/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q5. A monopolist is deciding how to ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A monopolist is deciding how to allocate output between two geographically separated markets (East Coast and Midwest). Demand and marginal revenue for the two markets are

P1 = 15 鈥 Q1 MR1 = 15 - 2Q1

P2 = 25 - 2Q2 MR2 = 25 - 4Q2

The monopolist鈥檚 total cost is C = 5 + 3(Q1 + Q2). What are price, output, profits, marginal revenues, and deadweight loss (i) if the monopolist can price discriminate? (ii) if the law prohibits charging different prices in the two regions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The output in market 1 will be 6 units at $9, and in market 2 will be 5.5 units at $14. Marginal revenue in market 1 will be $3, and in-market 2 will be $3. The total profit will be $91.50, and the deadweight loss will be $48.25.
  2. The output in market 1 will be 4.33 units, and inmarket 2 will be 7.17 units at $10.67. Marginal revenue in market 1 will be $6.34, and in market 2 will be -$3.68. The total profit will be $82.4, and the deadweight loss will be $44.10.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The optimum level for each market will be when the marginal revenue is equal to Marginal cost.

The price and quantity in the East Coast (Q1) are calculated below:

MR1= 15 - 2Q1MC = 3MR1= MC15 - 2Q1= 32Q1= 12Q1= 6P = 15 - 6= $ 9

In the East Coast, the quantity will be 6 units at $9.

The price and quantity in the Midwest (Q2) are calculated below:

MR2= 25 - 4Q2MC = 3MR2= MC25 - 4Q2= 34Q2= 22Q2= 5.5P = 25 - 25.5= 25 - 11= $ 14

In the Midwest, the quantity will be 5.5 units at $14.

The marginal revenue in both the market is calculated below:

MR1Q1= 6= 15 - 26= 15 - 12= $ 3MR2Q2= 5.5= 25 - 45.5= 25 - 22= $ 3

The marginal revenue in both markets will be $3.

The total profit is calculated below:

=96+145.5-5+311.5=54+77-5-34.5=$91.5

The total profit will be $91.5.

The deadweight loss will be DWL = 0.5 (QC-QM)(PM- PC). The QC and PC represent quantity and price of competitive market; QM and PM represent quantity and price of monopoly market. In the competitive market, the PC = MC is optimal; thus, the price will be $3 in a competitive market, and the quantity at this price in market 1 will be 12 units, and in market 2 will be 11 units.

The total deadweight loss is calculated below:

role="math" localid="1644382519200" DWL1=0.512-69-3=0.566=$18DWL2=0.511-5.514-3=0.55.511=$30.25TotalDWL=18+30.25=$48.25

The total deadweight loss will be $48.25.

02

Explanation for part (b)

The total demand curve will be:

Q1= 15 -P1Q2= 12.5 - 0.5P2Q =Q1+Q2= 15 -P1+ 12.5 - 0.5P2Q = 27.5 - 1.5PP = 18.33 - 0.67Q

The quantity and price at the optimum level are calculated below:

TR = 18.33Q - 0.67Q2MR = 18.33 - 1.33QMC = 3MR = MC18.33 - 1.33Q = 31.33Q = 15.33Q = 11.5P = 18.33 - 0.6711.5= 18.33 - 7.7= $ 10.6

At $10.6, the quantity in each market will be:

Q1= 15 - 10.6= 4.4Q2= 12.5 - 0.510.6= 12.5 - 5.3= 7.2

Output in market 1 will be 4.4 units, and in market 2 will be 7.2 units.

The total profit is calculated below:

=10.611.5-5-311.5=121.9-5-34.5=$82.4

The total profit will be $82.4.

The total deadweight loss is calculated below:

DWL1=0.510.6-312-4.3=0.57.67.7=$29.26DWL2=0.510.6-311-7.2=0.57.63.8=$14.44TotalDWL=29.26+14.44=$43.7

The total deadweight loss will be $43.7.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If the demand for drive-in movies is more elastic for couples than for single individuals, it will be optimal for theaters to charge one admission fee for the driver of the car and an extra fee for passengers. True or false? Explain.

Price discrimination requires the ability to sort customers and the ability to prevent arbitrage. Explain how the following can function as price discrimination schemes and discuss both sorting and arbitrage:

  1. Requiring airline travelers to spend at least one Saturday night away from home to qualify for a low fare.

  2. Insisting on delivering cement to buyers and basing prices on buyers鈥 locations.

  3. Selling food processors along with coupons that can be sent to the manufacturer for a $10 rebate.

  4. Offering temporary price cuts on bathroom tissue.

  5. Charging high-income patients more than low-income patients for plastic surgery

As the owner of the only tennis club in an isolated wealthy community, you must decide on membership dues and fees for court time. There are two types of tennis players. 鈥淪erious鈥 players have demand

Q1 - 10 - P

where Q1 is court hours per week and P is the fee per hour for each individual player. There are also 鈥渙ccasional鈥 players with demand

Q2 = 4 - 0.25P

Assume that there are 1000 players of each type. Because you have plenty of courts, the marginal cost of court time is zero. You have fixed costs of $10,000 per week. Serious and occasional players look alike, so you must charge them the same prices.

  1. Suppose that to maintain a 鈥減rofessional鈥 atmosphere, you want to limit membership to serious players. How should you set the annual membership dues and court fees (assume 52 weeks per year) to maximize profits, keeping in mind the constraint that only serious players choose to join? What would profits be (per week)?
  2. A friend tells you that you could make greater profits by encouraging both types of players to join. Is your friend right? What annual dues and court fees would maximize weekly profits? What would these profits be?
  3. Suppose that over the years, young, upwardly mobile professionals move to your community, all of whom are serious players. You believe there are now 3000 serious players and 1000 occasional players. Would it still be profitable to cater to the occasional player? What would be the profit-maximizing annual dues and court fees? What would profits be per week?

Many retail video stores offer two alternative plans for renting films:

鈥 A two-part tariff: Pay an annual membership fee (e.g., \(40) and then pay a small fee for the daily rental of each film (e.g., \)2 per film per day).

鈥 A straight rental fee: Pay no membership fee, but pay a higher daily rental fee (e.g., $4 per film per day).

What is the logic behind the two-part tariff in this case? Why offer the customer a choice of two plans rather than simply a two-part tariff?

You are an executive for Super Computer, Inc. (SC), which rents out supercomputers. SC receives a fixed rental payment per time period in exchange for the right to unlimited computing at a rate of P cents per second. SC has two types of potential customers of equal number鈥10 businesses and 10 academic institutions. Each business customer has the demand function Q = 10 - P, where Q is in millions of seconds per month; each academic institution has the demand Q = 8 - P. The marginal cost to SC of additional computing is 2 cents per second, regardless of volume.

  1. Suppose that you could separate business and academic customers. What rental fee and usage fee would you charge each group? What would be your profits?
  2. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a zero rental fee. What usage fee would maximize your profits? What would be your profits?
  3. Suppose you set up one two-part tariff鈥攖hat is, you set one rental and one usage fee that both business and academic customers pay. What usage and rental fees would you set? What would be your profits? Explain why the price would not be equal to marginal cost.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.