/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Many health and casualty insuran... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Many health and casualty insurance policies require policyholders to pay a certain amount (called a deductible) for claims before the insurer itself will begin to pay. a. Explain how the existence of a deductible reduces the problems of moral hazard. b. Often, insurers will let policyholders choose a low deductible, or will offer them a larger deductible in exchange for a substantial reduction in the premium. Explain how this two-tiered system helps insurers deal with the problem of adverse selection.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Deductibles reduce moral hazard by making policyholders share in loss costs. Different deductible options help insurers mitigate adverse selection by allowing for self-selection among policyholders.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Moral Hazard

A moral hazard in insurance arises when individuals take more risks because they know that they are protected by insurance. For example, someone might drive carelessly if they know any damage will be covered.
02

Role of Deductibles in Reducing Moral Hazard

A deductible requires policyholders to pay a portion of their claims out of pocket. This means that the policyholders still bear some of the cost from their risky behaviors, discouraging excessive risk-taking and thereby reducing moral hazard.
03

Understanding Adverse Selection

Adverse selection occurs when individuals with a higher risk of needing insurance are more likely to purchase it, leading to potential financial losses for the insurer.
04

Low and High Deductible Options

Insurers often offer a choice: a low deductible with a higher premium, or a high deductible with a lower premium. This allows individuals to self-select based on their own risk levels.
05

Mitigating Adverse Selection

Those willing to choose a higher deductible often perceive themselves as less risky, which can help insurers separate high-risk individuals (who prefer lower deductibles) from low-risk individuals, thereby addressing adverse selection.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Moral Hazard
Moral hazard in insurance is an interesting phenomenon where the presence of insurance coverage might actually lead to an increase in risky behavior. This is because individuals feel more secure knowing they have a safety net. For example, a person might drive more recklessly if they know that their car insurance will cover any potential damages from an accident. This increased risk-taking is what we call moral hazard.

Insurance companies use deductibles to combat this issue. A deductible is an amount that the policyholder must pay out of pocket before the insurance policy kicks in to cover additional costs. By having to pay this initial amount, individuals are less likely to engage in risky behavior because they directly bear some responsibility for the costs incurred.
  • Deductibles encourage policyholders to be more cautious.
  • They help keep premiums lower by reducing unnecessary claims.
  • This balancing act helps maintain a sustainable insurance system.
Adverse Selection
Adverse selection is a challenge insurers face when individuals with higher risks are more likely to apply for insurance than those with lower risks. Imagine a scenario where individuals who are more prone to illness are the ones predominantly purchasing health insurance. This can lead to higher healthcare costs for insurers.

One common solution for adverse selection is the two-tiered deductible system. Insurers often offer both low and high deductible options, allowing policyholders to choose based on their personal assessment of risk. Those who opt for higher deductibles usually perceive themselves to be at a lower risk of making claims.
  • High-deductible plans attract lower-risk individuals.
  • Low-deductible plans appeal to those expecting more frequent claims.
  • This self-selection helps insurers manage costs more effectively.
By allowing policyholders to choose, insurers can better differentiate between high-risk and low-risk customers and adjust pricing and coverage accordingly.
Risk Management
Risk management is an essential strategy in insurance that aims to mitigate potential losses and ensure the long-term sustainability of insurance providers. Insurers use various tools, like deductibles and premium strategies, to manage these risks effectively.

By implementing deductibles, insurers encourage policyholders to consider their personal risk and reduce the occurrence of minor claims. This is crucial because:
  • It keeps the overall costs for the insurer lower.
  • It allows insurers to allocate resources for significant claims.
  • It promotes shared responsibility between the insurer and the insured.
Effective risk management enables insurers to maintain affordable premiums while still providing comprehensive coverage. By striking this balance, they can remain financially sound while satisfying their clientele.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the 1960s Yale University began offering students an alternative to taking out student loans. Instead, students could attend Yale in exchange for a specified percentage of their earnings over a significant length of time. Yale used historical data to determine the percentage so that the program would pay for itself-large payments from high earners would offset the smaller payments from low earners. a. If you were planning on becoming a Wall Street financier, would you be more likely to take out loans or enroll in the Yale program? Why? b. If you were planning on becoming a missionary, would you be more likely to take out loans or enroll in the Yale program? Why? c. The tuition program turned out to be a financial disaster for Yale. Do your answers to (a) and (b) shed light on why? Explain. d. What kind of information problem did the Yale program suffer from?

In an isolated town, there are two distinct markets for cars. Buyers will pay up to \(\$ 12,000\) for a highquality car or \(\$ 8,000\) for a low-quality car. There are 100 high-quality cars for sale, and the sellers have a minimum acceptable price of \(\$ 11,000\). There are also 100 low-quality cars for sale at a minimum acceptable price of \(\$ 5,000\). The supply of automobiles is perfectly inelastic above the reservation price. a. If there is perfect information, how many high quality and how many low- quality cars will be sold? b. Suppose that the quality of a car is known to the seller, but not to the buyer. What price will prevail in the marketplace if buyers correctly estimate the chance of acquiring a low-quality car at \(50 \% ?\) What happens to the number of high-quality cars for sale at that price? c. After sellers make all adjustments, what will the equilibrium price of cars be? What proportion of those cars will be high-quality cars? d. What happens to your answers to (a), \((\mathrm{b})\), and (c) if sellers of high-quality cars have a reservation price of \(\$ 9,500\) instead of \(\$ 11,000 ?\)

After a probationary period of six years, during which they teach, research, and serve on committees, university professors who meet acceptable standards are given tenure. Tenure offers these professors tremendous job security. a. Explain why a tenure system makes universities susceptible to a moral hazard problem. b. Explain why the problems of moral hazard caused by tenure are likely to be greater than the problems of adverse selection.

You have decided to produce a line of moisturewicking skateboarding clothes. You're a wonderful designer, but a lousy tailor, and as a result, you decide to hire your roommate (who is a wonderful seamstress) to produce the clothes for you. Is it better for you to pay your roommate by the hour or to pay by the garment? Explain.

Princess Buttercup has a multitude of potential suitors. She wishes to separate them into two groups - those who are truly interested in her hand in marriage, and those who are only interested because she's convenient, pretty, and rich. Let's call these two groups "interested" and "nonchalant," respectively. In an attempt to separate the two groups, Princess Buttercup devises a plan under which potential suitors must slay dragons before coming to the castle to court her. \- Those who slay the requisite number of dragons, \(\bar{D},\) will be allowed to court her. \- Those who do not slay the requisite number of dragons will only be allowed to court Princess Buttercup's ugly half-sister, Princess Poison Ivy. To a member of either group, the benefit to courting Princess Buttercup is equal to \(\$ 1,000\). \- To a member of either group, the benefit to courting Princess Poison Ivy is \$64. To a member of the "interested" group, who pursue their goal with unbridled passion, the cost of passing Princess Buttercup's test is given as \(D^{2}\), where \(D\) is the number of dragons slain. To a member of the "nonchalant" group, who pursue their goal halfheartedly, the cost of passing Princess Buttercup's test is given as \(D^{3}\), where \(D\) is the number of dragons slain. a. Princess Buttercup wants to sort the interested suitors from the nonchalant suitors. What is the minimum number of dragons Princess Buttercup can ask potential suitors to slay if she wants them to separate into groups? (You can round to an appropriatei nteger.) b. Suppose that Princess Buttercup asks suitors to slay three fewer dragons than you indicated in your answer to (a). Why will asking suitors to slay this many dragons not help Princess Buttercup filter out the nonchalant suitors? c. What is the maximum number of dragons Princess Buttercup can ask potential suitors to slay if she wants to be able to distinguish between interested and nonchalant suitors? (Again, you may round your answer to an appropriate integer.) d. Suppose that Princess Buttercup asks potential suitors to slay three more dragons than you indicated in your answer to (c). Why will asking suitors to slay this many dragons not help Princess Buttercup filter out the nonchalant suitors? e. Suppose that Princess Buttercup has appropriately set the number of dragons, filtered out the nonchalant suitors, and chosen her prince from the pool of interested suitors. Now, she wishes to see if her prince wants her because of love, or whether her prince is only interested given her vast fortune. What modern American legal device might Princess Buttercup use as a screening tactic to discover the true answer? Explain your response.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.