Chapter 12: Problem 20
What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 12: Problem 20
What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
What is command-and-control environmental regulation?
As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect marginal costs of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not?
Consider two ways of protecting elephants from poachers in African countries. In one approach, the government sets up enormous national parks that have sufficient habitat for elephants to thrive and forbids all local people to enter the parks or to injure either the elephants or their habitat in any way. In a second approach, the government sets up national parks and designates 10 villages around the edges of the park as official tourist centers that become places where tourists can stay and bases for guided tours inside the national park. Consider the different incentives of local villagers—who often are very poor—in each of these plans. Which plan seems more likely to help the elephant population?
In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called "gunk." Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations are chosen. $$ \begin{array}{l|l|l} \hline {\text { Combos }} & \text { Eco Output } & \text { Gunk Cleaned Up } \\\ \hline \mathrm{J} & 800 & 10 \% \\ \hline \mathrm{K} & 500 & 30 \% \\ \hline \mathrm{L} & 600 & 40 \% \\ \hline \mathrm{M} & 400 & 40 \% \\ \hline \mathrm{N} & 100 & 90 \% \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis. b. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? c. Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? d. In the choice between \(\mathrm{K}\) and \(\mathrm{L}\), can you say which one is better and why? e. In the choice between \(\mathrm{K}\) and \(\mathrm{N}\), can you say which one is better, and why? f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-andcontrol environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice \(\mathrm{L}\) or \(\mathrm{M}\) ? Why?
In the tradeoff between economic output and environmental protection, what do the combinations on the protection possibility curve represent?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.