/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3. Why are spillover costs and spil... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Why are spillover costs and spillover benefits also called negative and positive externalities? Show graphically how a tax can correct for a negative externality and how a subsidy to producers can correct for a positive externality. How does a subsidy to consumers differ from a subsidy to producers in correcting a positive externality?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Spillover costs and benefits are called negative and positive externalities, respectively, because the bearer of these effects is not a part of the market exchange and is an external party.

The two graphs explaining the effect of a tax and a subsidy are as follows:

Effect of a tax:

A backward shift in the supply curve decreases the output to reach an optimal level.

Effect of a subsidy on a producer:

A forward shift in the supply curve increases the output to reach an optimal level.

The difference is a subsidy to a consumer increases consumer鈥檚 demand, and a subsidy to producers increases supply.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Spillover costs and benefits as externalities

Spillover costs are the negative effects of an economic activity that are passed on to the people who are not directly involved in any market transaction related to a good or service. These are external costs borne by an external party, and thus spillover cost is called a negative externality.

For example, the air pollution created by a factory puts external costs on people living nearby in terms of bad health or lung problems from the smoke.

Spillover benefits are the positive effects of an economic activity that are passed onto people who are not directly involved in any market transaction related to a good or service. These are external benefits enjoyed by an external party who did not make any payment. Thus, spillover benefit is called a positive externality.

For example, a higher educated person will result in greater production and awareness in the society that will benefit others as well who did not pay for his education.

02

Step 2. Correction of a negative externality using taxes

In the following diagram, the initial market equilibrium is achieved at point 鈥渁鈥 where the supply curve S intersects with the demand curve D. However, the output level Q is not the optimal level as the external costs are not reflected in the supply curve. The intersection of the supply curve S1 and the demand curve results in an optimal level equilibrium at point 鈥渂鈥, where the efficient output level is Q1.

The difference between Q and Q1 is the overproduction caused due to negative externality, and triangle abc gives the efficiency loss.

An imposition of a tax t (Pigouvian Tax) increases the marginal cost of a firm. As a result of this higher cost of production, the firm鈥檚 supply curve shifts back to S1, and the equilibrium quantity decreases to Q1, which is an optimal level. The tax corrects the problem of overproduction by including the external costs in the form of the cost of production.

03

Step 3. Correction of a positive externality using subsidies given to producers

In the following diagram, the initial market equilibrium is achieved at point 鈥渁鈥 where the supply curve S intersects with the demand curve, D. However, the output level Q is not the optimal level as the external benefits are not reflected in the supply curve. The intersection of the supply curve S2 and demand curve results in an optimal level equilibrium at point 鈥渄鈥, where Q2 is the efficient level of output.

The difference between Q and Q2 is the underproduction caused due to positive externality, and the efficiency loss is given by triangle ade.

A subsidy is given to producers reduces the marginal cost of a firm. As a result of this lower cost of production, the firm鈥檚 supply curve shifts forward to S2, and the equilibrium quantity increases to Q2, which is an optimal level. The subsidy corrects the problem of underproduction by including the external benefits in the form of reduced cost of production.

04

Step 4. Difference between a subsidy to consumers and a subsidy to producers

A subsidy to consumers increases the demand and shifts the demand curve forward, whereas a subsidy to producers increases the supply and shifts the supply curve forward. The end effect leads to the production of an optimal level of output Q2.

The effect of a subsidy to consumers is explained using the diagram given below:

A subsidy to consumers reduces the price for consumers. This increases demand and shifts the demand curve from D to D1. A new equilibrium is achieved at point 鈥渜鈥, where the new demand curve (D1) intersects the supply curve S. As a result, the output level increases to reach its optimal level Q2.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What divergences arise between equilibrium output and efficient output when (a) negative externalities and (b) positive externalities are present? How might government correct these divergences? Cite an example (other than the text examples) of an external cost and an external benefit.

Because medical records are private, an individual applying for health insurance will know more about his own health conditions than will the insurance companies to which he is applying for coverage. Is this information asymmetry likely to increase or decrease the insurance premium? Why?

Look at Tables 4.1 and 4.2 together. What is the total surplus if Bob buys a unit from Carlos? If Barb buys a unit from Courtney? If Bob buys a unit from Chad? If you match up pairs of buyers and sellers so as to maximize the total surplus of all transactions, what is the largest total surplus that can be achieved?

PersonMaximum willingness to pay (\()
Actual price (\))

Consumer surplus (\()
Bob1385 (=13-8)
Barb1284 (=12-8)
Bill1183 (=11-8)
Bart1082(=10-8)
Brent981 (=9-8)
Betty880(=8-8)
PersonMinimum acceptable price (\))
Actual price (\()
Consumer surplus (\))
Carlos385 (=8-3)
Courtney
484 (=8-4)
Chuck
583 (=8-5)
Cindy
682 (=8-6)
Craig
781 (=8-7)
Chad
880 (=8-8)

Use marginal cost-marginal benefit analysis to determine if the following statement is true or false: 鈥淭he optimal amount of pollution abatement for some substances, say dirty water from storm drains, is very low; the optimal amount of abatement for other substances, say cyanide poison, is close to 100 percent.鈥

Assume that candle wax is traded in a perfectly competitive market in which the demand curve captures buyers鈥 full willingness to pay while the supply curve reflects all production costs. For each of the following situations, indicate whether the total output should be increased, decreased, or kept the same in order to achieve allocative and productive efficiency:

  1. Maximum willingness to pay exceeds the minimum acceptable price.
  2. MC > MB.
  3. Total surplus is at a maximum.
  4. The current quantity produced exceeds the market equilibrium quantity.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.