/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3. The following hypothetical produ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U.


China Production Alternatives

Product

A

B

C

D

E

F

Apparel (in thousands)

30

24

18

12

6

0

Chemicals (in tons)

0

6

12

18

24

30


U.S. Production Alternatives

Product

R

S

T

U

V

W

Apparel (in thousands)

10

8

6

4

2

0

Chemicals (in tons)

0

4

8

12

16

20

  1. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two areas should specialize? If so, what product should each produce?

  2. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization?

  3. What are the limits of the terms of trade? Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1½ units of chemicals and that 4 units of apparel are exchanged for 6 units of chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Yes, apparel should be produced by China, and the U.S. should produce chemicals.

  2. The total gain in apparel will be 6000, and in chemical will be 2.

  3. The limit to terms of trade will be 1000 units of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals and 1000 units of apparel for 2 tons of chemicals. The gain will be 2000 units of apparel and 2 tons of chemicals.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Explanation for part (a)

Two areas should indeed specialize.

The opportunity cost of producing apparel will be,

China=3030=1tonChemicalsU.S.=2010=2tonchemicals

The opportunity cost for 1000 units of apparel will be 1 ton of chemicals in China, and 1000 units of apparel will be 2 tons of chemicals in U. S. Hence, China will specialize in the production of apparel asit has a lower opportunity cost.

The opportunity cost of producing chemicals will be,

China=3030=1000ApparelU.S.=1020=500Apparel

The opportunity cost for 1 ton of chemicals will be 1000 units of apparel in China, and 1 ton of chemicals will be 500 units of apparel in U. S. Hence, U. S. will specialize in the production of chemicals as it has a lower opportunity cost.

02

Step 2. Explanation for part (b)

China’s optimal product mix is B before the trade, and the U.S. optimal product mix will be U before. The total production of apparel will be 28000 units of apparel (=24000 China + 4000 U. S.), and chemicals will be 18 tons of chemicals (=6 China + 12 U. S.). The total production after specialization will be 30000 units of apparel and 20 tons of chemicals. The gains from specialization will be 2000 units of apparel (=30000 – 28000) and 2 tons of chemicals (= 20 – 18).

03

Step 3. Explanation for part (c)

The opportunity cost for China in production of 1000 units of apparel will be 1 ton of chemicals, and for the U.S. will be 1000 units of apparel will be 2 tons of chemicals. If the U.S. requires more apparel, then China will produce the chemical itself. If China requires more chemicals, then the U.S. will produce the apparel itself.

Thus, the limit to terms of trade will be 1000 units of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals and 1000 units of apparel for 2 tons of chemicals.

The actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1½ units of chemicals and that 4000 units of apparel are exchanged for 6 tons of chemicals.

  • The U.S. produces 20 tons of chemicals and trades 4000 units of apparel for 6 tons of chemicals; thus, after trade will be 14 (=20 – 6) tons of chemicals and 4000 units of apparel.

  • China produces 30000 units of apparel and trade 6 tons of chemicals for 4000 units of apparel; thus, after trade will be 26000 (=30000 – 4000) units of apparel and 6 tons of chemicals. The gains to China will be 2000 (=26000 – 24000) apparel units, and the U.S. will gain 2 (=14 – 12) tons of chemicals.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What central point was Bastiat trying to make in his fictional petition of the candlemakers?

In 2018, manufacturing workers in the United States earned average compensation of \(21.86 per hour. That same year, manufacturing workers in Mexico earned average compensation of \)3.20 per hour. How can U.S. manufacturers possibly compete? Why isn’t all manufacturing done in Mexico and other low-wage countries?

Suppose that the opportunity-cost ratio for watches and cheese is 1C ≡ 1W in Switzerland but 1C ≡ 4W in Japan. At which of the following international exchange ratios (terms of trade) will Switzerland and Japan be willing to specialize and engage in trade with each other? Select one or more answers from the choices shown.

  1. 1C ≡ 3W

  2. 1°ä≡1/2°Â

  3. 1C ≡ 5W

  4. 1/2°ä≡1°Â

  5. 2C ≡ 1W

Suppose Big Country can produce 80 units of X by using all its resources to produce X or 60 units of Y by devoting all its resources to Y. Comparable figures for Small Nation are 60 units of X and 60 units of Y. Assuming constant costs, in which product should each nation specialize? Explain why. What are the limits of the terms of trade between these two countries?

Suppose that if Iceland and Japan were both closed economies, the domestic price of fish would be \(100 per ton in Iceland and \)90 per ton in Japan. If the two countries decided to open up to international trade with each other, which of the following could be the equilibrium international price of fish once they begin trading?

a. \(75

b. \)85

c. \(95

d. \)105

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.