/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 What is free riding? How is free... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 5: Problem 2

What is free riding? How is free riding related to the need for public goods?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Free riding is a situation where people benefit from public goods without contributing to their costs. It is related to public goods in that it can result in the underprovision of such goods due to insufficient funds, as free riders are not contributing towards these costs.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Free Riding

Free riding occurs when people take advantage of a public good without contributing to its cost. The concept is named as such because these individuals or groups 鈥檙ide鈥� off the expense and effort of others, without making their own contribution.
02

Understanding Public Goods

Public goods refer to commodities or services that are provided without profit for all society members. Examples of public goods include clean air, street lighting, and public parks. These goods are usually funded by taxes and are available for everyone to use, regardless of their contribution to taxes.
03

Connection between Free Riding and Public Goods

Free riding is closely connected to public goods as individuals or groups can benefit from those goods without contributing to them. While this situation can be unavoidable due to the nature of public goods, excessive free riding can lead to the under-provision of these goods because the cost falls solely on the part of the population that contributes towards them. This can result in issues such as insufficient funds to maintain or improve these goods.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When does the private cost of producing a good differ from the social cost? Give an example. When does the private benefit from consuming a good differ from the social benefit? Give an example.

In discussing the reduction of air pollution in the developing world, Richard Fuller of the Blacksmith Institute, an environmental organization, observed, "It's the \(90 / 10\) rule. To do 90 percent of the work only costs 10 percent of the money. It's the last 10 percent of the cleanup that costs 90 percent of the money." Why should it be any more costly to clean up the last 10 percent of polluted air than to clean up the first 90 percent? What trade-offs would be involved in cleaning up the final 10 percent? Source: Tiffany M. Luck, "The World's Dirtiest Cities," Forbes, February 26,2008 .

In the first years following the passage of the Clean Air Act in \(1970,\) air pollution declined sharply, and there were important health benefits, including a decline in infant mortality. According to an article in the Economist, however, recently some policymakers "worry that the EPA is constantly tightening restrictions on pollution, at ever higher cost to business but with diminishing returns in terms of public health." a. Why might additional reductions in air pollution come at "ever higher cost"? What does the article mean by arguing that these reductions will result in "diminishing returns in terms of public health"? b. How should the federal government decide whether further reductions in air pollution are needed?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 156 ) Ira Goldman invented the Knee Defender, which keeps the airline seat in front of a passenger from reclining. He argues that airlines have sold the space between two seats to the person occupying the seat but also to the person in the seat in front of that seat by allowing the occupant of that seat to recline it. Assume that Goldman is correct. According to the Coase theorem, does this airline policy make it impossible for passengers to achieve an economically efficient outcome with respect to the issue of reclining seats? Briefly explain.

In 2017, President Donald Trump was considering a major increase on federal government spending on infrastructure, including building and repairing bridges, highways, rail lines, and subways. An article in the Economist argued, "Just as economists talk of 'negative externalities' (from, say, pollution), infrastructure can have positive externalities that are not captured by investors but will benefit society." a. Explain what positive externalities infrastructure spending might generate. b. If infrastructure spending generates a positive externality, what effect should this have on government policy?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

Taxation Economics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.