/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.25 How does a credible nominal anch... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

How does a credible nominal anchor help improve the economic outcomes that result from a positive aggregate demand shock? How does a credible nominal anchor help if a negative aggregate supply shock occurs? Use graphs of aggregate supply and demand to demonstrate.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The impact of a credible nominal anchor on the economic results of a positive aggregate demand shock, as well as the impact of a credible nominal anchor on the economic consequences of a negative aggregate supply shock.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Concept of nominal credible anchor

A nominal credible anchor is a system in which a country's credibility is increased by using a fixed exchange rate with gold, silver, or another country's currency (pegging). It is a method designed to lower public expectations of future inflation increases.

02

Step 2. Explanation

The graph depicts a positive demand shock.

As can be seen in the graph above, a positive demand shock causes an increase in demand, which causes the demand curve to move rightward, causing inflation to rise in tandem with the increase in output. Without a credible nominal anchor, a positive demand shock will raise expected inflation, causing the supply curve to collapse and inflation to rise even faster as output falls. However, if there is a credible nominal anchor, expected inflation will remain stable and controlled, and the only increase will be due to the shock, not to changes in supply or public expectations.

03

Step 4. Explanation

The graph depicting a negative aggregate supply shock is as follows:

As can be seen in the graph above, a negative supply shock causes a fall in aggregate supply, which raises inflation and lowers output. Without a credible nominal anchor, projected inflation would rise, but with a credible nominal anchor, expected inflation will remain steady and controlled, and the aggregate supply curve will not shift much. As a result, with a credible nominal anchor, the supply curve will shiftless, resulting in a lower level of inflation.

As a result, the credible nominal anchor helps to reduce projected inflation and keep the rate of inflation under control.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Central banks that engage in inflation targeting usually announce the inflation target and time period for which that target will be relevant. In addition, central bank officials are held accountable for their actions (e.g., they could be fired if the target is not reached), and their success or lack thereof is also public information. Explain why transparency is such a fundamental ingredient of inflation targeting.

Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the core PCE price index (PCEPILFE) and the spot price of a barrel of oil (WTISPLC). For both variables, convert the units setting to "Percent Change from Year Ago, " and download the data from 1960 to the most recent available data.

a. Identify periods in which oil price inflation is 80%or higher.

b. In the periods identified in part (a), how many months was oil price inflation 80% or higher? What was the average core inflation rate during each of those episodes?

c. Based on your answers to parts (a) and (b) above, what can you conclude about the credibility of more recent monetary policy compared to its credibility in the earlier periods?

Suppose two countries have identical aggregate demand curves and potential levels of output, and γis the same in both countries. Assume that in 2019 , both countries are hit with the same negative supply shock. Given the table of values below for inflation in each country, what can you say, if anything, about the credibility of each country's central bank? Explain your answer.

In Japan, the government and central bank have enacted policies recently to raise inflation permanently from persistently low levels, however inflation continues to remain near zero. How, if at all, might credibility of the central bank explain the low inflation persistence?

Suppose the statistical office of a country does a poor job in measuring inflation and reports an annualized inflation rate of 4%for a few months, while the true inflation rate has been 2.5%. What will happen to the central bank's credibility if it is engaged in inflation targeting and its target is around 2%?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.