/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q13. Some years ago, an article appea... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Some years ago, an article appeared in the New York Times about IBM鈥檚 pricing policy. The previous day,IBM had announced major price cuts on most of itssmall and medium-sized computers. The article said:

IBM probably has no choice but to cut prices periodicallyto get its customers to purchase moreand lease less. If they succeed, this could makelife more difficult for IBM鈥檚 major competitors.Outright purchases of computers are needed for ever larger IBM revenues and profits, says Morgan Stanley鈥檚 Ulric Weil in his new book, InformationSystems in the 80鈥檚. Mr. Weil declares that IBM cannot revert to an emphasis on leasing.

a. Provide a brief but clear argument in support of the claim that IBM should try 鈥渢o get its customers to purchase more and lease less.鈥

b. Provide a brief but clear argument against this claim.

c. What factors determine whether leasing or selling is preferable for a company like IBM? Explain briefly.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. It will increase the revenue of IBM.

  2. IBM will lose those consumers who could pay the lease price but not the total price of the computer.

  3. The knowledge of demand and consumers reservation prices for computers determine whether leasing or selling is preferable.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Argument in support of the claim

The claim states that IBM should cut prices of its computers periodically so that more consumers can afford to buy them. If IBM does this, its revenue will increase with each computer sold in the market. It can improve the demand for its computers by systematically abolishing the lease of computers to its potential consumers.

The decreased availability of computers for lease will compel consumers to purchase computers and continue their work. The decrease in the price of small and medium-sized computers will allow more consumers to buy them. Both the decisions will increase the number of computers sold by IBM in the market. The market share will increase along with the revenue.

02

Step 2. Argument against the claim

The article suggests decreased leasing of computers. If IBM decides to cancel this system, it will lose those consumers who can afford the lease price but not the buying price of computers. IBM may end up decreasing its demand in the market.

03

Step 3. Factors that will determine the preferable pricing decision

  • Knowledge of demand:Before deciding to go for a lease pricing strategy or selling strategy, IBM should try to gain all the possible knowledge regarding the demand for computers in the market. It will help the company to know about its potential consumers.

The company will be able to price discriminate between consumers with the help of 'knowledge about demand' and earn a maximum profit under different pricing policies.

  • Reservation price of consumers for computers:The company should conduct surveys and adopt several other methods to measure the reservation price of its consumers. It will help the company categorize the consumers based on their reservation prices.

It can then decide about both strategies' overall benefit (lease or sell).

The above factors will help IBM judge the preferable system of providing computers to its consumers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Look again at Figure 11.12 (p. 434), which shows the reservation prices of three consumers for two goods.

Assuming that marginal production cost is zero for both goods, can the producer make the most money by selling the goods separately, by using pure bundling, or by using mixed bundling? What prices should be charged?

Price discrimination requires the ability to sort customers and the ability to prevent arbitrage. Explain how the following can function as price discrimination schemes and discuss both sorting and arbitrage:

  1. Requiring airline travelers to spend at least one Saturday night away from home to qualify for a low fare.

  2. Insisting on delivering cement to buyers and basing prices on buyers鈥 locations.

  3. Selling food processors along with coupons that can be sent to the manufacturer for a $10 rebate.

  4. Offering temporary price cuts on bathroom tissue.

  5. Charging high-income patients more than low-income patients for plastic surgery

In Example 11.1 (page 422), we saw how producers of processed foods and related consumer goods use coupons as a means of price discrimination. Although coupons are widely used in the United States, that is not the case in other countries. In Germany, coupons are illegal.

  1. Does prohibiting the use of coupons in Germany make German consumers better off or worse off?

  2. Does prohibiting the use of coupons make German producers better off or worse off?

You are an executive for Super Computer, Inc. (SC), which rents out supercomputers. SC receives a fixed rental payment per time period in exchange for the right to unlimited computing at a rate of P cents per second. SC has two types of potential customers of equal number鈥10 businesses and 10 academic institutions. Each business customer has the demand function Q = 10 - P, where Q is in millions of seconds per month; each academic institution has the demand Q = 8 - P. The marginal cost to SC of additional computing is 2 cents per second, regardless of volume.

  1. Suppose that you could separate business and academic customers. What rental fee and usage fee would you charge each group? What would be your profits?
  2. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a zero rental fee. What usage fee would maximize your profits? What would be your profits?
  3. Suppose you set up one two-part tariff鈥攖hat is, you set one rental and one usage fee that both business and academic customers pay. What usage and rental fees would you set? What would be your profits? Explain why the price would not be equal to marginal cost.

A cable TV company offers, in addition to its basic service, two products: a Sports Channel (Product 1) and a Movie Channel (Product 2). Subscribers to the basic service can subscribe to these additional services individually at the monthly prices P1 and P2, respectively, or they can buy the two as a bundle for the price PB, where PB 6 P1 + P2. They can also forgo the additional services and simply buy the basic service. The company鈥檚 marginal cost for these additional services is zero. Through market research, the cable company has estimated the reservation prices for these two services for a representative group of consumers in the company鈥檚 service area. These reservation prices are plotted (as x鈥檚) in Figure 11.21, as are the prices P1, P2, and PB that the cable company is currently charging. The graph is divided into regions I, II, III, and IV.

a. Which products, if any, will be purchased by the consumers in region I? In region II? In region III? In region IV? Explain briefly.

b. Note that as drawn in the figure, the reservation prices for the Sports Channel and the Movie Channel are negatively correlated. Why would you, or why would you not, expect consumers鈥 reservation prices for cable TV channels to be negatively correlated?

c. The company鈥檚 vice president has said: 鈥淏ecause the marginal cost of providing an additional channel is zero, mixed bundling offers no advantage over pure bundling. Our profits would be just as high if we offered the Sports Channel and the

Movie Channel together as a bundle, and only as a bundle.鈥 Do you agree or disagree? Explain why.

d. Suppose the cable company continues to use mixed bundling to sell these two services. Based on the distribution of reservation prices shown in Figure 11.21, do you think the cable company should alter any of the prices that it is now charging? If so, how?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.