/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 The gaseous reaction \(A \longri... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The gaseous reaction \(A \longrightarrow B\) has a unimolecular reaction rate constant of \(0.0015 \mathrm{min}^{-1}\) at \(80^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). This reaction is to be carried out in parallel tubes \(10 \mathrm{ft}\) long and 1 in. inside diameter under a pressure of 132 psig at \(260^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). A production rate of \(1000 \mathrm{lb} / \mathrm{h}\) of \(\mathrm{B}\) is required. Assuming an activation energy of 25,000 cal/mol. how many tubes are needed if the conversion of \(A\) is to be \(90 \% ?\) Assume perfect gas laws. A and \(\mathrm{B}\) each have molecular weights of 58 . (From California Professional Engineers Exam.)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The number of tubes needed to achieve a production rate of 1000 lb/h of compound B with a 90% conversion of compound A is approximately 29 tubes.

Step by step solution

01

鈧. Calculate the reaction rate constant at the given temperature

First, we need to find the reaction rate constant at \(260^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). We can use the Arrhenius equation to calculate this: \[k_{2} = k_{1} \cdot \exp{\left(-\frac{E_{a}}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T_{2}} - \frac{1}{T_{1}}\right)\right)}\] where: - \(k_{1}\) is the initial reaction rate constant given (\(0.0015 \mathrm{min}^{-1}\)), - \(k_{2}\) is the reaction rate constant at the desired temperature, - \(E_{a}\) is the activation energy (25,000 cal/mol), - \(R\) is the gas constant (1.987 cal/mol K), - \(T_{1}\) is the initial temperature (\(80^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), converted to K), - and \(T_{2}\) is the desired temperature (\(260^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), converted to K). First, we convert the given temperatures to Kelvin: \[T_1 = 80^{\circ} \mathrm{F} + 459.67 \, (\mathrm{R}) = (80 + 459.67) \frac{5}{9} \; (\mathrm{K}) = 301.11 \; (\mathrm{K})\] \[T_2 = 260^{\circ} \mathrm{F}+ 459.67 \, (\mathrm{R}) = (260 + 459.67) \frac{5}{9} \; (\mathrm{K}) = 394.26 \; (\mathrm{K})\] Now we can plug these values into the Arrhenius equation and calculate \(k_{2}\): \[k_2 = 0.0015 \cdot \exp{\left( -\frac{25000}{1.987} \left( \frac{1}{394.26} - \frac{1}{301.11} \right) \right)} = 0.0052 \mathrm{min}^{-1}\]
02

鈧. Determine the time required for a 90% conversion

Since the reaction is first-order, we can use the integrated rate law equation: \[C_{A} = C_{A0} \cdot \exp{(-kt)}\] Solving for \(t\), we get: \[t = -\frac{1}{k}\ln{\frac{C_{A}}{C_{A0}}}\] We have: - \(C_{A0}\) is the initial concentration of A, - \(C_{A}\) is the final concentration of A, - \(k\) is the rate constant at the desired temperature (0.0052 min\(^{-1}\)), - and \(t\) is the time required for the conversion. For a 90% conversion, we can write: \[t = -\frac{1}{0.0052 \, \mathrm{min}^{-1}} \ln{\frac{0.10 \cdot C_{A0}}{C_{A0}}}\] \[t = \frac{1}{0.0052 \, \mathrm{min}^{-1}} \biggl(\ln{10}\biggr) \approx 49.79\,(\mathrm{min})\]
03

鈧. Calculate the required flowrate

We need the volumetric flow rate to determine the quantity of gaseous A to be processed. \[Q = \frac{m_{B}}{\rho_i \cdot (1-X)}, \] where: - \(Q\) is the volumetric flow rate, - \(m_{B}\) is the required mass flow rate of B (1000 lb/h), - \(\rho_i\) is the initial density of A, - and \(X\) is the conversion (0.90). First, we need to find the initial density \(\rho_i\). It can be calculated using the ideal gas law: \[\rho_i = \frac{PM_i}{RT}\] where: - \(P\) is the pressure (132 psig, converted to atm), - \(M_i\) is the molecular weight of A (58 g/mol), - and \(T\) is the initial temperature. \[P_\mathrm{atm} = 132 \,(\mathrm{psig}) \times \frac{14.696}{101.325} = 127.6 \, (\mathrm{atm})\] Now we can find the initial density: \[\rho_i = \frac{127.6 \, (\mathrm{atm}) \times 58 \, (\mathrm{g/mol})}{0.0821 \, (\frac{\mathrm{atm} \cdot \mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{mol} \cdot \mathrm{K}}) \times 394.26 \, (\mathrm{K})} = 258.98 \, (\frac{\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{L}})\] Now we calculate the volumetric flow rate: \[Q = \frac{1000 \, (\frac{\mathrm{lb}}{\mathrm{h}}) \times \frac{1}{2.20462} \, (\frac{\mathrm{kg}}{\mathrm{lb}}) \times \frac{1000}{1} \, (\frac{\mathrm{g}}{\mathrm{kg}})}{258.98 \,(\mathrm{g}\mathrm{L}^{-1}) \times (1 - 0.90)} = 343.73 \, (\mathrm{L/min})\]
04

鈧. Calculate the number of tubes

Now, we can find the number of tubes needed. First, we need to find how much volume is processed in one tube during the residence time calculated in step 2. The volume of one tube is given by its dimensions (10 ft long and 1 in. inside diameter): \[V_\mathrm{tube} = \pi(\frac{1}{2}\cdot 0.0254 \, \mathrm{m})^2 \times 10 \cdot \frac{1}{3.28084} \, (\mathrm{m}) = 0.01022 \, (\mathrm{m^{3}})\] Now, we can calculate the volumetric flow rate through one tube at a given time: \[Q_\mathrm{tube} = V_{\mathrm{tube}} / t\] \[Q_\mathrm{tube} = \frac{0.01022 \, (\mathrm{m^{3}})}{49.79\, (\mathrm{min}) \cdot \frac{1}{60} \, (\mathrm{h/min})} = 0.01222 \,(\mathrm{L/min})\] Now, we divide the required flow rate by the flow rate processed in one tube to obtain the number of tubes: \[\text{Number of tubes}= \frac{Q}{Q_\mathrm{tube}}\] \[\text{Number of tubes}= \frac{343.73 \,(\mathrm{L/min})}{0.01222 \, (\mathrm{L/min})} \approx 28.13\] Since we cannot have a fraction of a tube, we need to round up to the nearest whole number to meet the production requirements.
05

Conclusion

The number of tubes needed to achieve a production rate of 1000 lb/h of compound B with a 90% conversion of compound A is approximately 29 tubes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Arrhenius Equation
The Arrhenius equation is crucial for students learning about chemical reaction engineering. It relates the rate at which a chemical reaction proceeds to the temperature at which it is occurring. The core idea behind this equation is that increasing the temperature will increase the reaction rate. But how is this relationship quantified?

The equation is expressed as:
\[k = A \times \text{e}^{-\frac{E_a}{RT}}\]
where:
  • \(k\) is the rate constant,
  • \(A\) is the pre-exponential factor, a constant that represents the frequency of collisions between reactant molecules,
  • \(E_a\) is the activation energy, or the minimum energy that a molecule must have for a reaction to occur,
  • \(R\) is the ideal gas constant, and
  • \(T\) is the absolute temperature.

This can be seen as an exponential relationship: even a small increase in temperature can lead to a substantial increase in the rate constant, and thus the speed of the reaction.

Imagine we have two temperatures, \(T_1\) and \(T_2\), and the rate constants for these temperatures are \(k_1\) and \(k_2\) respectively. If we know \(k_1\), \(E_a\), and \(R\), we can calculate \(k_2\) for the new temperature using the Arrhenius equation. This calculation is vital in industrial settings, where the control of reaction rates is essential for efficiency and safety.
Rate Constant Calculation
Understanding the rate constant calculation is critical for mastering chemical kinetics and reaction engineering. The rate constant, \(k\), denotes the speed at which a reaction takes place, and it is influenced by various factors, including temperature, as discussed in the Arrhenius equation. Let's get practical and see how you calculate \(k\) using that equation.

For instance, in the given exercise, we're dealing with a reaction at two different temperatures. The initial rate constant \(k_1\) at \(T_1\) is provided, and we aim to find the new rate constant \(k_2\) at \(T_2\). Converting temperatures to Kelvin avoids the complication of negative values since absolute zero in Kelvin is the lowest possible temperature. The resulting temperatures are then used with the given activation energy and gas constant to resolve the equation for \(k_2\).

A concrete example from our exercise is calculating \(k_2\) at \(260^{\text{o}} F\) using \(k_1\) given at \(80^{\text{o}} F\). The conversion of temperatures to Kelvin and the usage of \(E_a\) (activation energy in cal/mol) allows us to extract the value of \(k_2\). This step is paramount because the rate constant at the operating temperature dictates how fast the reaction will proceed and, in practical applications, influences the design and scale of the reactors we need.
Conversion Calculation
The goal of many chemical reactions in industry is to convert reactants into products efficiently. The extent to which this occurs is called conversion, usually expressed as a percentage. It has direct implications on the economy of the process, the design of equipment, and operational parameters.

In reaction engineering, calculating conversion typically begins with understanding stoichiometry and the rate laws governing the reaction. The rate law indicates how the rate depends on the concentration of reactants. For a first-order reaction, the integrated rate law is used, showing how concentration changes with time:
\[C = C_0 \text{e}^{-kt}\]
where \(C_0\) is the initial concentration, \(C\) is the concentration after time \(t\), and \(k\) is the rate constant.

The conversion, \(X\), is usually defined as:\[X = \frac{C_0 - C}{C_0}\]
In the context of our exercise, we're aiming for a 90% conversion鈥攎eaning that 90% of reactant A has turned into product B. To calculate the time needed for this conversion, we rearrange the integrated rate law to solve for \(t\), using the known rate constant at the operating temperature and the desired conversion. These calculations are essential when you need to predict how long your reaction must run to achieve the desired product yield.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) A liquid-phase isomerization \(A \longrightarrow B\) is carried out in a 1000 -gal CSTR that has a single impeller located halfway down the reactor. The liquid enters at the top of the reactor and exits at the bottom. The reaction is second order. Experimental data taken in a batch reactor predicted the CSTR conversion should be \(50 \%\). However, the conversion measured in the actual CSTR was \(57 \% .\) Suggest reasons for the discrepancy and suggest something that would give closer agreement between the predicted and measured conversions. Back your suggestions with calculations. P.S. It was raining that day. (b) The first-order gas-phase isomerization reaction $$A \stackrel{A}{\longrightarrow} B \text { with } k=5 \min ^{-1}$$ is to be carried out in a tubular reactor. For a feed of pure \(A\) of 5 \(\mathrm{dm}^{3} / \mathrm{min}\), the expected conversion in a PFR is \(63.2 \%\). However. when the reactor was put in operation, the conversion was only \(58.6 \% .\) We should note that the straight tubular reactor would not fit in the available space. One engineer suggested that the reactor be cut in half and the two reactors be put side by side with equal feed to each. However, the chief engineer overrode this suggestion saying the tubular reactor had to be one piece so he bent the reactor in a U shape. The bend was not a good one. Brainstorm and make a list of things that could cause this off-design specification. Choose the most logical explanation/model, and carry out a calculation to show quantitatively that with your model the conversion is 58.6%. (An Ans: 57% of the total) (c) The liquid-phase reaction $$A \longrightarrow B$$ was carried out in a CSTR. For an entering concentration of \(2 \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{dm}^{3}\) the conversion was \(40 \%\). For the same reactor volume and entering conditions as the CSTR, the expected PFR conversion is 48.6%. However. the PFR conversion was amazingly \(50 \%\) exactly. Brainstorm reasons for the disparity. Quantitatively show how these conversions came about (i.e.., the expected conversion and the actual conversion). (d) The gas-phase reaction $$A+B \longrightarrow C+D$$ is carried out in a packed bed reactor. When the particle size was decreased by \(15 \%\). the conversion remained unchanged. When the particle size was decreased by \(20 \%,\) the conversion decreased. When the original particle size was increased by \(15 \%,\) the conversion also decreased. In all cases, the temperature, the total catalyst weight. and all other conditions remained unchanged. What's going on here?

The reversible isomerization $$\text { m Xylene \(\rightleftarrows\) para-Xylene }$$ follows an elementary rate law. If \(X_{c}\) is the equilibrium conversion, (a) Show for a batch and a PFR: \(t=\tau_{\mathrm{PFR}}=\frac{X_{\mathrm{e}}}{k} \ln \frac{X_{\mathrm{e}}}{X_{\mathrm{e}}-X}\) (b) Show for a CSTR: \(\tau_{\mathrm{PFR}}=\frac{X_{\mathrm{c}}}{k}\left(\frac{X_{\mathrm{e}}}{X_{\mathrm{e}}-X}\right)\) (c) Show that the volume efficiency is $$\frac{V_{\mathrm{PFR}}}{V_{\mathrm{CSTR}}}=\frac{\left(X_{\mathrm{e}}-\mathrm{X}\right) \ln \left(\frac{X_{\mathrm{e}}}{X_{\mathrm{e}}-X}\right)}{X_{\mathrm{c}}}$$ and then plot the volume efficiency as a function of the ratio \(\left(X / X_{\mathrm{e}}\right)\) from 0 to 1 (d) What would be the volume efficiency for two CSTRs in series with the sum of the two CSTR volumes being the same as the PFR volume?

Nutrition is an important part of ready-to-eat cereal. To make cereal healthier, many nutrients are added. Unfortunately, nutrients degrade over time, making it necessary to add more than the declared amount to assure enough for the life of the cereal. Vitamin \(V_{1}\) is declared at a level of \(20 \%\) of the Recommended Daily Allowance per serving size (serving size \(=30 \mathrm{g}\) ). The Recommended Daily Allowance is \(6500 \mathrm{IU}\left(1.7 \times 10^{6} \mathrm{IU}=1 \mathrm{g}\right) .\) It has been found that the degradation of this nutrient is first order in the amount of nutrients. Accelerated storage tests have been conducted on this cereal, with the following results: $$\begin{array}{l|ccc} \text { Temperature }\left(^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\right) & 45 & 55 & 65 \\ \hline k \text { (week }^{-1} \text {) } & 0.0061 & 0.0097 & 0.0185 \end{array}$$ (a) Given this information and the fact that the cereal needs to have a vitamin level above the declared value of 6500 IU for 1 year at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). what IU should be present in the cereal at the time it is manufactured? Your answer may also be reported in percent overuse: $$\% \mathrm{OU}=\frac{C(t=0)-C(t=1 \mathrm{yr})}{C(t=1 \mathrm{yr})} \times 100$$ (b) At what percent of declared value of 6500 IU must you apply the vitamin? If 10,000.000 lb/yr of the cereal is made and the nutrient cost is S100 per pound, how much will this overuse cost? (c) If this were your factory, what percent overuse would you actually apply and why? (d) How would your answers change if you stored the material in a Bangkok warehouse for 6 months. where the daily temperature is \(40^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), before moving it to the supermarket? (Table of results of accelerated storage tests on cereal; and Problem of vitamin level of cereal after storage courtesy of General Mills, Minneapolis, MN.)

As we move toward a hydrogen-based energy economy for use in fuel cells. The use of fuel cells to operate appliances ranging from computers to automobiles is rapidly becoming a reality. In the immediate future, fuel cells will use hydrogen to produce electricity, which some have said will lead to a hydrogen- based economy instead of a petroleum-based economy. A large component in the processing train for fuel cells is the water gas shift membrane reactor. (M. Gummala, N. Gupla, B. Olsomer, and Z. Dardas. Paper \(103 c, 2003,\) AIChE National Meeting, New Orleans. LA.) $$\mathrm{CO}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{CO}_{2}+\mathrm{H}_{2}$$ Here \(\mathrm{CO}\) and water are fed to the membrane reactor containing the catalyst. Hydrogen can diffuse out the sides of the membrane while \(\mathrm{CO}, \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O},\) and \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) cannot. Based on the following information, plot the concentrations and molar flow rates of each of the reacting species down the length of the membrane reactor. Assume the following. The volumetric feed is \(10 \mathrm{dm}^{3} / \mathrm{min}\) at 10 atm, and the equil molar feed of \(\mathrm{CO}\) and water vapor with \(C_{\mathrm{T} 0}=0.4 \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{dm}^{3}\) The equilibrium constant is \(K_{e}=1.44 .\) The \(k\) specific reaction rate constant is \(1.37 \mathrm{dm}^{6} / \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{kg}\) cat \(\cdot \mathrm{min},\) and the mass transfer coefficient for hydrogen. \(k_{\mathrm{CH}_{2}}=0.1 \mathrm{dm}^{3} / \mathrm{kg}\) cat \(\cdot\) min. What is the reactor volume necessary to achieve \(85 \%\) conversion of \(\mathrm{CO} ?\) Compare with a PFR. For that same reactor volume. what would be the conversion if the feed rate were doubled?

A CSTR with two impellers is modeled as three CSTRs in series.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.