/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Perry the picker has stumbled ac... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Perry the picker has stumbled across a piece of pottery in an antique shop. Because of its style, he believes it might be by Frog Woman, a famous Hopi artist. If he buys the pot for \(\$ 3,000\), he will be able to resell it for \(\$ 4,500\), provided it is a genuine Frog Woman pot. If it is not genuine, he will be forced to unload it for only \(\$ 1,000\). Perry estimates that there is a $$2 / 3$$ chance the pot is genuine. a. If Pemy bases his decision on expected monetary value, should he buy the pot? b. Perry's utility depends on his wealth: Specifically, \(U=W^{1 / 4}\) Compute Perry's utility at the possible levels of final wealth he might experience. c. If Perry bases his decision to buy on expected utility, what should he do? d. Suppose Perry spends a little bit too much time in the hotel bar, and buys the pot without doing the math first. At breakfast the next moming, Penny, another picker, notices the pot and decides to make an offer for it. What is the minimum Penny would have to offer to convince Perry to sell. (Remember - Perry still doesn't know whether the pot is genuine; an offer from Penny removes all risk.) e. What is Perry's risk premium?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Yes, according to EMV. b. Genuine: 5.28, not genuine: 0. c. Don't buy according to expected utility. d. Minimum offer is $3153.76. e. Risk premium is $179.57.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Expected Monetary Value (EMV)

Determine the expected monetary value for Perry based on the probabilities and potential resale values provided. The formula is: \( \text{EMV} = (\text{Probability of Genuine}) \times (\text{Resale Value if Genuine}) + (\text{Probability of Not Genuine}) \times (\text{Resale Value if Not Genuine}) \). Substitute the given values: \( \text{EMV} = \left( \frac{2}{3} \right) \times 4500 + \left( \frac{1}{3} \right) \times 1000 \). Calculating gives: \( \text{EMV} = 3000 + 333.33 = 3333.33 \). Since the EMV of 3333.33 is greater than the purchase cost of 3000, Perry should buy the pot based on EMV.
02

Compute Perry's Utility for Different Wealth Levels

Calculate Perry's utility for each possible outcome based on his utility function \( U = W^{1/4} \). For wealth when genuine: \( U = (W_i + 4500 - 3000)^{1/4} \) and when not genuine: \( U = (W_i + 1000 - 3000)^{1/4} \). Without initial wealth \( W_i \), simplify as for genuine \( U = 1500^{1/4} \approx 5.27864 \), and not genuine \( U = -2000^{1/4} \), which is not defined hence stop at zero.
03

Calculate Expected Utility

Find the expected utility \( EU \) using \( EU = \frac{2}{3} \times 1500^{1/4} + \frac{1}{3} \times U_{not genuine} \). Since when not genuine, \( U = 0 \), the expected utility simplifies to \( EU = \frac{2}{3} \times 5.27864 + \frac{1}{3} \times 0 = 3.519 \approx 3.52 \). Compare with utility of keeping the money: \( 3000^{1/4} \approx 8.18 \). Since 3.52 < 8.18, based on expected utility Perry should not buy the pot.
04

Determine Minimum Offer from Penny

Perry should accept an offer that provides utility equal to the expected utility if he kept the money. Thus, solve \( U = W_{min}^{1/4} = 3.52 \). Solving for \( W_{min} = 3.52^4 \), gives approximately \( W_{min} = 153.76 \). Add original purchase loss: \( 3000 + 153.76 = 3153.76 \). Penny should offer a minimum of 3153.76.
05

Calculate Perry's Risk Premium

The risk premium is the difference between the expected monetary value and the certainty equivalent (minimum offer from Penny after adjusted for zero risk). \( RP = 3333.33 - 3153.76 = 179.57 \). The risk premium Perry derives for purchasing the pot is 179.57.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Risk Premium
The risk premium is an important concept when making decisions under uncertainty, especially within the framework of Expected Utility Theory. It represents the amount of money that a person is willing to forgo in order to avoid risk. In simpler terms, it's the difference between the expected monetary value (EMV) of a risky venture and the amount a person would accept if offered a risk-free alternative.

For Perry, the pot's expected monetary value is calculated to be \(3333.33\) dollars. However, when considering the minimal offer he would accept from another picker to eliminate all risk, it turns out to be \(3153.76\) dollars. This difference of \(179.57\) dollars is Perry's risk premium. It essentially quantifies how much he values certainty over the potential fluctuations of outcome.

In practical terms, understanding the risk premium allows individuals to make informed choices by weighing the benefits of potentially higher, yet uncertain, returns against the appeal of a more predictable, guaranteed payoff.
Expected Monetary Value
Expected Monetary Value (EMV) is a fundamental tool used to evaluate decisions involving uncertainty. It provides a way to compute the average outcome of a decision when there are various possible outcomes each with their associated probabilities.

For Perry's decision on whether to buy the pottery, EMV is determined by considering the possible financial outcome if the pot is a genuine Frog Woman piece and if it's not. The formula used is:
  • EMV = (Probability of Genuine) \(\times\) (Resale Value if Genuine) + (Probability of Not Genuine) \(\times\) (Resale Value if Not Genuine)
Plugging in Perry's data:
  • EMV = \(\left( \frac{2}{3} \right) \times 4500 + \left( \frac{1}{3} \right) \times 1000 = 3000 + 333.33 = 3333.33\)
Since this EMV is higher than the purchase price of \(3000\) dollars, EMV suggests that Perry should proceed with the purchase if he bases his decision on potential monetary gain. This calculation highlights how EMV objectively informs whether potential financial gains justify the purchase price.
Utility Function
A utility function measures the satisfaction or happiness derived from different levels of wealth or consumption, reflecting an individual's preference under uncertainty. Perry's utility function is given by \(U = W^{1/4}\), implying that as wealth increases, his utility increases at a diminishing rate.

To analyze Perry's decisions using utility, we assess his satisfaction from possible outcomes:

- For the genuine pot sale, his utility becomes \(U = 1500^{1/4} \approx 5.27864\) when considering initial and resale values.
- For a non-genuine pot, however, the utility calculation becomes problematic, but ultimately simplifies to zero because negative values are undefined in this context.

This utility approach helps Perry evaluate his decision based not on just potential monetary gains but also on his personal satisfaction tied to his final wealth. It recognizes that financial decisions are not always linear and highlights how wealth increments can affect personal utility differently.
Decision Making under Uncertainty
Making choices when facing uncertain outcomes is a common and challenging aspect of decision-making in economics. Perry faces this challenge with his potential pottery purchase.

With the use of Expected Utility Theory, Perry evaluates his options by considering both potential monetary outcomes and his personal utility derived from these outcomes. In uncertain environments, decision-making involves balancing potential benefits against risks, often requiring one to decide between maximizing financial gain and ensuring personal satisfaction.

The process involves the use of:
  • Expected Monetary Value (EMV): to assess potential financial outcomes.
  • Utility Function: to account for personal satisfaction and diminishing returns of increased wealth.
  • Risk Premium: to determine how much certainty is valued over potential risk.
Using these elements, Perry realizes that while his EMV suggests buying the pot, the utility approach discourages it due to a lower expected utility compared to holding onto his money. It underscores that decision-making isn’t just about potential profits, but also personal risk tolerance and satisfaction from outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Danielle is a farmer with a utility function of $$U=I^{0.5}$$ , where \(U\) is Danielle's utility and \(I\) is her income. If the weather is good, she will earn \(\$ 100,000\). If there is a hailstorm, she will earn only \(\$ 50,000\). The probability of a hailstorm in any given year is \(30 \%\). a. What is Danielle's expected income if she is uninsured? Her expected utility? b. Suppose a crop insurer makes the following offer to Danielle: In years when there is no hailstorm, Danielle pays the insurer \(\$ 16,000 .\) In years when there is a hailstorm, the insurer pays Danielle \(\$ 34,000 .\) What is Danielle's expected income? Her expected utility? c. Comment on the following statement, referring to your answers to parts (a) and (b): "The insurance agreement in (b) reduces Danielle's expected income. Therefore, it must make her worse off." d. Suppose instead the insurer offers Danielle the following: In years when there is no hailstorm, Danielle pays the insurer \(\$ 10,000 ;\) in years when there is a hailstorm, the insurer pays Danielle \(\$ 20,000 .\) How does Danielle's expected income and expected utility compare to the uninsured outcome in (a) and the insured outcome in (b)?

Speedy Steve is a traveling salesman. His utility function is given by $$U=I^{0.5}$$, where \(U\) is his utility and \(I\) is his income. Steve's income is \(\$ 900\) each week, but if Steve is caught speeding while making his rounds, he will receive a hefty fine. There is a \(50 \%\) chance he will be caught speeding in any given week and pay a fine of \(\$ 500\). a. Calculate Steve's expected income and expected utility. b. Suppose that Steve's boss offers him a position in online sales that eliminates the risk of being caught speeding. What salary would provide Steve with the same utility he expected to receive as a traveling salesman? c. Suppose instead that Steve was given the opportunity to purchase speeding ticket insurance that would pay all of his fines. What is the most Steve would be willing to pay to obtain this insurance? Explain how you arrived at this number. d. If the company issuing the insurance referred to in (c) convinces Steve to pay the amount you indicated, will the insurer earn a profit? If so, how much profit will it eam?

You are currently driving a gas-guzzling Oldsmobuick that you expect to be able to drive for the next five years. A recent spike in gas prices to \(\$ 5\) per gallon has you considering a trade to a fuel-efficient hybrid Prius. Your Oldsmobuick has no resale value and gets 15 miles per gallon. A new Prius costs \(\$ 25,000\) and gets 45 miles per gallon. You drive 10,000 miles each year. a. Calculate your annual fuel expenditures for the Prius and the Oldsmobuick. b. Assume that the interest rate is \(7 \% .\) Calculate the present value of your costs if you continue to drive the Oldsmobuick for another five years. Assume that you purchase a new Prius at the end of the fifth year, and that a Prius still costs \(\$ 25,000\). Also assume that fuel is paid for at the end of each year. (Carry out your cost calculations for only five years.) c. Calculate the present value of your costs if you purchase a new Prius today. Again, carry out your cost calculations for only five years. d. Based on your answers to (b) and (c), should you buy a Prius now, or should you wait for five years? e. Would your answer change if your Oldsmobuick got 30 miles per gallon instead of \(15 ?\)

You are writing the great American novel and have signed a contract with the world's most prestigious publisher. To keep you on schedule, the publisher promises you a \(\$ 100,000\) bonus when the first draft is complete, and another \(\$ 100,000\) following revisions. You believe that you can write the first draft in a year and have the revisions done at the end of the second year. a. If interest rates are \(5 \%,\) what is the value today of the publisher's future payments? b. Suppose the publisher offers you \(\$ 80,000\) after the first draft and \(\$ 125,000\) following revisions. Is this a better deal than the original offer?

Imagine that you have \(\$ 100\) of ill-gotten gains stashed in an offshore bank account. Lest the IRS get too nosey, you plan to leave that account idle until your retirement in 45 years. a. If your bank pays you \(3 \%\) annual interest, what will your account balance be upon retirement? b. If your bank pays you \(6 \%\) interest, what will your account balance be upon retirement? c. Does doubling the interest rate double your accumulated balance at retirement? More than double it? Less? Explain your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.