/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 4 In Germany, it takes three worke... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In Germany, it takes three workers to make one television and four workers to make one video camera. In Poland, it takes six workers to make one television and workers to make one video camera.

(a) Who has the absolute advantage in the production of televisions? Who has the absolute advantage in the production of video cameras? How can you tell?

(b) Calculate the opportunity cost of producing one additional television set in Germany and in Poland. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of televisions?

(c) Calculate the opportunity cost of producing one video camera in Germany and in Poland. Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of video cameras?

(d) In this example, is the absolute advantage the same as comparative advantage, or not?

(e) In what product should Germany specialize? In what product should Poland specialize?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Germany has an absolute advantage in the production of televisions and the production of video cameras.

(b) The opportunity cost of producing an additional television in Germany is 4/3 and the opportunity cost of producing an additional television in Poland is 2. Poland has a comparative advantage in production of televisions.

(c) The opportunity cost of producing an additional video camera in Germany is 3/4 the opportunity cost of producing an additional video camera in Poland is 1/2.

Germany has a comparative advantage in the production of video cameras.

(d) In the given example, absolute advantage is not the same as comparative advantage.

(e) Poland should specialize in the production of television and Germany should specialize in the production of video camera.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Meaning of Absolute Advantage. 

Absolute advantage is when one country can use fewer resources to produce a good compared to another country.

02

Step 2. Meaning of Opportunity Cost. 

The forgone benefit that would have been derived from an option not chosen is the opportunity cost.

03

Step 3. Meaning of Comparative Advantage. 

Comparative Advantage is the ability of the given country to produce a specific commodity at a lower cost than their competitors while considering the opportunity cost.

04

Step 4. Part (a). The absolute advantage. 

Germany has an absolute advantage in the production of televisions and the production of video cameras as it takes fewer workers to produce in Germany than in Poland.

05

 Step 5. Part (b). The opportunity cost in the production of television. 

The opportunity cost of producing an additional television in Germany is 4/3 and the opportunity cost of producing an additional television in Poland is 2.

Poland has a comparative advantage in production of televisions.

06

Step 6.  Part (c). The opportunity cost in the production of a video camera.  

The opportunity cost of producing an additional video camera in Germany is 3/4 the opportunity cost of producing an additional video camera in Poland is 1/2.

Germany has a comparative advantage in the production of video cameras.

07

 Step 7. Part (d).  Are absolute advantage and comparative advantage the same. 

In the given example, absolute advantage is not the same as comparative advantage.

08

Step 8.  Part (e).  Specialization of products. 

Poland should specialize in the production of television and Germany should specialize in the production of a video camera.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Look at Table 33.9. Is there a range of trades for which there will be no gains?

What is splitting up the value chain?

How does comparative advantage lead to gains from trade?

If trade increases world GDP by 1% per year, what is the global impact of this increase over 10 years? How does this increase compare to the annual GDP of a country like Sri Lanka? Discuss. Hint: To answer this question, here are steps you may want to consider. Go to the World Development Indicators (online) published by the World Bank. Find the current level of World GDP in constant international dollars. Also, find the GDP of Sri Lanka in constant international dollars. Once you have these two numbers, compute the amount the additional increase in global incomes due to trade and compare that number to Sri Lanka鈥檚 GDP.

Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuela from Table 19.12 which describes how many barrels of oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Use these numbers to answer the rest of this question.

a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Assume there are 100 workers in each country. Canadians and Venezuelans desire both oil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000 tons of lumber. Mark a point on their production possibilities where they can get at least 3,000 tons.

b. Assume that the Canadians specialize completely because they figured out they have a comparative advantage in lumber. They are

willing to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. How much oil should they ask for in return for this lumber to be as well off as they were with no trade? How much should they ask for if they want to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note: We can think of this 鈥渁sk鈥 as the relative price or trade price of lumber.

c. Is the Canadian 鈥渁sk鈥 you identified in (b) also beneficial for Venezuelans? Use the production possibilities frontier graph for Venezuela to show that Venezuelans can gain from trade.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.