/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.8 The U.S. economy borrowed heavil... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 2: Q.8 (page 97)

The U.S. economy borrowed heavily from the British in the nineteenth century to build a railroad system. Why did this make both countries better off

Short Answer

Expert verified

Heavy interest rate lead to the improvement in both the nations.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

Trade refers to the exchange of goods, services and funds. In a trade transaction, both the nations are benefited by trade.

02

Step 2. Explanation

The U.S economy made both nations better off because the British were able to obtain high-interest rates by lending to Americans, and were thus benefited. The Americans benefited because railroads infrastructure helped in further economic growth by facilitating the transportation of goods and people.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why do loan sharks worry less about moral hazard in connection with their borrowers than some other lenders do?

Some economists suspect that one of the reasons economies in developing countries grow so slowly is that they do not have well-developed financial markets. Does this argument make sense?

鈥淚n a world without information costs and transaction costs, financial intermediaries would not exist.鈥� Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain your answer.

Describe who issues each of the following money market instruments:

a. Treasury bills

b. Certificates of deposit

c. Commercial paper

d. Repurchase agreement

e. Fed funds

Suppose you have just inherited \(10,400 and are considering the following options for investing the money to maximize your return:

Option 1: Put the money in an interest-bearing checking account that earns 3%. The FDIC insures the account against bank failure.

Option 2: Invest the money in a corporate bond with a stated return of 6%, although there is a 10% chance the company could go bankrupt.

Option 3: Loan the money to one of your friend鈥檚 roommates, Ayesha, at an agreed-upon interest rate of 7%, but you believe there is a 7% chance that she will leave town without repaying you.

Option 4: Hold the money in cash and earn zero return.

a. If you are risk-neutral (that is, neither seek out nor shy away from risk), which of the four options should you choose to maximize your expected return? (Hint: To calculate the expected return of an outcome, multiply the probability that an event will occur by the outcome of that event and then add them up.)

b. Assume that Option 3 and Option 4 are your only choices. If you could pay your friend \)50 to find out extra information about Ayesha that would indicate with certainty whether she will leave town without paying, would you pay the $50? What does this say about the value of better information regarding risk?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

Taxation Economics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.