/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10. How might protective tariffs red... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

How might protective tariffs reduce both the imports and the exports of the nation that levies tariffs? How might import competition lead to quality improvements and cost reductions by U.S. firms?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The import tariff leads to a decrease in the nation's export that levies tariffs, like every other nation also imposes import tariffs.

The import competition leads to innovative ways of production; thus, it reduces cost and improves the quality of the U.S. firms.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Protective tariff

The government imposes tariffs to protect the domestic producer; thus, reducing the number of imports. The other nations also impose tariffs to protect their producers as a response, reducing the export of the nation that levied tariffs. Thus, protective tariffs reduce both the imports and the exports of the nation.

02

Step 2. Import competition

The import competition improves the quality of the U.S. goods to gain shares in the global market. The U.S. firms have to make their imports different from other nations' firms. As the quality of the product increases, it will also increase the export; thus, as export increases, then production also rises. The increase in the production level also decreases the cost of production as the firm competes with the cost side.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Figure 3.6, page 57. Assume that the graph depicts the U.S. domestic market for corn. How many bushels of corn, if any, will the United States export or import at a world price of \(1, \)2, \(3, \)4, and \(5? Use this information to construct the U.S. export supply curve and import demand curve for corn. Suppose that the only other corn-producing nation is France, where the domestic price is \)4. Which country will export corn; which county will import it?

The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U.


China Production Alternatives

Product

A

B

C

D

E

F

Apparel (in thousands)

30

24

18

12

6

0

Chemicals (in tons)

0

6

12

18

24

30


U.S. Production Alternatives

Product

R

S

T

U

V

W

Apparel (in thousands)

10

8

6

4

2

0

Chemicals (in tons)

0

4

8

12

16

20

  1. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two areas should specialize? If so, what product should each produce?

  2. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization?

  3. What are the limits of the terms of trade? Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1½ units of chemicals and that 4 units of apparel are exchanged for 6 units of chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation?

Suppose that the opportunity-cost ratio for sugar and almonds is 4S ≡ 1A in Hawaii but 1S ≡ 2A in California. Which state has the comparative advantage in producing almonds?

  1. Hawaii

  2. California

  3. Neither

True or False. If Country B has an absolute advantage over Country A in producing bicycles, it will also have a comparative advantage over Country A in producing bicycles.

The accompanying hypothetical production possibilities tables are for New Zealand and Spain. Each country can produce apples and plums. Plot the production possibilities data for each of the two countries separately. Referring to your graphs, answer the following:

New Zealand’s Production Possibilities Table (Millions of Bushels)


Production Alternatives

Product

A

B

C

D

Apples

0

20

40

60

Plums

15

10

5

0


Spain’s Production Possibilities Table (Millions of Bushels)


Production Alternatives

Product

R

S

T

U

Apples

0

20

40

60

Plums

60

40

20

0

  1. What is each country’s cost ratio of producing plums and apples?

  2. Which nation should specialize in which product?

  3. Show the trading possibilities lines for each nation if the actual terms of trade are 1 plum for 2 apples. (Plot these lines on your graph.)

  4. Suppose the optimum product mixes before specialization and trade were alternative B in New Zealand and alternative S in Spain. What would be the gains from specialization and trade?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.