/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 In 2017, President Donald Trump ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In 2017, President Donald Trump was considering a major increase on federal government spending on infrastructure, including building and repairing bridges, highways, rail lines, and subways. An article in the Economist argued, "Just as economists talk of 'negative externalities' (from, say, pollution), infrastructure can have positive externalities that are not captured by investors but will benefit society." a. Explain what positive externalities infrastructure spending might generate. b. If infrastructure spending generates a positive externality, what effect should this have on government policy?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Infrastructure spending can generate positive externalities such as increased business productivity owing to better transport networks, or enhancement of property values due to better public utilities. These are benefits that are not captured by the market price. When these positive externalities exist, it implies that market forces alone will not result in an optimal level of infrastructure because they do not account for these positive external benefits. This means government intervention is necessary, either via subsidies or direct investment, to ensure these benefits are realized.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Positive Externalities

Positive externalities are additional benefits that an individual or society receives from a product or service, but that are not accounted for in the market price. In the context of infrastructure spending, positive externalities might include the increased productivity of businesses owing to improved transportation networks, or the enhancement of property values in areas that gain better access to public utilities.
02

Effects of Positive Externalities

If a positive externality is present, the social benefit from a good or service exceeds the private benefit. Due to these external benefits, the product or service will be under-consumed and under-produced in a freely functioning market. The reason is that the individuals or firms producing the product or service do not have an incentive to factor in these external benefits while making their production decision.
03

Positive Externalities and Government Policy

If infrastructure spending generates a positive externality, it implies that market forces alone will not lead to an optimal level of infrastructure. This is because market forces do not account for the positive external benefits generated by infrastructure spending. As a result, this should lead to government intervention to increase the production and consumption of infrastructure. The government can do this by subsidizing infrastructure projects, for example, or by directly investing in infrastructure itself.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Infrastructure Spending
Infrastructure spending refers to the allocation of resources by the government to develop, improve, and maintain foundational facilities like roads, bridges, railways, and subways. This investment is crucial because it not only supports the day-to-day operation of society but also facilitates economic growth. Improved infrastructure enhances transportation, making it easier for goods to move from one place to another. This can lead to reduced costs for businesses and improved accessibility for consumers.
In the context of infrastructure, the concept of positive externalities comes into play. When the government invests in infrastructure, it creates benefits that go beyond the immediate purpose of the project.
For instance:
  • Better roads can reduce travel time for commuters, improving their quality of life.
  • Enhanced public transport systems can reduce traffic congestion, leading to less pollution and a healthier environment.
  • Improving access to utilities can increase property values, contributing to community wealth.
These are examples of positive externalities, where the advantages extend to the broader community, not just the direct users of the infrastructure.
Government Policy
Government policy plays a pivotal role in managing infrastructure investments to harness positive externalities. Since private markets often underinvest in infrastructure due to these external advantages not being accounted for in their costs or profits, government intervention becomes essential. Policies that encourage infrastructure spending can lead to significant social benefits beyond what the market can achieve on its own.
For instance, the government may:
  • Provide subsidies to support infrastructure projects that offer widespread societal benefits.
  • Directly invest in large-scale infrastructure developments to ensure their completion and accessibility.
  • Regulate private investments in infrastructure to align with public interests and maximize benefit distribution.
By using these strategies, governments aim to correct market inefficiencies and ensure that the positive externalities of infrastructure investment are realized by the entire community.
Economic Productivity
Economic productivity is greatly influenced by infrastructure investments. With improved infrastructure, businesses can operate more efficiently and at a lower cost. This can be seen when transportation networks are enhanced, allowing materials and finished goods to be transported more quickly and reliably.
Infrastructure improvements lead to:
  • Lower logistical costs for businesses, freeing up resources for other productive uses.
  • A smoother supply chain, facilitating timely deliveries and inventory management.
  • Greater connectivity, which can open up new markets and economic opportunities.
These changes help increase the country's overall productivity and competitiveness on the global stage. By investing in infrastructure, governments can lay the groundwork for sustained economic growth and prosperity.
Market Inefficiencies
Market inefficiencies occur when the allocation of resources by the market does not achieve optimal outcomes for society. In the case of infrastructure, these inefficiencies arise because the market fails to fully incorporate the external benefits of infrastructure projects into decision-making processes. This means infrastructure projects may be underfunded or not undertaken at all without government intervention.
This happens because:
  • Private firms focus on the immediate costs and returns of projects, overlooking broader societal impacts.
  • Infrastructure projects often require significant upfront investment with long-term returns, making them less attractive to private investors.
  • The benefits that extend to the larger community create a 鈥渇ree rider鈥 problem, where individuals who do not invest in the project still enjoy its benefits.
By recognizing these market inefficiencies, governments can take actions such as investing directly in infrastructure, providing incentives for private investment, or creating collaborative investment frameworks, thereby ensuring these projects are aligned with societal needs and harnessing their full potential for public benefit.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the tragedy of the commons? How can it be avoided?

John Cassidy, a writer for the New Yorker, wrote a blog post arguing against New York City's having installed bike lanes. Cassidy complained that the bike lanes had eliminated traffic lanes on some streets as well as some on-street parking. A writer for the Economist disputed Cassidy's argument with the following comment: "I hate to belabour the point, but driving, as it turns out, is associated with a number of negative externalities." What externalities are associated with driving? How do these externalities affect the debate over whether big cities should install more bike lanes?

Vaccines don't provide immunity from disease for some people. But if most people get vaccinated against a disease, such as measles, then the population achieves "herd immunity," which means that there are so few cases of the disease that even people for whom vaccinations are ineffective are unlikely to contract the disease. An article in the Economist argued that "herd immunity is a classic public good." a. Do you agree with this statement? b. The same article argued that there is an incentive to "free ride' off the contributions of others" by not getting vaccinated. What does the author mean by "free ride"? If the author is correct, what will be the effect of this free riding? c. Given your answer to part (b), why do most people vaccinate their children against childhood diseases, and why do many adults get vaccinated against influenza?

In writing about the increased popularity of national parks in the United States, such as Yosemite, Yellowstone, and the Grand Canyon, environmental economist Margaret Walls wrote: When one person's visit to a park doesn't appreciably diminish the experience for others, the fee to use the park should be zero. That doesn't apply when the public good starts to experience congestion problems ... the Park Service should ... [charge] a significantly higher fee at the most popular parks during the summer months. Are Yosemite and other national parks public goods? Briefly explain. Source: Margaret A. Walls, "Protecting Our National Parks: Entrance Fees Can Help," 91影视, No. \(193,\) Fall \(2016 .\)

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 163) An economist for the Brookings Institution argued that "a price on carbon would minimize the cost of steering economic activity away from the greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the climate." a. In what sense does a carbon tax put a price on carbon? b. How would a carbon tax steer economic activity away from greenhouse gas emissions? c. Why might a carbon tax be less costly to the economy than a command-and- control approach to reducinggreenhouse gases? Why might a command-and-control approach to pollution control still be more politically popular than a carbon tax? Include in your answer a brief discussion of the difference between the normative analysis and positive analysis of this policy issue.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.