Suppose that the inverse market demand for pumpkins is given by \(P=\$ 10-0.05
Q\) Pumpkins can be grown by anyone at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 1\)
a. If there are lots of pumpkin growers in town so that the pumpkin industry
is competitive, how many pumpkins will be sold, and what price will they sell
for?
b. Suppose that a freak weather event wipes out the pumpkins of all but two
producers, Linus and Lucy. Both Linus and Lucy produced bumper crops and have
more than enough pumpkins available to satisfy the demand at even a zero
price. If Linus and Lucy collude to generate monopoly profits, how many
pumpkins will they sell, and what
price will they sell for?
c. Suppose that the predominant form of competition in the pumpkin industry is
price competition. In other words, suppose that Linus and Lucy are Bertrand
competitors. What will be the final price of pumpkins in this marketin other
words, what is the Bertrand equilibrium price?
d. At the Bertrand equilibrium price, what will be the final quantity of
pumpkins sold by both Linus and Lucy individually, and for the industry as a
whole? How profitable will Linus and Lucy be?
e. Would the results you found in parts (c) and (d) be likely to hold if Linus
let it be known that his pumpkins were the most orange in town, and Lucy let
it be known that hers were the tastiest? Explain.
\(f\). Would the results you found in parts (c) and
(d) hold if Linus could grow pumpkins at a marginal cost of \(\$ 0.95 ?\)