/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q4. True or False: The median-voter ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

True or False: The median-voter model explains why politicians so often stake out fringe positions that appeal only to a small segment of the electorate.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The statement is true.

Step by step solution

01

Relevance of median voter model in elections 

The median voter model says that the median voter who does not have any strong preferences for any political party decides the outcome of the elections.

It is based on the assumption that with consistent voting preferences and majority rule decisions, the decisions of the extreme voters with stronger preferences can not be altered. However, they would prefer a median solution to an opposite extreme position. Thus, the choice of the median voter dominates the election result.

02

Reason for political parties appealing to a small segment of the electorate 

Political candidates know that they do not have to worry about the voters who already have a stronger preference for their party. At the same time, they can not affect other people who have a stronger preference for other political parties. Thus, the only option left is those who hold the middle position.

Political parties appeal to these median voters and try to shift their views towards themselves by holding positions on issues that favor these median voters, who form a small segment of the electorate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Critique: 鈥淭hank goodness we have so many government regulatory agencies. They keep Big Business in check.鈥

Explain how affirmative and negative majority votes can sometimes lead to inefficient allocations of resources to public goods. Use Figures 5.2a and 5.2b to show how society might be better off if Garcia were allowed to buy votes.

Political advertising is often directed at winning over so-called swing voters, whose votes might go either way. Suppose that two political parties鈥攖he Freedom Party and the Liberty Party鈥攄isagree on whether to build a new road. Polling shows that of 1,000 total voters, 450 are firmly for the new road and 450 are firmly against the new road. Thus, each party will try to win over a majority of the 100 remaining swing voters.

a. Suppose that each party spends $5,000 on untargeted TV, radio, and newspaper ads that are equally likely to reach any and all voters. How much per voter will be spent by both parties combined?

b. Suppose that, instead, each party could direct all of its spending toward just the swing voters by using targeted social media ads. If all of the two parties鈥 combined spending is targeted at just swing voters, how much will be spent per swing voter?

c. Suppose that only the Freedom Party knows how to target voters using social media. How much per swing voter will it be spending? If at the same time the Liberty Party is still using only untargeted TV, radio, and newspaper ads, what portion of its total spending is likely to be reaching the 100, swing voters? How much per swing voter does that portion amount to?

d. Looking at your answers to part c, how much more per swing voter will the Freedom Party be spending than the Liberty Party? If spending per swing voter influences elections, which party is more likely to win?

Use your demand schedule for the public good, determined in problem 1, and the following supply schedule to ascertain the optimal quantity of this public good.

Price (\()
Qd
191
162
133
104
75
46
27
18
Price (\))Qs
1910
168
136
104
72
41
2-
1-

Does traditional one-person-one-vote (1p1v) majority voting allow voters to directly express differences in strengths of preference? Does quadratic voting do any better? Discuss the differences and then explain which system you prefer, and why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.