/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 The consistency of ice cream is ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The consistency of ice cream is adversely affected by even slight temperature changes in the freezer. To counteract this problem, manufacturers add stabilizers to ice cream. Unfortunately, stabilizers, though inexpensive, adversely affect flavor. Stabilizers are less needed if storage temperatures are very low. However, since energy costs are constantly going up, those costs constitute a strong incentive in favor of relatively high storage temperatures. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? (A) Even slight deviations from the proper consistency for ice cream sharply impair its flavor. (B) Cost considerations favor sacrificing consistency over sacrificing flavor. (C) It would not be cost-effective to develop a new device to maintain the constancy of freezer temperatures. (D) Stabilizers function well only at very low freezer temperatures. (E) Very low, stable freezer temperatures allow for the best possible consistency and flavor of ice cream.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Choice E can be properly inferred from the passage.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

The problem involves balancing ice cream consistency, flavor, and cost. Stabilizers are added to maintain consistency but affect flavor. Low temperatures reduce the need for stabilizers but increase energy costs.
02

Analyze the Answer Choices

Each choice represents a potential inference from the passage. We must determine which inference logically follows from the given information.
03

Evaluate Choice A

Choice A suggests that slight deviations affect flavor. While the passage mentions consistency is affected by temperature, it does not explicitly link consistency deviations directly to flavor impairment.
04

Evaluate Choice B

Choice B implies that cost leads to sacrificing consistency over flavor. The passage mentions cost considerations for temperatures, but it does not directly state a preference for consistency over flavor this way.
05

Evaluate Choice C

Choice C posits that developing a new device would not be cost-effective. The passage does not discuss the development cost of such a device, so we cannot infer this.
06

Evaluate Choice D

Choice D suggests that stabilizers work well only at low temperatures. The passage indicates stabilizers are less needed not less effective at low temperatures, so this inference is incorrect.
07

Evaluate Choice E

Choice E suggests low, stable temperatures optimize consistency and flavor. The passage does imply stabilizers are less needed (which could improve flavor) if temperatures are low, supporting this inference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning involves examining information carefully and making connections between different pieces of data to reach a conclusion. In the LSAT, logical reasoning tests your ability to analyze arguments, identify assumptions, and evaluate the strength of evidence.
For example, in our exercise, we have to consider how ice cream consistency, flavor, and cost interact with each other. The passage tells us that stabilizers help maintain consistency but can negatively affect flavor, and that lower temperatures might reduce the need for stabilizers, thus preserving the flavor.
When solving logical reasoning problems:
  • Identify the main argument and supporting premises.
  • Understand how these elements relate to each other.
  • Draw logical inferences from the statements provided.
The goal is to determine what conclusions can be logically supported by the given information, even if not directly stated.
Inference Questions
Inference questions require you to deduce conclusions based on the information provided. They don't ask for what is explicitly stated, but for what must be true if the given information is accurate.
In the ice cream example, we need to infer what is logically supported. Choice E, "Very low, stable freezer temperatures allow for the best possible consistency and flavor of ice cream," aligns with the inference needed. Lower temperatures mean fewer stabilizers, which could enhance flavor and maintain consistency.
To tackle inference questions:
  • Look for key facts within the passage.
  • Consider the implications these facts might have.
  • Don't assume anything beyond what's given.
Inference requires careful reading and an understanding of cause and effect in the context provided.
Analytical Thinking
Analytical thinking is the process of breaking down complex information into smaller, more manageable parts to understand it better. This skill is crucial on the LSAT for solving questions that involve detailed analysis of arguments and scenarios.
In our example, analytical thinking helps us see how different factors like consistency, flavor, stabilizers, and temperature interact. By analyzing these relationships, we can make sound inferences and evaluations.
Engage your analytical thinking by:
  • Breaking down the passage into key components.
  • Looking for logical connections between these components.
  • Assessing how changes in one part (e.g., temperature) affect others (e.g., need for stabilizers).
When you practice analytical thinking, you become better at highlighting crucial details that might not be immediately obvious.
Reading Comprehension
Reading comprehension involves understanding and interpreting written text. It’s a vital skill in LSAT preparation, allowing you to grasp the nuances of complex passages and arguments.
In the ice cream scenario, reading comprehension helps us understand the relationship between temperature, stabilizers, and the quality of ice cream. By carefully reading, we gather that stabilizers are less needed at low temperatures, implying better flavor conservation.
To improve your reading comprehension:
  • Pay attention to keywords and phrases.
  • Summarize each paragraph in your own words as you read.
  • Focus on the author's main point and the implications of supporting details.
By enhancing your reading comprehension skills, you'll be better equipped to handle complex LSAT passages effectively and efficiently.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sheila: Health experts generally agree that smoking a tobacco product for many years is very likely to be harmful to the smoker's health. Tim: On the contrary, smoking has no effect on health at all: although my grandfather smoked three cigars a day from the age of fourteen, he died at age ninety-six. A major weakness of Tim's counterargument is that his counterargument (A) attempts to refute a probabilistic conclusion by claiming the existence of a single counterexample (B) challenges expert opinion on the basis of specific information unavailable to experts in the field (C) describes an individual case that is explicitly discounted as an exception to the experts' conclusion (D) presupposes that longevity and health status are unrelated to each other in the general population (E) tacitly assumes that those health experts who are in agreement on this issue arrived at that agreement independently of one another

The passage suggests that day care is at best a limited solution to the pressures associated with child rearing for all of the following reasons EXCEPT: (A) Even the best day care available cannot guarantee that children will have meaningful time with their parents. (B) Some parents cannot afford day-care services. (C) Working parents sometimes have difficulty finding suitable day care for their children. (D) Parents who send their children to day care still need to provide care for their children during vacations. (E) Even children who are in day care may have to stay home when they are sick.

Famous personalities found guilty of many types of crimes in well-publicized trials are increasingly sentenced to the performance of community service, though unknown defendants convicted of similar crimes almost always serve prison sentences. However, the principle of equality before the law rules out using fame and publicity as relevant considerations in the sentencing of convicted criminals. The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following conclusions? (A) The principle of equality before the law is rigorously applied in only a few types of criminal trials. (B) The number of convicted celebrities sentenced to community service should equal the number of convicted unknown defendants sentenced to community service. (C) The principle of equality before the law can properly be overridden by other principles in some cases. (D) The sentencing of celebrities to community service instead of prison constitutes a violation of the principle of equality before the law in many catses. (E) The principle of equality before the law does not allow for leniency in sentencing.

Harry: Airlines have made it possible for anyone to travel around the world in much less time than was formerly possible. Judith: That is not true. Many flights are too expensive for all but the rich. Judith's response shows that she interprets Harry's statement to imply that (A) the majority of people are rich (B) everyone has an equal right to experience world travel (C) world travel is only possible via routes serviced by airlines (D) most forms of world travel are not affordable for most people (E) anyone can afford to travel long distances by air

Bevex, an artificial sweetener used only in soft drinks, is carcinogenic for mice, but only when it is consumed in very large quantities. To ingest an amount of Bevex equivalent to the amount fed to the mice in the relevant studies, a person would have to drink 25 cans of Bevex-sweetened soft drinks per day. For that reason, Bevex is in fact safe for people. In order for the conclusion that Bevex is safe for people to be properly drawn, which one of the following must be true? (A) Cancer from carcinogenic substances develops more slowly in mice than it does in people. (B) If all food additives that are currently used in foods were tested, some would be found to be carcinogenic for mice. (C) People drink fewer than 25 cans of Bevexsweetened soda per day. (D) People can obtain important health benefits by controlling their weight through the use of artificially sweetened soft drinks. (E) Some of the studies done on Bevex were not relevant to the question of whether or not Bevex is carcinogenic for people.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.