91Ó°ÊÓ

If the public library shared by the adjacent towns of Redville and Glenwood were relocated from the library's current, overcrowded building in central Redville to a larger, available building in central Glenwood, the library would then be within walking distance of a larger number of library users. That is because there are many more people living in central Glenwood than in central Redville, and people generally will walk to the library only if it is located close to their homes. 10\. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? (A) The public library was located between Glenwood and Redville before being moved to its current location in central Redville. (B) The area covered by central Glenwood is approximately the same size as that covered by central Redville. (C) The building that is available in Glenwood is smaller than an alternative building that is available in Redville. (D) Many of the people who use the public library do not live in either Glenwood or Redville. (E) The distance that people currently walk to get to the library is farther than what is generally considered walking distance.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Argument

The argument claims that relocating the library to Glenwood will put it within walking distance for more users. The reasoning is based on the assumption that more people live in Glenwood than Redville, so more people will be able to walk to the library.

02

Identify What Strengthens the Argument

To strengthen the argument, we need to show evidence that supports the benefit of relocating the library to Glenwood in terms of proximity for more users.

03

Analyze Each Option

- Option (A) is irrelevant to the current situation. - Option (B) does not provide new insights to support more users walking. - Option (C) is about building size, irrelevant to user distance. - Option (D) suggests many users are outside the towns, weakening the argument. - Option (E) indicates current walking distance is too far, supporting closer relocation.

04

Select the Best Option

Option (E) strengthens the argument. It shows the current library location requires users to walk farther than normally accepted, implying that moving it closer, as proposed in Glenwood, could indeed benefit more users.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

• Full Textbook Solutions

  Get detailed explanations and key concepts

• Unlimited Al creation

  Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

• Ads-free access

  To over 500 millions flashcards

• Money-back guarantee

  We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Analysis

When working on LSAT logical reasoning problems, understanding the argument thoroughly is crucial. In this particular exercise, the argument hinges on the idea that relocating the library from Redville to Glenwood will make it more accessible to a larger number of people. It's important to notice that the argument is built on the assumption that Glenwood has a higher population density than Redville, thereby increasing the potential number of library users. The analysis involves dissecting this assumption to probe its validity and see if it holds under scrutiny. By questioning whether the premise about population distribution is solid, we can effectively evaluate the strength of the argument. This step involves looking at whether the supposed increase in users aligns with potential reality.

Strengthening an Argument

To strengthen an argument effectively, additional evidence or claims must support or validate the original reasoning. For the exercise at hand, this means finding data or statements that underline the benefit of moving the library. Strengthening the argument involves focusing on the point that relocating the library results in better accessibility for more users due to proximity. Option (E), which mentions that the current library location necessitates longer walks than typically accepted as walking distance, serves this purpose well. It reinforces the idea that moving to Glenwood indeed aligns with reducing the commuting effort for a larger user base. Finding such supportive elements is essential in logical reasoning as it consolidates the proposed logic and addresses any apparent weaknesses or assumptions.

Logical Reasoning Skills

Developing strong logical reasoning skills is fundamental to tackling LSAT questions with success. These skills entail an ability to parse through given information, identify any existing assumptions, and evaluate the strength of conclusions based on provided evidence. In this context, we're tasked with determining how a change in library location affects user access. Logical reasoning requires careful consideration of the premises and how they interact with the conclusion to ensure no gaps are left unaddressed. This involves examining alternative scenarios and whether they could refute or support the central claim. For instance, understanding demographic data from Glenwood and Redville forms the backbone of assessing potential user increase. Through such methodical analysis, you can better assess the validity and strength of arguments in varied contexts.

Relocation Impact Assessment

Relocation impact assessment refers to the evaluation of all potential effects resulting from moving entities, like how relocating the library might affect community access and engagement. In the given LSAT exercise, the focus is on whether moving the library leads to greater access for residents. Assessing relocation impact involves looking at multiple factors, such as demographic differences, geographical advantages, and user convenience. Here, the key impact is more users being able to walk to the library, driven by higher population density in Glenwood. It's essential to systematically analyze these factors to determine if the proposed relocation likely fulfills its intended purpose. This includes considering not just physical distance, but also user habits, transport facilities, and alternative venues, all contributing to comprehensive understanding of the consequences of such a move.