commercial news media are the main information source, public perception of risk does not align with actual risk. This aligns with the argument that the media's emphasis skews public perception of risk.
03

Assess Other Options

Option (A) compares different media types, which is not addressed in the premises. Option (B) suggests media choices are driven by public interest, which is not explicitly stated. Option (C) refers to control over events, not emphasis or perception as described. Option (E) focuses on media coverage of diseases, which is a specific case not directly concluded from the premises.
04

Conclusion

Option (D) is supported by the premises, as it summarizes their impact on public perception. The other options either introduce unrelated ideas or are not strongly supported by the given information.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Media Influence
The news media have a profound impact on shaping how we perceive the world. When news outlets focus on extraordinary events like airplane crashes, they do so as they captivate public interest. Such dramatic events are presented at the expense of more frequent incidents, like automobile accidents, which also bear significant risk. This choice in focus and presentation greatly influences how the public understands and reacts to different risks.
Because of this focus, people often underestimate the risks that are less sensational but more common in daily life. For instance, car accidents are statistically far more likely to occur than airplane crashes. However, because crashes make headlines, the public might feel that they represent a greater risk. This highlights the power that media holds in shaping perceived realities through the stories they choose to tell.
Public Perception
Public perception is often molded by what they see and hear in the media. When the news emphasizes extraordinary events, it can lead to a skewed understanding of real-world risks. This phenomenon is not restricted to any single medium; it affects broadcast and print media alike.
This misalignment between perceived and actual risk suggests that when commercial media is the principal source of information, it impacts how people see threats in their lives. For example:
  • Airplane crashes are seen as more dangerous due to intense media coverage, despite being rare.
  • Car accidents, though frequent, are perceived as less risky as they receive less media attention.
Ultimately, this demonstrates the media's role in creating a distorted view of risk, which can impact the public's decision-making and sense of safety.
Risk Assessment
Risk assessment is the process by which individuals evaluate the potential hazards they face. However, media coverage often skews this assessment. People typically rely on media for information about potential dangers, but the emphasis on rare but dramatic events can distort their understanding.
When people equate media emphasis with risk magnitude, they might:
  • Overestimate the threat of dramatic events covered extensively.
  • Underestimate the risk of everyday dangers like car accidents.
This misunderstanding can lead individuals to make poor decisions regarding their safety. Furthermore, policymakers might allocate resources ineffectively when public perception does not align with the actual risks. Therefore, understanding the difference between media portrayals and reality is crucial for accurate risk assessment.
LSAT Preparation
Preparing for the LSAT involves honing various skills, including logical reasoning. Understanding how arguments are structured and the reasoning behind them is key, especially when analyzing media influence and risk perceptions.
The problem associated with media coverage is a typical example of reasoning challenges you'll encounter on the LSAT. To prepare effectively:
  • Practice identifying premises and conclusions in articles.
  • Understand common logical fallacies, like misinterpreting media emphasis as risk indicators.
  • Apply this understanding to answer questions about real-life issues.
By familiarizing yourself with these reasoning patterns, you will improve your ability to think critically and logically, which will be invaluable not just for the LSAT but also in navigating complex real-world media and risk scenarios.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which one of the following studies would provide support for Rubinstein's claims? (A) a study that indicated that many members of the commercial elite in nineteenth-century London had insignificant holdings of real property (B) a study that indicated that, in the nineteenth century, industrialists from the north of England were in fact a target for working-class people (C) a study that indicated that, in nineteenth-century Britain, probate values of goods for sale were not as high as probate values of cash assets (D) a study that indicated that the wealth of nineteenth-century British industrialists did not appear to be significantly greater when the full value of their real property holdings was actually considered (E) a study that indicated that at least some members of the official governing elite in nineteenth-century Britain owned more real property than had previously been thought to be the case

Sabina: The words used in expressing facts affect neither the facts nor the conclusions those facts will support. Moreover, if the words are clearly defined and consistently used, the actual words chosen make no difference to an argument's soundness. Thus, how an argument is expressed can have no bearing on whether it is a good argument. Emile: Badly chosen words can make even the soundest argument a poor one. After all, many words have social and political connotations that influence people's response to claims expressed in those words, regardless of how carefully and explicitly those words are defined. Since whether people will acknowledge a fact is affected by how the fact is expressed, the conclusions they actually draw are also affected. The point at issue between Emile and Sabina is whether (A) defining words in one way rather than another can alter either the facts or the conclusions the facts will justify (B) a word can be defined without taking into account its social and political connotations (C) a sound argument in support of a given conclusion is a better argument than any unsound argument for that same conclusion (D) it would be a good policy to avoid using words that are likely to lead people either to misunderstand the claims being made or to reason badly about those claims (E) a factor that affects neither the truth of an argument's premises nor the logical relation between its premises and its conclusion can cause an argument to be a bad one

Comets do not give off their own light but reflect light from other sources, such as the Sun. Scientists estimate the mass of comets by their brightness: the greater a comet's mass, the more light that comet will reflect. A satellite probe, however, has revealed that the material of which Halley's comet is composed reflects 60 times less light per unit of mass than had been previously thought. The statements above, if true, give the most support to which one of the following? (A) Some comets are composed of material that reflects 60 times more light per unit of mass than the material of which Halley's comet is composed. (B) Previous estimates of the mass of Halley's comet which were based on its brightness were too low. (C) The total amount of light reflected from Halley's comet is less than scientists had previously thought. (D) The reflective properties of the material of which comets are composed vary considerably from comet to comet. (E) Scientists need more information before they can make a good estimate of the mass of Halley's comet.

The initial causes of serious accidents at nuclear power plants have not so far been flaws in the advanced-technology portion of the plants. Rather, the initial causes have been attributed to human error, as when a worker at the Browns Mills reactor in the United States dropped a candle and started a fire, or to flaws in the plumbing, exemplified in a recent incident in Japan. Such everyday events cannot be thought unlikely to occur over the long run. Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above? (A) Now that nuclear power generation has become a part of everyday life, an ever-increasing yearly incidence of serious accidents at the plants can be expected. (B) If nuclear power plants continue in operation, a serious accident at such a plant is not improbable. (C) The likelihood of human error at the operating consoles of nuclear power generators cannot be lessened by thoughtful design of dials, switches, and displays. (D) The design of nuclear power plants attempts to compensate for possible failures of the materials used in their construction. (E) No serious accident will be caused in the future by some flaw in the advanced-technology portion of a nuclear power plant.

In order to control the deer population, a biologist has proposed injecting female deer during breeding season with 10 milligrams of a hormone that would suppress fertility. Critics have charged that the proposal poses health risks to people who might eat the meat of treated deer and thereby ingest unsafe quantities of the hormone. The biologist has responded to these critics by pointing out that humans can ingest up to \(10 \mathrm{mil}-\) ligrams of the hormone a day without any adverse effects, and since no one would eat even one entire deer a day, the treatment would be safe. The biologist's response to critics of the proposal is based on which one of the following assumptions? (A) People would be notified of the time when deer in their area were to be treated with the hormone. (B) The hormone that would be injected into the deer is chemically similar to hormones used in human contraceptives. (C) Hunting season for deer could be scheduled so that it would not coincide with breeding season. (D) The hormone in question does not occur naturally in the female deer that would be injected. (E) Most people do not consider deer meat to be part of their daily diet and eat it only on rare occasions.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.