/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 When competition between firms i... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

When competition between firms is based on quantities (Cournot competition), the reaction functions we derive tell us that when Firm A increases its output, Firm B's best response is to cut its own. However, when competition between firms is based on price (Bertrand competition), reaction functions tell us that Firm B's response to a cut in Firm A's price (which will lead to an increase in the quantity \(\mathrm{A}\) sells) should be a corresponding cut in B's price (and a corresponding increase in its own output). Reconcile these two results.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Cournot and Bertrand competitions differ by strategic focus: quantity versus price. This focus determines firms' reaction functions and their competitive responses.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Key Concepts

First, let's understand the two types of competition: Cournot and Bertrand. In Cournot competition, firms compete by choosing quantities, assuming other firms' quantities are fixed. In Bertrand competition, firms compete by choosing prices, assuming other firms' prices are fixed.
02

Analyze Cournot Competition

In Cournot competition, if Firm A increases its output, it essentially increases the total market supply, leading to a decrease in market price. Firm B, aiming to maximize its profit, will reduce its output since increasing supply further would reduce prices and hurt its profit margin. This response forms the basis of Firm B's reaction function: a decrease in its own output when Firm A increases its output.
03

Analyze Bertrand Competition

In Bertrand competition, firms assume competitors' prices will not change. If Firm A lowers its price, it captures a greater market share since customers prefer lower prices. To maintain competitiveness, Firm B will lower its price as well, leading to an increased quantity sold at a lower price. This reaction function implies that when Firm A reduces its price, Firm B also reduces its price to remain competitive.
04

Reconcile the Differences

The difference in responses is due to the type of competition leverage - quantity versus price. In Cournot, firms are sensitive to output levels affecting prices indirectly, while in Bertrand, firms directly compete on price, and this immediately affects market demand and firm output. The strategic variable (quantity vs price) determines the action each firm takes in response to its competitor's changes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Cournot Competition
Cournot competition is a model where firms compete by selecting the quantity of output they will produce. Each firm assumes the quantities set by their competitors will remain constant, so they focus on deciding the optimal quantity that maximizes their own profits. Consider the following points about Cournot:
  • Assumptions: Firms decide simultaneously without knowing their competitors' choices.
  • Focuses on quantities: The primary strategic variable is how much to produce.
  • Market influence: An increase in one firm's output can lower the market price, prompting other firms to adjust their strategies.
Each firm's decision impacts the market. If Firm A increases its quantity, it decreases the overall market price. Then, Firm B may reduce its output to protect its profit margins. This forms the reaction function, which is the relationship between one firm’s quantity and the optimal quantity choice for another firm.
Bertrand Competition
In contrast to Cournot, Bertrand competition involves firms competing on price rather than quantity. Each firm assumes its competitors' prices are fixed and strategically sets its own price accordingly. Here are some key features:
  • Assumptions: Firms choose prices simultaneously and try to undercut each other.
  • Price as a strategic variable: Competing firms direct their focus on the price levels.
  • Direct impact on sales: Lower prices attract more customers and lead to increased sales volume.
When Firm A reduces its price, it becomes more attractive to consumers, capturing a larger market share. In response, Firm B would likely cut its price, aiming to retain customers. This adjustment reflects their reaction function in Bertrand competition, where firms continuously adapt their pricing strategies to maintain competitiveness.
Reaction Functions
The concept of reaction functions is crucial in understanding both Cournot and Bertrand competitions. A reaction function shows how one firm adjusts its strategic variable (either price or quantity) in response to its competitor's actions. Important points include:
  • In Cournot competition: The reaction function reveals how quantity adjustments by one firm lead other firms to change their quantities.
  • In Bertrand competition: The reaction function indicates how a price cut by one firm prompts corresponding price adjustments by others.
  • Utility: Reaction functions help predict the market equilibrium based on different competitive strategies.
Essentially, these functions represent the optimal response strategies firms use in either form of competition, providing insights into expected market behaviors under various scenarios.
Market Strategies
Understanding market strategies within an industrial organization context is vital for firms to navigate competitive markets effectively. Here’s how these strategies manifest:
  • Strategic focus: In Cournot, firms prioritize optimizing output, while in Bertrand, the focus shifts to pricing dynamics.
  • Adaptability: Firms must be flexible and ready to adjust their strategies based on competitors' actions and market conditions.
  • Equilibrium attainment: Both Cournot and Bertrand competitions work toward finding a market equilibrium where firms neither gain by unilaterally changing their output or price.
The choice between Cournot and Bertrand fundamentally alters a firm's strategic landscape. By understanding these strategies, firms can better position themselves to achieve competitive advantages and succeed in diverse market environments. This adaptability is key to thriving in complex industrial settings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

August and Francois are the only sellers of sparkling water at a market in a small, rural French town. They obtain their sparkling water for free from wells in their backyards and transport it to the market in wheelbarrows; neither has access to motorized transportation. Identify the type of oligopoly (Cournot, Bertrand, Stackelberg) that is the best fit for each situation below, and explain your reasoning: a. August and Francois both live four hours' walk from the market. b. August and Francois both live half a block from the market. c. August lives a long walk away, but is an early riser who always arrives at 8: 00 a.M.; Francois lives quite close and never shows until 8: 30 .

When competition between firms is based on quantities (Cournot competition), the reaction functions we derive tell us that when Firm A increases its output, Firm B's best response is to cut its own. However, when competition between firms is based on price (Bertrand competition), reaction functions tell us that Firm B's response to a cut in Firm A's price (which will lead to an increase in the quantity \(\mathrm{A}\) sells) should be a corresponding cut in B's price (and a corresponding increase in its own output). Reconcile these two results.

Because cooking soufflés is incredibly difficult, the supply of soufflés in a small French town is controlled by two bakers, Gaston and Pierre. The demand for soufflés is given by \(P=30-2 Q\), and the marginal and average total cost of producing soufflés is \(\$ 6\). Because baking a soufflé requires a great deal of work and preparation, each morning Gaston and Pierre make a binding decision about how many soufflés to bake. a. Suppose that Pierre and Gaston agree to collude, evenly splitting the output a monopolist would make and charging the monopoly price. i. Derive the equation for the monopolist's marginal revenue curve. ii. Determine the profit-maximizing collective output for the cartel. iii. Determine the price Pierre and Gaston will be able to charge. iv. Determine profits for Pierre and Gaston individually, as well as for the cartel as a whole. b. Suppose that Pierre cheats on the cartel agreement by baking one extra soufflé each morning. i. What does the extra production do to the price of soufflés in the marketplace? ii. Calculate Pierre's profit. How much did he gain by cheating? iii. Calculate Gaston's profit. How much did Pierre's cheating cost him? iv. How much potential profit does the group lose as a result of Pierre's cheating? c. Suppose that Gaston, fed up with Pierre's behavior, also begins baking one extra soufflé each morning. i. How does the extra production affect the price of soufflés in the marketplace? ii. Calculate Gaston's profit. How much did he gain by cheating? iii. Calculate Pierre's profit. How much did Gaston's cheating cost him? iv. How much potential profit does the group lose as a result of Pierre's and Gaston's cheating? v. Demonstrate that it is in neither Pierre's nor Gaston's best interest to cheat further on their agreement.

Suppose that the inverse market demand for pumpkins is given by \(P=\$ 10-0.05 Q .\) Pumpkins can be grown by anybody at a constant marginal cost of \(\$ 1\). a. If there are lots of pumpkin growers in town so that the pumpkin industry is competitive, how many pumpkins will be sold, and what price will they sell for? b. Suppose that a freak weather event wipes out the pumpkins of all but two producers, Linus and Lucy. Both Linus and Lucy have produced bumper crops, and have more than enough pumpkins available to satisfy the demand at even a zero price. If Linus and Lucy collude to generate monopoly profits, how many pumpkins will they sell, and what price will they sell for? c. Suppose that the predominant form of competition in the pumpkin industry is price competition. In other words, suppose that Linus and Lucy are Bertrand competitors. What will be the final price of pumpkins in this market \(-\) in other words, what is the Bertrand equilibrium price? d. At the Bertrand equilibrium price, what will be the final quantity of pumpkins sold by both Linus and Lucy individually, and for the industry as a whole? How profitable will Linus and Lucy be? e. Would the results you found in parts (c) and (d) be likely to hold if Linus let it be known that his pumpkins were the most orange in town, and Lucy let it be known that hers were the tastiest? Explain. f. Would the results you found in parts (c) and (d) hold if Linus could grow pumpkins at a marginal cost of \(\$ 0.95 ?\)

Internet users in a small Colorado town can access the Web in two ways: via their television cable or via a digital subscriber line (DSL) from their telephone company. The cable and telephone companies are Bertrand competitors, but because changing providers is slightly costly (waiting for the cable repairman can eat up at least small amounts of time!), customers have some slight resistance to switching from one to another. The demand for cable Internet services is given by \(q_{C}=100-3 p_{C}+2 p_{T}\) where \(q_{c}\) is the number of cable Internet subscribers in town, \(p_{C}\) is the monthly price of cable Internet service, and \(p_{T}\) is the price of a DSL line from the telephone company. The demand for DSL Internet service is similarly given by \(q_{T}=100-3 p_{T}+2 p_{C}\). Assume that both sellers can produce broadband service at zero marginal cost. a. Derive the cable company's reaction curve. Your answer should express \(p_{C}\) as a function of \(p_{T}\) b. Derive the telephone company's reaction curve. Your answer should express \(p_{T}\) as a function of \(p_{C}\) c. Combine reaction functions to determine the price each competitor should charge. Then determine each competitor's quantity and profits, assuming that the average total costs are zero. d. Suppose that the cable company begins to offer slightly faster service than the telephone company, which alters demands for the two products. Now \(q_{c}=100-2 p_{C}+3 p_{T}\) and \(q_{T}=100-\) \(4 p_{T}+p_{C}\). Show what effect this increase in service has on the prices and profit of each competitor.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.