/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Give an example of a positive ex... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Give an example of a positive externality and an example of a negative externality.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A positive externality example is vaccinations, which protect not only vaccinated individuals but also those who cannot or have not been vaccinated, leading to an overall decrease in the spread of the disease. This additional benefit experienced by the unvaccinated individuals is the positive externality. A negative externality example is air pollution caused by a factory, which negatively impacts the health of people living nearby and contributes to environmental issues. The factory does not bear the costs associated with these negative impacts, and the additional costs experienced by the affected parties represent the negative externality.

Step by step solution

01

Example of Positive Externality

For a positive externality, we can consider the example of vaccinations. When a large percentage of a population is vaccinated for a contagious disease, it can lead to what is called "herd immunity." This phenomenon protects not only the vaccinated individuals but also those who cannot or have not been vaccinated (e.g., infants, people with compromised immune systems). In this scenario, the benefits of the vaccination extend to the wider population, leading to an overall decrease in the spread of the disease. This additional benefit experienced by the unvaccinated individuals is the positive externality.
02

Example of Negative Externality

For a negative externality, we can consider the example of air pollution caused by a factory. A factory may produce goods for consumers, but in the process, it may also emit harmful pollutants into the atmosphere. These pollutants can have a negative impact on the health of the people living in the surrounding areas and contribute to environmental issues like smog, acid rain, and climate change. The factory doesn't bear the costs associated with these negative impacts, instead, they are borne by the affected individuals and the environment. This additional cost experienced by the unaffected parties is the negative externality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a firm is not a command-and- control approach to reducing pollution. Why?

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of \(10,\) or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(16,\) but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(32,\) which is divided equally between the two countries. a. In Table 12.10 , fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.

What are the three problems that economists have noted with regard to command- and-control regulation?

Table 12.5 provides the supply and demand conditions for a manufacturing firm. The third column represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column represents the supply curve when the firm is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Identify the equilibrium before the social cost of production is included and after the social cost of production is included. $$\begin{array}{l|l|ll}\hline \text { Price } & \begin{array}{l}\text { Quantity } \\\\\text { Demanded }\end{array} &\begin{array}{l}\text { Quantity Supplied without paying } \\\\\text { the cost of the pollution }\end{array} &\begin{array}{c}\text { Quantity Supplied after paying } \\\\\text { the cost of the pollution }\end{array} \\\\\hline \$ 10 &450 & 400 & 250 \\\\\hline \$ 15 & 440 & 440 & 290 \\\\\hline \$ 20 & 430 & 480 & 330 \\\\\hline \$ 25 & 420 & 520 &370 \\\\\hline \$ 30 & 410 & 560 & 410 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$

Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.