/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10. A chair manufacturer hires its a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A chair manufacturer hires its assembly-line labor for \(30 an hour and calculates that the rental cost of its machinery is \)15 per hour. Suppose that a chair can be produced using 4 hours of labor or machinery in any combination. If the firm is currently using 3 hours of labor for each hour of machine time, is it minimizing its costs of production? If so, why? If not, how can it improve the situation? Graphically illustrate the isoquant and the two isocost lines for the current combination of labor and capital and for the optimal combination of labor and capital.

Short Answer

Expert verified

No, the firm is not minimizing its costs because the combination of labor and capital is not optimal.

The firm should move to the isocost closer to the origin and use only 4 hours of capital to minimize the cost.

The graph:

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:The production cost at the present combination of inputs

The short-run isocost equation is of the general form TC = rK + wL, where rK is the cost of the capital, and wL is the cost of labor.

The slope of the isocost is:

Slope=-wr

The price for labor per hour is $30 and that for capital per hour is $15.

The isocost equation is:

TC = 30L + 15K

Slope=-3015=-2

Thus, the slope of the isocost is -2.

Also, the slope of a straight line is the ratio of its rise to run. Therefore, the slope of isocost is also given by:

Slope=â–³Kâ–³L

For cost-minimizing,

â–³Kâ–³L=-wr

A combination of 3 units of labor and 1 unit of capital gives the slope of 0.3334, which is not equal to 2 (= -w/r). Thus, the firm does not have minimum costs. It will cost $115 (= 30×3 + 15×1). Thus, the isoquant curve away from the origin will lead to higher costs.

02

Graphical analysis for a cost-minimizing combination of inputs

The slope of an isoquant is equal to the marginal rate of technical substitution. The MRTS is the ratio of marginal productivity of labor to capital.

MRTS=-â–³Kâ–³L

The firm can hire either a maximum of 4 hours of labor or 4 hours of capital at a time. Therefore, the X and Y axes intercepts are 4. Thus, the slope of the isoquant is:

Slope=-44=-1

Hence, the isoquant is a negatively sloped straight line.

As the isoquant curve and the idle isocost line, with slope -2, meet at a combination of 4 units of capital and zero labor units, the firm’s equilibrium lies at (0,4). Thus, the optimal solution for cost-minimizing is (0,4), which will give the minimum cost of $60 (= 30×0 + 15×4).

Thus, the firm will shift to the optimal combination on the isocost line closer to the origin.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

a. Fill in the blanks in the table below.

Units of Output
Fixed Cost
Variable Cost
Total Cost
Marginal Cost
Average Fixed Cost
Average Variable Cost
Average Total Cost
0

100



1

125



2

145



3

157



4

177



5

202



6

236



7

270



8

326



9

398



10

490



b. Draw a graph that shows marginal cost, average variable cost, and average total cost, with cost on the vertical axis and quantity on the horizontal axis.

A computer company’s cost function, which relates its average cost of production AC to its cumulative output in thousands of computers Q and its plant size in terms of thousands of computers produced per year q (within the production range of 10,000 to 50,000 computers), is given by AC = 10 - 0.1Q + 0.3q

  1. Is there a learning-curve effect?

  2. Are there economies or diseconomies of scale?

  3. During its existence, the firm has produced a total of 40,000 computers and is producing 10,000 computers this year. Next year it plans to increase production to 12,000 computers. Will its average cost of production increase or decrease? Explain.

What is the long-run in the microeconomic theory?

You manage a plant that mass-produces engines by teams of workers using assembly machines. The technology is summarized by the production function q = 5KL where q is the number of engines per week, K is the number of assembly machines, and L is the number of labor teams. Each assembly machine rents for r = \(10,000 per week, and each team costs w = \)5000 per week. Engine costs are given by the cost of labor teams and machines, plus $2000 per engine for raw materials. Your plant has a fixed installation of 5 assembly machines as part of its design.

  1. What is the cost function for your plant—namely, how much would it cost to produce q engines? What are average and marginal costs for producing q engines? How do average costs vary with output?

  2. How many teams are required to produce 250 engines? What is the average cost per engine?

  3. You are asked to make recommendations for the design of a new production facility. What capital/ labor (K/L) ratio should the new plant accommodate if it wants to minimize the total cost of producing at any level of output q?

What is the short run in the microeconomic theory?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.