/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Bread is typically made by first... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Bread is typically made by first dissolving preserved yeast (a microscopic biological organism that consumes sugars and emits \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) as a waste product) in water, then adding other ingredients, including flour, sugar, fat (usually butter or shortening), and salt. After the ingredients are combined, the dough is "kneaded," or mixed to promote the formation of a protein network from two proteins (gliadin and glutenin) \(^{15}\) present in wheat flour. This network is what strengthens the dough and allows it to stretch elastically without breaking. The dough is then allowed to rise in a process called "proofing," in which the yeast consumes sugar and releases \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\), which inflates air pockets in the dough that are subsequently filled with air. Finally the dough is baked; the gas pockets expand due to the temperature rise and evaporation of water, the starches from the flour are dehydrated (dried), and the yeast dies. A good French bread has an open, porous structure. The pores must be stabilized by the protein network until the bread is dried sufficiently to hold its shape. The bread collapses if the protein network fails prematurely. (a) Rouille et al. \(^{16}\) investigated the influence of ingredients and mixing conditions on the quality of frozen French bread dough. Each loaf was initially formed roughly as a cylinder with a mass of 150 g (including essentially no \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) ), a diameter of \(2.0 \mathrm{cm},\) and a length of \(25.0 \mathrm{cm}\). Determine the specific volume of a bread dough proofed for two hours at \(28^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) from which \(1.20 \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) gas/min per 100 g dough evolves as bubbles within the dough. State your assumptions. (b) During proofing, the increases in volume of a series of control loaves were monitored along with the mass of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) evolved. Rupture of the protein network during proofing can be detected when the volume of the dough no longer increases at the same rate as the production of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) from the yeast. Data from one of these experiments are shown in the table below. Plot the specific volumes of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) (per \(100 \mathrm{g}\) dough) and dough as a function of time. If the preferred proofing time is such that the dough achieves \(70 \%\) of its total volume before collapse, specify the proper proofing time for this formula. (c) The referenced study found that the parameter with the most significant influence on dough quality was mixing time, with an extended mixing time producing a stronger protein network. Why might extended mixing times not be desirable in commercial production of bread? (d) Suggest causes for the following undesirable bread-baking outcomes: (i) a flat, dense loaf; (ii) an overly large loaf. (e) Suggest why the period during which the dough rises is called "proofing." Remember that yeast is a biological organism. $$\begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline t \text { (min) } & 0 & 20 & 40 & 60 & 80 & 100 & 120 & 140 & 160 & 180 & 200 & 220 & 240 \\ \hline \Delta V \text { (cm }^{3} \text { dough) } & 0 & 0 & 20 & 60 & 80 & 115 & 155 & 198 & 247 & 305 & 322 & 334 & 336 \\ \hline \text { gas evolved }\left(\mathrm{g} \mathrm{CO}_{2}\right) & 0.0 & 37.2 & 63.2 & 68.8 & 126.3 & 192.7 & 234.8 & 315.8 & 385.4 & 515.0 & 578.1 & 657.5 & 745.0 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The specific volume is determined by the initial volume of the cylinder and the increase in volume due to the gas production. The preferred proofing time can be determined by plotting the given data and finding the point where the volume no longer increases linearly with the \(CO_{2}\) production. Extended mixing times, while improving dough quality, are not desirable in commercial production due to increased time and energy resources. Baking outcomes can be attributed to gas production from yeast activity and proofing time. The term 'proofing' likely refers to observing the 'proof' or evidence of yeast activity.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the specific volume

The specific volume can be calculated using the formula for volume of a cylinder \(V= \pi r^{2} h\) and the definition of specific volume, which is volume per unit mass. In this case, the mass is 150 g, the radius \(r\) is \(1.0 cm\), and the height \(h\) is \(25.0 cm\). Therefore, the specific volume \(v_{sp}\) can be calculated as \(V_{sp} = V/m\). Given that the gas volume produced is \(1.20 cm^{3}\) gas/min per 100 g dough, we can calculate the increase in volume \(\Delta V\) over the proofing time of 2 hours, which gives us the final specific volume.
02

Interpret the experimental data to determine the proofing time

The table in the problem statement provides the specific volume \(\Delta V\) of dough as well as the gas evolved as \(CO_{2}\) over time. As stated, rupture of the protein network during proofing can be seen when the volume no longer increases at the same rate as the production of \(CO_{2}\). By plotting the data and finding the point where the volume increase deviates from the gas evolution, we can calculate the preferred proofing time as the time at which the dough achieves \(70 \%\) of its volume.
03

Analyze the effect of mixing time

Extended mixing times result in a stronger protein network. While this may improve the quality of the dough, it may not be feasible in commercial production due to the increased time and energy resources required. Moreover, over-mixing can lead to other problems such as a tough final product.
04

Understand the causes of baking outcomes

(i) A flat, dense loaf may be caused by inadequate gas formation, which could be due to low yeast activity or insufficient proofing time. (ii) An overly large loaf might be result of excessive gas production, which could be caused by too much yeast or a long proofing time.
05

Define 'proofing'

'Proofing' likely refers to the proof or evidence that the yeast is alive and active. During this process, the yeast consumes sugar and releases \(CO_{2}\), causing the dough to rise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Biochemical Reactions in Bread Making
The process of bread making is fascinatingly complex, involving a series of biochemical reactions that transform basic ingredients into a fluffy, delicious loaf. One of the tiny but mighty agents in this transformation is yeast. In the presence of water, yeast ferments the sugars present in the flour and other ingredients, producing carbon dioxide (CO2) and alcohol as byproducts. This process is known as fermentation.

The trapped CO2 gas bubbles inflate the dough, contributing to its rise and soft texture. The alcohol mostly evaporates during the baking process. These reactions are temperature-dependent; too cold, and the yeast slows down; too hot, and it may die, which is why optimal proofing temperatures, like 28°C mentioned in the textbook exercise, are crucial.

It's the balance of ingredients, the quality of the yeast, and the control of environmental factors that lead to the perfect loaf of bread. When students struggle with understanding the effect of temperature or ingredient variations on fermentation, they are encouraged to directly connect the change in conditions with the change in the rate of biochemical reactions involving yeast.
Specific Volume Calculation
Critical to the quality of bread is its texture, which is gauged by its specific volume. To calculate the specific volume, you'd typically use the formula for the volume of a cylinder, \(V = \pi r^2 h\), where \(r\) is the radius, and \(h\) is the height. After finding the volume, you divide it by the mass of the dough to get the specific volume, \(v_{sp} = V/m\).

In the exercise, the bread dough increases in volume due to the gas produced by the yeast during proofing. By tracking the volume of gas produced per minute and multiplying it by the proofing time, you can determine the change in the dough's volume over time. This allows you to update the specific volume calculation with the new total volume, ensuring accurate results.

Understanding the mathematics behind specific volume calculations allows students to predict the textural outcome of their bread, making it an excellent exercise in connecting mathematical theory with practical applications in culinary science.
Protein Network Formation
During the bread-making process, one of the critical steps is the mixing or kneading of the dough. This step is crucial for protein network formation, primarily involving the proteins gliadin and glutenin found in wheat flour. When water is added, these proteins link together to form gluten, a stretchy network that gives the dough elasticity and helps trap the CO2 produced by the yeast during fermentation.

Extended mixing times can strengthen this protein network. However, there's a trade-off in commercial bread-making, where time equates to cost. Overmixing can not only be expensive in terms of energy and operational efficiency but can also negatively affect texture, turning the final product tough or chewy.

When educating students on this concept, it is crucial to put emphasis on the balance between under and over-kneading. Hands-on experimentation, where learners knead the dough for different durations, can be an enlightening and tactile way to grasp the importance of protein network development in bread making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The label has come off a cylinder of gas in your laboratory. You know only that one species of gas is contained in the cylinder, but you do not know whether it is hydrogen, oxygen, or nitrogen. To find out, you evacuate a 5 -liter flask, seal it and weigh it, then let gas from the cylinder flow into it until the gauge pressure equals 1.00 atm. The flask is reweighed, and the mass of the added gas is found to be 13.0g. Room temperature is \(27^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and barometric pressure is 1.00 atm. What is the gas?

A stream of oxygen enters a compressor at \(298 \mathrm{K}\) and 1.00 atm at a rate of \(127 \mathrm{m}^{3} / \mathrm{h}\) and is compressed to \(358 \mathrm{K}\) and 1000 atm. Estimate the volumetric flow rate of compressed \(\mathrm{O}_{2},\) using the compressibility-factor equation of state.

When a liquid or a gas occupies a volume, it may be assumed to fill the volume completely. On the other hand, when solid particles occupy a volume, there are always spaces (voids) among the particles. The porosity or void fraction of a bed of particles is the ratio (void volume)/(total bed volume). The bulk density of the solids is the ratio (mass of solids)/(total bed volume), and the absolute density of the solids has the usual definition (mass of solids)/(volume of solids). Suppose \(600.0 \mathrm{g}\) of a crushed ore is placed in a graduated cylinder, filling it to the \(184 \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) level. One hundred \(\mathrm{cm}^{3}\) of water is then added to the cylinder, whereupon the water level is observed to be at the \(233.5 \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) mark. Calculate the porosity of the dry particle bed, the bulk density of the ore in this bed, and the absolute density of the ore.

The quantity of sulfuric acid used globally places it among the most plentiful of all commodity chemicals. In the modern chemical industry, synthesis of most sulfuric acid utilizes elemental sulfur as a feedstock. However, an alternative and historically important source of sulfuric acid was the conversion of an ore containing iron pyrites (FeS_) to sulfur oxides by roasting (burning) the ore with air. The following reactions occurred in an oven: $$\begin{array}{c} 2 \mathrm{FeS}_{2}(\mathrm{s})+\frac{11}{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}(\mathrm{g}) \rightarrow \mathrm{Fe}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}(\mathrm{s})+4 \mathrm{SO}_{2}(\mathrm{g}) \\ \mathrm{SO}_{2}(\mathrm{g})+\frac{1}{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}(\mathrm{g}) \rightarrow \mathrm{SO}_{3}(\mathrm{g}) \end{array}$$ The gases leaving the oven were fed to a catalytic converter in which most of the remaining \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) produced was oxidized to \(\mathrm{SO}_{3}\). Finally, the gas leaving the converter was sent to an absorption column where the \(S O_{3}\) was taken up by water to produce sulfuric acid \(\left(H_{2} S O_{4}\right)\) (a) The ore fed to the oven was 90.0 wt\% \(\mathrm{FeS}_{2}\), and the remaining material may be considered inert. Dry air was fed to the oven in \(30.0 \%\) excess of the amount required to oxidize all of the sulfur in the ore to \(S O_{3}\). Eighty-five percent of the \(\mathrm{FeS}_{2}\) was oxidized, and \(60 \%\) of the \(\mathrm{SO}_{2}\) produced was oxidized to \(S O_{3}\). Leaving the roaster were (i) a gas stream containing \(S O_{2}, S O_{3}, O_{2},\) and \(N_{2}\) and (ii) a solid stream containing unconverted pyrites, ferric oxide \(\left(\mathrm{Fe}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{3}\right),\) and the inert material. Calculate the required feed rate of air in standard cubic meters per \(100 \mathrm{kg}\) of ore fed to the process. Also determine the molar composition and volume (SCM/100 kg ore) of the gas leaving the oven. (b) The gas leaving the oven entered the catalytic converter, which operated at 1.0 atm. Reaction (2) proceeded to equilibrium, at which point the component partial pressures are related by the expression $$K_{\mathrm{P}}(T)=\frac{p_{\mathrm{SO}_{3}}}{p_{\mathrm{SO}_{3}} p_{\mathrm{O}_{2}}^{0.5}}$$ The gases were first heated to \(600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to accelerate the rate of reaction, and then cooled to \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to enhance \(S O_{2}\) conversion. The equilibrium constant \(K_{\mathrm{P}}\) at these two temperatures is 9.53 atm \(^{0.5}\) and 397 atm \(^{0.5}\), respectively. Calculate the equilibrium fractional conversions of \(S O_{2}\) at these two temperatures. (c) Estimate the production rate of sulfuric acid in \(\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{kg}\) ore if all of the \(\mathrm{SO}_{3}\) leaving the converter was transformed to sulfuric acid. What would this value be if all the sulfur in the ore had been converted?

Ethane at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and 1.1 atm (abs) flowing at a rate of \(100 \mathrm{mol} / \mathrm{s}\) is burned with \(20 \%\) excess oxygen at \(175^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and 1.1 atm \((\text { abs }) .\) The combustion products leave the furnace at \(800^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and 1 atm. (a) What is the volumetric flow rate of oxygen (L/s) fed to the furnace? (b) What should the volumetric flow rate of the combustion products be? State all assumptions you make. (c) The volumetric flow rate of the combustion products is measured and found to be different from the value calculated in Part (b). Assuming that no mistakes were made in the calculation, what could be going on that could lead to the discrepancy? Consider assumptions made in the calculations and things that can go wrong in a real system.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.