/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q7. What is rent-seeking, and how do... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

What is rent-seeking, and how does it differ from the kinds of profit maximization and profit-seeking that we discussed in previous chapters? Provide an actual or hypothetical example of rent seeking by firms in an industry, by a union, or by a professional association (for example, physicians, school teachers, or lawyers). Why do elected officials often accommodate rent-seeking behavior, particularly by special-interest groups located in their home states?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Rent-seeking is a method to increase profit beyond what is actually required as payment of the resources or services at the expense of others. It is different from profit maximization and profit-seeking because, in profit maximization, the producer maximizes his profit through market forces.

A law requiring $500 for solar panel installation certification from a private regulatory company would be an example of benefiting the company through rent-seeking.

The elected officials accommodate rent-seeking because they want support for the next elections.

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of rent-seeking and profit maximization

Rent-seeking is a strategy to gain additional profit or income beyond the minimum payment required to keep running the resources at someone else's expense. In rent-seeking, the rent seeker looks to increase its income for a resource it provides by shifting the burden of cost to others. Rent-seeking is possible only through government help.

For instance, suppose a businessman is making money through a dance club running in a locality but creates a lot of noise pollution the whole night because he does not pay any taxes. He is maximizing his profit at the cost of social welfare, which is borne by society. It is rent-seeking behavior.

Rent-seeking is different from other profit maximization techniques. In those techniques, the entrepreneur tries to maximize their profit by adjusting their output and prices, increasing production efficiency, technology, and production quality. Profit maximization techniques work according to market ethics, while rent-seeking looks up to the government's influence.

02

Understanding rent-seeking through example

Suppose a concerned department for environment protection in the government passes a law that requires companies to install solar panels in an area to reduce the wastage of electricity during summers. The law requires that these solar panels be certified by a private regulatory authority that charges $500 for this. The head of the firm belongs to a very influential family.

This amount is unnecessary but made compulsory by the law. This is rent-seeking.

03

Elected officials accommodating the rent-seeking behavior

In the above example, the elected officials made a law to benefit the private regulatory authority. The idea is to gain support from the people as it seems like an environmental protection plan and at the same time helps a company earn income.

The elected officials' main agenda behind rent-seeking behavior is to be re-elected in the upcoming elections. Therefore, they find out how the special interest can help them win over the next elections.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Political advertising is often directed at winning over so-called swing voters, whose votes might go either way. Suppose that two political parties—the Freedom Party and the Liberty Party—disagree on whether to build a new road. Polling shows that of 1,000 total voters, 450 are firmly for the new road and 450 are firmly against the new road. Thus, each party will try to win over a majority of the 100 remaining swing voters.

a. Suppose that each party spends $5,000 on untargeted TV, radio, and newspaper ads that are equally likely to reach any and all voters. How much per voter will be spent by both parties combined?

b. Suppose that, instead, each party could direct all of its spending toward just the swing voters by using targeted social media ads. If all of the two parties’ combined spending is targeted at just swing voters, how much will be spent per swing voter?

c. Suppose that only the Freedom Party knows how to target voters using social media. How much per swing voter will it be spending? If at the same time the Liberty Party is still using only untargeted TV, radio, and newspaper ads, what portion of its total spending is likely to be reaching the 100, swing voters? How much per swing voter does that portion amount to?

d. Looking at your answers to part c, how much more per swing voter will the Freedom Party be spending than the Liberty Party? If spending per swing voter influences elections, which party is more likely to win?

True or False: The median-voter model explains why politicians so often stake out fringe positions that appeal only to a small segment of the electorate.

Consider a corrupt provincial government in which each housing inspector examines two newly built structures each week. All the builders in the province are unethical and want to increase their profits by using substandard construction materials, but they can’t do that unless they can bribe a housing inspector into approving a substandard building.

a. If bribes cost \(1,000 each, how much will a housing inspector make each year in bribes? (Assume that each inspector works 52 weeks a year and gets bribed for every house he or she inspects.)

b. There is a provincial construction supervisor who gets to hire all of the housing inspectors. He himself is corrupt and expects his housing inspectors to share their bribes with him. Suppose that 20 inspectors work for him and that each passes along half the bribes collected from builders. How much will the construction supervisor collect each year?

c. Corrupt officials may have an incentive to reduce the provision of government services to help line their own pockets. Suppose that the provincial construction supervisor decides to cut the total number of housing inspectors from 20 to 10 in order to decrease the supply of new housing permits. This decrease in the supply of permits raises the equilibrium bribe from \)1,000 to \(2,500. How much per year will the construction supervisor now receive if he is still getting half of all the bribes collected by the 10 inspectors? How much more is the construction supervisor getting now than when he had 20 inspectors working in part b? Will he personally be happy with the reduction in government services?

d. What would happen if reducing the number of inspectors from 20 to 10 only increased the equilibrium bribe from \)1,000 to $1,500? In this case, how much per year would the construction supervisor collect from his 10 inspectors? How much less is the construction supervisor getting than when he had 20 inspectors working in part b? In this case, will the construction supervisor be happy with the reduction in government services? Will he want to go back to using 20 inspectors?

Suppose that total costs (TC) double for each project listed in Table 5.2. Which project(s) is (are) now economically viable?

a. Plan A only

b. Plans C and D only

c. Plans B and C

d. Plans A and B only

Plan
Total cost of project (\()
Marginal cost (\))
Total Benefit
Marginal Benefit
Net Benefit (TB-TC)
No new construction
0-0--
A: Widen existing highways
100-200--
B: New 2-lane highways
280-350--
C: New 4-lane highways
480-470--
D: New 6-lane highways
1240-580--

Use the distinction between the characteristics of private goods and public goods to determine whether the following should be produced through the market system or provided by government: (a) French fries, (b) airport screening, (c) court systems, (d) mail delivery, and (e) medical care. Explain your answers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.