/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10. Critique: 鈥淭hank goodness we h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Critique: 鈥淭hank goodness we have so many government regulatory agencies. They keep Big Business in check.鈥

Short Answer

Expert verified

The government regulatory agencies are sometimes not able to perform their function with accuracy because the big businesses are able to influence (capture) the actions or policies of these regulatory agencies.

Step by step solution

01

 Role of government regulatory in keeping a check on big businesses

The government regulatory agencies keep checking the big businesses in respective industries in the economy. They check for price regulation, environmental damage, health, education, safety measures, malpractices, and others.

In practice, it is not always true. The regulatory agencies formulated for specific purposes may not be able to perform their functions honestly. They are influenced or completely captured by the industries which were supposed to be regulated.

When formulating the regulatory guidelines, the agencies aim to select eligible people or experts from respective industries. These qualified people from the industries may set some guidelines derived from their previous sentiments, favoring the big businesses.

These industries dominate the process of regulatory agencies, and the check on business remains biased by the industries. Hence, the regulatory agencies lose their significance.

02

Example explaining the failure of regulatory authorities in keeping a check on businesses

In 2008, the global economic recession resulted because of faulty functioning of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the performance of Lehman Brothers.

Lehman Brothers was adopting irresponsible lending techniques. The financial institution was exceeding the risk limits, and risk management was highly inefficient. There was also some manipulation in the institution鈥檚 balance sheet. Despite being aware of all the discrepancies, the SEC didn鈥檛 take any regulatory action against Lehman Brothers.

The government regulatory agency failed to keep a check on the financial institution. Hence, it resulted in a global economic recession.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain the paradox of voting through reference to the accompanying table, which shows the ranking of three public goods by voters Colbert, Fallon, and Kimmel


Ranking
Public good
Colbert
Fallon
Kimmel
Courthouse
2nd Choice
1st Choice
3rd Choice
School
3rd Choice
2nd Choice
1st Choice
Park
1st Choice
3rd Choice
2nd Choice

How does the problem of limited and bundled choice in the public sector relate to economic efficiency? Why are public bureaucracies possibly less efficient than business firms?

What are the two characteristics of public goods? Explain the significance of each for public provision as opposed to private provision. What is the free-rider problem as it relates to public goods? Is US border patrol a public good or a private good? Why? What type of good is a satellite TV? Explain.

Look back at Figures 5.2a and 5.2b, which show the costs and benefits to voters Garcia, Johnson, and Lee of two different public goods that the government will produce if a majority of voters support them. Suppose that Garcia, Johnson, and Lee have decided to have one single vote at which the funding for both of those public goods will be decided simultaneously.

a. Given the $300 cost per person of each public good, what are Garcia鈥檚 net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

b. What are Lee鈥檚 net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will she vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously?

c. What are Johnson鈥檚 net benefits for each public good individually and for the two combined? Will he vote yes or no on the proposal to fund both projects simultaneously鈥攐r will he be indifferent?

d. Who is the median voter here? Whom will the two other voters be attempting to persuade?

Does traditional one-person-one-vote (1p1v) majority voting allow voters to directly express differences in strengths of preference? Does quadratic voting do any better? Discuss the differences and then explain which system you prefer, and why.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.