/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 A few years ago, a new online in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A few years ago, a new online insurer appeared. Found at www.ticketfree.org, the insurer offered, for a price, up to \(\$ 500\) of coverage against speeding tickets. a. Who has more valuable information in this potential transaction, the buyer of speeding ticket insurance or the seller? b. Explain why the existence of information asymmetries creates an adverse selection problem in the market for speeding ticket insurance. c. What is likely to happen to the behavior of both faster and slower drivers once they have purchased speeding ticket insurance? What is this kind of problem called? d. Ticketfree.org is no longer in operation. Use your answers to (b) and (c) to explain why.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The buyer knows more about their driving habits, leading to adverse selection. Insurance can cause moral hazard, encouraging riskier driving. These dynamics likely drove ticketfree.org out of business.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Information Asymmetry

In any potential market transaction, the party with more valuable and specific information tends to be at an advantage. In this case, the buyer of speeding ticket insurance has more personal information about their driving habits and how often they speed compared to the seller who relies on generalized data about speeding risks.
02

Identifying Adverse Selection

Adverse selection is a situation where buyers have more information about their risk level than sellers. In the market for speeding ticket insurance, individuals who know they are high-risk drivers (more likely to speed) are more inclined to purchase insurance, which could mean insurers end up with mostly high-risk clients, potentially leading to higher loss ratios.
03

Anticipating Changes in Behavior

Once drivers purchase speeding ticket insurance, knowing they have financial protection against speeding tickets, they might drive recklessly or faster than usual. This is known as moral hazard, where having insurance may lead to riskier behavior because the consequences are partially absorbed by the insurer.
04

Evaluating Business Outcome

The insurer Ticketfree.org ended up struggling as the market was affected by adverse selection and moral hazard problems, making it difficult to sustain operations. With mostly high-risk clients (adverse selection) and increased reckless driving (moral hazard), the cost of covering speeding tickets likely surpassed the insurance premiums collected.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Adverse Selection
Adverse selection occurs when one party in a transaction holds more relevant information than the other, leading to an imbalanced market. In an insurance scenario, the buyers possess personal insights about their behavior, such as driving habits. This isn't just a case of them knowing more; it's about knowing something crucial that the seller doesn't. When it comes to speeding ticket insurance, drivers aware of their tendency to speed or being a high-risk do not hesitate to buy insurance.
  • This results in insurers attracting mainly high-risk drivers.
  • The pool of insured individuals is skewed, leading to insurance companies facing potentially more claims than anticipated.
  • Premiums may need to rise to cover these anticipated losses.
Adverse selection does not just affect pricing but can endanger the very viability of an insurance offering. In our example, Ticketfree.org had to deal with adverse selection, which likely led to financial strain.
Moral Hazard
Moral Hazard arises after a transaction has been made, particularly involving insurance. This concept highlights a change in behavior once someone is covered by insurance, leading to riskier actions due to the safety net provided. In speeding ticket insurance, drivers might feel emboldened to break speeding laws, as they aren't directly responsible for the financial penalties.
  • Drivers drive faster as their personal financial risk is decreased.
  • This shift is particularly problematic for insurers because it increases the likelihood and frequency of claims.
  • Insurers may find themselves covering expenses more frequently than planned, potentially driving up costs.
Moral hazard can severely handicap an insurance business, especially one like Ticketfree.org, which offered coverage for finite, yet common and tempting violations such as speeding tickets.
Insurance Market Dynamics
Understanding insurance market dynamics involves recognizing how adverse selection and moral hazard interplay to affect the sustainability of an insurance product. Speeding ticket insurance particularly highlights these dynamics, as insurers need to balance risk while setting attractive premiums.
  • Adverse selection ensures high-risk drivers predominantly fill the subscriber pool.
  • Moral hazard means these insured drivers now have reduced deterrents against speeding.
  • This combination inflates claims for the insurer, leading to financial imbalances.
Ticketfree.org, despite offering a novel insurance product, struggled with these fundamental market dynamics. The high rate of claims and inadequate premium pricing likely resulted in financial instability, making it unsustainable to continue operations. This highlights how the core issues of adverse selection and moral hazard can influence the longevity and success of insurance businesses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many health and casualty insurance policies require policyholders to pay a certain amount (called a deductible) for claims before the insurer itself will begin to pay. a. Explain how the existence of a deductible reduces the problems of moral hazard. b. Often, insurers will let policyholders choose a low deductible, or will offer them a larger deductible in exchange for a substantial reduction in the premium. Explain how this two-tiered system helps insurers deal with the problem of adverse selection.

After a probationary period of six years, during which they teach, research, and serve on committees, university professors who meet acceptable standards are given tenure. Tenure offers these professors tremendous job security. a. Explain why a tenure system makes universities susceptible to a moral hazard problem. b. Explain why the problems of moral hazard caused by tenure are likely to be greater than the problems of adverse selection.

Toyota regularly takes its own cars in trade for new models. It then subjects them to a rigorous inspection process, fixing defects as it goes, and offers them for sale with an extended warranty. Explain how these procedures help Toyota deal with the adverse selection problem.

You have decided to produce a line of moisturewicking skateboarding clothes. You're a wonderful designer, but a lousy tailor, and as a result, you decide to hire your roommate (who is a wonderful seamstress) to produce the clothes for you. Is it better for you to pay your roommate by the hour or to pay by the garment? Explain.

To assist in ensuring adequate and affordable health care for all, the federal government has mandated that health insurers provide health insurance to all, regardless of their physical condition. Insurers may not reject coverage for preexisting health problems. a. Explain why this mandate, standing alone, creates tremendous potential for adverse selection problems. b. A second part of recent health-care reforms is a mandate that every person must either obtain insurance through his employer or through the private market. Explain how this mandate reduces (i) adverse selection problems in general and (ii) the adverse selection problems discussed in part (a) in particular.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.