/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 75 A catalytic reactor is used to p... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A catalytic reactor is used to produce formaldehyde from methanol in the reaction $$\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH} \rightarrow \mathrm{HCHO}+\mathrm{H}_{2}$$ A single-pass conversion of \(60.0 \%\) is achieved in the reactor. The methanol in the reactor product is separated from the formaldehyde and hydrogen in a multiple-unit process. The production rate of formaldehyde is 900.0 kg/h. (a) Calculate the required feed rate of methanol to the process ( \(\mathrm{kmol} / \mathrm{h}\) ) if there is no recycle. (b) Suppose the unreacted methanol is recovered and recycled to the reactor and the single-pass conversion remains 60\%. Without doing any calculations, prove that you have enough information to determine the required fresh feed rate of methanol (kmol/h) and the rates (kmol/h) at which methanol enters and leaves the reactor. Then perform the calculations. (c) The single-pass conversion in the reactor, \(X_{\mathrm{sp}},\) affects the costs of the reactor \(\left(C_{\mathrm{r}}\right)\) and the separation process and recycle line \(\left(C_{\mathrm{s}}\right) .\) What effect would you expect an increased \(X_{\mathrm{sp}}\) would have on each of these costs for a fixed formaldehyde production rate? (Hint: To get a \(100 \%\) singlepass conversion you would need an infinitely large reactor, and lowering the single-pass conversion leads to a need to process greater amounts of fluid through both process units and the recycle line.) What would you expect a plot of \(\left(C_{\mathrm{r}}+C_{\mathrm{s}}\right)\) versus \(X_{\mathrm{sp}}\) to look like? What does the design specification \(X_{\mathrm{sp}}=60 \%\) probably represent?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) The required feed rate of methanol for the process (without recycling) is calculated using the yield and single-pass conversion rate. \nvb) With recycling, fresh feed rate of methanol and the rates at which methanol enters and leaves the reactor can all be obtained from the mass balance equation. \nc) The effect of single-pass conversion on costs can be deduced as an increased single pass conversion would increase reactor costs due to more required conversion but decrease separation and recycle costs due to less methanol present to separate and recycle. The resulting cost curve would be a trade-off between these two competing costs, introducing an optimal single-pass conversion. The specified 60% single pass conversion likely represents this optimal operational point.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate required feed rate of Methanol

First, find the amount of methanol required using the yield relation as \( Yield = \frac{Formaldehyde}{Methanol} \), for no recycle. A single-pass conversion of 60% is mentioned which means that 60% of the initial methanol is converted to formaldehyde. Using this relationship and the production rate of formaldehyde, we can find the feed rate for methanol.
02

Calculate fresh feed rate of Methanol with recycling

The conversion ratio still remains at 60% when the unreacted methanol is recovered and recycled. The flow rates can be determined based on this percentage, and the principle of mass conservation can be used to establish relations between the reactants and products at the reactor inlet and outlet.
03

Effect of Single-pass conversion on cost

We then address how an increase in single-pass conversion, \(X_{sp}\), would impact the costs of the reactor, \(C_{r}\), and the separation process, \(C_{s}\). An intuitive understanding of the system helps in interpreting the effects of increasing converter efficiency on system costs. The cost versus conversion curve is a common concept in industrial processes which must also be discussed here.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Catalytic Reactor
A catalytic reactor is a specialized vessel designed to carry out chemical reactions with the help of a catalyst. In the context of formaldehyde production, the catalyst facilitates the conversion of methanol into formaldehyde and hydrogen. It speeds up the reaction by lowering the activation energy needed, without being consumed in the process.
Catalytic reactors come in various forms, such as fixed-bed, fluidized-bed, and tubular designs, each suited to different types of reactions and operating conditions. The choice of reactor impacts the efficiency and yield of the desired product.
  • Fixed-Bed Reactors: These contain a packed bed of catalyst and are ideal for gas phase reactions.
  • Fluidized-Bed Reactors: In these, a fluidized state of solid catalyst particles offers better heat and mass transfer.
  • Tubular Reactors: These are used for reactions occurring in a continuous flow of materials through a tube filled with catalyst.
Understanding the role of the catalytic reactor in your chemical process is key to optimizing production and efficiency.
Formaldehyde Production
Formaldehyde production from methanol occurs via a chemical reaction where methanol is converted into formaldehyde and hydrogen. The reaction can be represented as \(\mathrm{CH}_{3}\mathrm{OH} \rightarrow \mathrm{HCHO} + \mathrm{H}_{2}\).
Formaldehyde is an important industrial chemical used in the production of resins, plastics, and preservatives.
The efficiency of formaldehyde production is significantly affected by various factors:
  • Reaction Temperature: High temperatures generally increase the conversion rate but may also lead to side reactions.
  • Pressure: Optimal pressures can enhance the rate of reaction.
  • Catalyst: The type and condition of the catalyst influence the speed and selectivity of the reaction.
Maintaining controlled reaction conditions is critical to achieving high yields of formaldehyde.
Single-Pass Conversion
Single-pass conversion refers to the percentage of a reactant converted into a product during one pass through the reactor. For the methanol-to-formaldehyde reaction, a 60% single-pass conversion means that 60% of the methanol feed is converted into formaldehyde in one pass through the catalytic reactor.
A higher single-pass conversion is desired because it decreases the amount of unreacted methanol, which needs separation and possible recycling. However, reaching 100% single-pass conversion is unrealistic, as it would require an infinitely large reactor, driving up costs significantly.
The conversion efficiency is a balancing act between improving reactor performance and managing costs. Generally, increasing single-pass conversion reduces the volume needing recycling, thereby lowering separation costs but potentially increasing reactor costs when trying to achieve near-complete conversion.
Methanol Feed Rate
The methanol feed rate is the amount of methanol fed into the reactor over a specified time, usually expressed in kmol/h. It is crucial for determining the production scale and ensuring adequate amounts are available to meet demand.
To calculate the required methanol feed rate, we use the production target for formaldehyde and the single-pass conversion rate. For example, if you desire a formaldehyde production rate of 900 kg/h and the single-pass conversion is 60%, the methanol feed rate must be calculated to ensure enough reactant is available to meet this target.
With recycling systems in place, the initial methanol feed rate might be adjusted since unreacted methanol can be circulated back to the reactor. This affects the fresh feed rate, as the effective rate might differ significantly from the initial input when recycling unreacted methanol.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) are among the most versatile building blocks in nanotechnology. These unique pure carbon materials resemble rolled-up sheets of graphite with diameters of several nanometers and lengths up to several micrometers. They are stronger than steel, have higher thermal conductivities than most known materials, and have electrical conductivities like that of copper but with higher currentcarrying capacity. Molecular transistors and biosensors are among their many applications. While most carbon nanotube research has been based on laboratory-scale synthesis, commercial applications involve large industrial-scale processes. In one such process, carbon monoxide saturated with an organo-metallic compound (iron penta-carbonyl) is decomposed at high temperature and pressure to form CNT, amorphous carbon, and CO_. Each "molecule" of CNT contains roughly 3000 carbon atoms. The reactions by which such molecules are formed are: In the process to be analyzed, a fresh feed of CO saturated with \(\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CO})_{5}(\mathrm{v})\) contains \(19.2 \mathrm{wt} \%\) of the latter component. The feed is joined by a recycle stream of pure CO and fed to the reactor, where all of the iron penta-carbonyl decomposes. Based on laboratory data, \(20.0 \%\) of the CO fed to the reactor is converted, and the selectivity of CNT to amorphous carbon production is (9.00 kmol CNT/kmol C). The reactor effluent passes through a complex separation process that yields three product streams: one consists of solid \(\mathrm{CNT}, \mathrm{C},\) and \(\mathrm{Fe} ;\) a second is \(\mathrm{CO}_{2} ;\) and the third is the recycled \(\mathrm{CO}\). You wish to determine the flow rate of the fresh feed (SCM/h), the total CO_ generated in the process ( \(\mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{h}\) ), and the ratio (kmol CO recycled/kmol CO in fresh feed). (a) Take a basis of \(100 \mathrm{kmol}\) fresh feed. Draw and fully label a process flow chart and do degree-offreedom analyses for the overall process, the fresh-feed/recycle mixing point, the reactor, and the separation process. Base the analyses for reactive systems on atomic balances. (b) Write and solve overall balances, and then scale the process to calculate the flow rate (SCM/h) of fresh feed required to produce \(1000 \mathrm{kg} \mathrm{CNT} / \mathrm{h}\) and the mass flow rate of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) that would be produced. (c) In your degree-of-freedom analysis of the reactor, you might have counted separate balances for C (atomic carbon) and O (atomic oxygen). In fact, those two balances are not independent, so one but not both of them should be counted. Revise your analysis if necessary, and then calculate the ratio (kmol CO recycled/kmol CO in fresh feed). (d) Prove that the atomic carbon and oxygen balances on the reactor are not independent equations.

A mixture of propane and butane is burned with pure oxygen. The combustion products contain 47.4 mole \(\% \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\). After all the water is removed from the products, the residual gas contains 69.4 mole \(\% \mathrm{CO}_{2}\) and the balance \(\mathrm{O}_{2}\) (a) What is the mole percent of propane in the fuel? (b) It now turns out that the fuel mixture may contain not only propane and butane but also other hydrocarbons. All that is certain is that there is no oxygen in the fuel. Use atomic balances to calculate the elemental molar composition of the fuel from the given combustion product analysis (i.e., what mole percent is \(C\) and what percent is \(\mathrm{H}\) ). Prove that your solution is consistent with the result of Part (a).

Two streams flow into a 500 -gallon tank. The first stream is 10.0 wt\% ethanol and \(90.0 \%\) hexane (the mixture density, \(\rho_{1},\) is \(0.68 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) ) and the second is \(90.0 \mathrm{wt} \%\) ethanol, \(10.0 \%\) hexane \(\left(\rho_{2}=0.78 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\right) .\) After the tank has been filled, which takes 22 \(\mathrm{min}\), an analysis of its contents determines that the mixture is 60.0 wt\% ethanol, \(40.0 \%\) hexane. You wish to estimate the density of the final mixture and the mass and volumetric flow rates of the two feed streams. (a) Draw and label a flowchart of the mixing process and do the degree-of- freedom analysis. (b) Perform the calculations and state what you assumed.

A \(100 \mathrm{kmol} / \mathrm{h}\) stream that is 97 mole \(\%\) carbon tetrachloride \(\left(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\right)\) and \(3 \%\) carbon disulfide \(\left(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\right)\) is to be recovered from the bottom of a distillation column. The feed to the column is 16 mole \(\% \mathrm{CS}_{2}\) and \(84 \% \mathrm{CCl}_{4},\) and \(2 \%\) of the \(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\) entering the column is contained in the overhead stream leaving the top of the column. (a) Draw and label a flowchart of the process and do the degree-of-freedom analysis. (b) Calculate the mass and mole fractions of \(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\) in the overhead stream, and determine the molar flow rates of \(\mathrm{CCl}_{4}\) and \(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\) in the overhead and feed streams. (c) Suppose the overhead stream is analyzed and the mole fraction of \(\mathrm{CS}_{2}\) is found to be significantly lower than the value calculated in Part (b). List as many reasons as you can for the discrepancy, including possible violations of assumptions made in Part (b).

Methanol is synthesized from carbon monoxide and hydrogen in a catalytic reactor. The fresh feed to the process contains 32.0 mole \(\%\) CO, \(64.0 \%\) H \(_{2}\), and \(4.0 \%\) Ne. This stream is mixed with a recycle stream in a ratio 5 mol recycle/ 1 mol fresh feed to produce the feed to the reactor, which contains 13.0 mole\% \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\). A low single-pass conversion is attained in the reactor. The reactor effluent goes to a condenser from which two streams emerge: a liquid product stream containing essentially all the methanol formed in the reactor, and a gas stream containing all the \(\mathrm{CO}, \mathrm{H}_{2}\), and \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\) leaving the reactor. The gas stream is split into two fractions: one is removed from the process as a purge stream, and the other is the recycle stream that combines with the fresh feed to the reactor. (a) Assume a methanol production rate of \(100 \mathrm{kmol} / \mathrm{h}\). Perform the DOF for the overall system and all subsystems to prove that there is insufficient information to solve for all unknowns. (b) Briefly explain in your own words the reasons for including (i) the recycle stream and (ii) the purge stream in the process design.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.