Chapter 12: Problem 15
Give an example of a positive externality and an example of a negative externality.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 12: Problem 15
Give an example of a positive externality and an example of a negative externality.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a firm is not a command-and- control approach to reducing pollution. Why?
Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner's dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of \(10,\) or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(16,\) but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of \(32,\) which is divided equally between the two countries. a. In Table 12.10 , fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.
What are the three problems that economists have noted with regard to command- and-control regulation?
Table 12.5 provides the supply and demand conditions for a manufacturing firm. The third column represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column represents the supply curve when the firm is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Identify the equilibrium before the social cost of production is included and after the social cost of production is included. $$\begin{array}{l|l|ll}\hline \text { Price } & \begin{array}{l}\text { Quantity } \\\\\text { Demanded }\end{array} &\begin{array}{l}\text { Quantity Supplied without paying } \\\\\text { the cost of the pollution }\end{array} &\begin{array}{c}\text { Quantity Supplied after paying } \\\\\text { the cost of the pollution }\end{array} \\\\\hline \$ 10 &450 & 400 & 250 \\\\\hline \$ 15 & 440 & 440 & 290 \\\\\hline \$ 20 & 430 & 480 & 330 \\\\\hline \$ 25 & 420 & 520 &370 \\\\\hline \$ 30 & 410 & 560 & 410 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$
Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Why or why not?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.