/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 68 Ethane is chlorinated in a conti... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Ethane is chlorinated in a continuous reactor: $$\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{6}+\mathrm{Cl}_{2} \rightarrow \mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{Cl}+\mathrm{HCl}$$ Some of the product monochloroethane is further chlorinated in an undesired side reaction: $$\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{Cl}+\mathrm{Cl}_{2} \rightarrow \mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}+\mathrm{HCl}$$ (a) Suppose your principal objective is to maximize the selectivity of monochloroethane production relative to dichloroethane production. Would you design the reactor for a high or low conversion of ethane? Explain your answer. (Hint: If the reactor contents remained in the reactor long enough for most of the ethane in the feed to be consumed, what would the main product constituent probably be?) What additional processing steps would almost certainly be carried out to make the process economically sound? (b) Take a basis of \(100 \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{Cl}\) produced. Assume that the feed contains only ethane and chlorine and that all of the chlorine is consumed, and carry out a degree-of-freedom analysis based on atomic species balances. (c) The reactor is designed to yield a \(15 \%\) conversion of ethane and a selectivity of \(14 \mathrm{mol} \mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{5} \mathrm{Cl} / \mathrm{mol}\) \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2},\) with a negligible amount of chlorine in the product gas. Calculate the feed ratio \(\left(\mathrm{mol} \mathrm{Cl}_{2} /\right.\) mol \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{6}\) ) and the fractional yield of monochloroethane. (d) Suppose the reactor is built and started up and the conversion is only \(14 \% .\) Chromatographic analysis shows that there is no \(\mathrm{Cl}_{2}\) in the product but another species with a molecular weight higher than that of dichloroethane is present. Offer a likely explanation for these results.

Short Answer

Expert verified
For maximum selectivity of monochloroethane, it is advantageous to design the reactor for a low ethane conversion rate to prevent dichloroethane's formation. A potential additional step might be the implementation of a separation process after the reactor. The degree of freedom analysis shows that there's one degree of freedom. For a 15% conversion, the feed ratio will be the ratio of chlorine consumed to the ethane reacted. The fractional yield is the ratio of the product formation to the reactant consumption. The results showing lower conversion and heavier product species indicate the possibility of unaccounted side reactions, consuming more feed and producing unexpected products.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing readability for optimum selectivity

Selectivity is a term in chemical engineering that describes the relative rate at which a reactant is consumed in different reaction pathways. In order to optimize the process for the formation of monochloroethane, the reactor would likely be designed for a low conversion of ethane. This is because, in continuous reactors, the reaction time is inversely proportional to the conversion of the limiting reactant. If the ethane is consumed rapidly (high conversion), the contents of the reactor would be composed mostly of products, allowing for the side reaction to occur and produce dichloroethane. An additional processing step to make the method more economically sound might be the implementation of a separation process after the reactor to separate and recycle unreacted ethane.
02

Calculating degree of freedom for atomic species balances

The atomic species balance equations can be written as follows, based on the reactions:For Carbon: \(1*\) (Mol of \(C_2 H_6\)) + 0 = 1* (Mol of \(C_2 H_5 Cl\)) + 2 * (Mol of \(C_2 H_4 Cl_2\)) For Hydrogen: \(6*\) (Mol of \(C_2 H_6\)) = 5* (Mol of \(C_2 H_5 Cl\)) + 4 * (Mol of \(C_2 H_4 Cl_2\)) + 1 * (Mol of HCl) For Chlorine: \(2*\) (Mol of \(Cl_2\)) = 1* (Mol of \(C_2 H_5 Cl\)) + 2 * (Mol of \(C_2 H_4 Cl_2\)) + 1 * (Mol of HCl) In this case, since the basis has been set as 100 mol \(C_2 H_5 Cl\), there are 3 equations (for each element: C,H,Cl) and 4 unknowns (mol \(C_2 H_6\), mol \(Cl_2\), mol \(C_2 H_4 Cl_2\) and mol HCl).
03

Calculate the feed ratio

The feed ratio can be calculated by the stoichiometry of the reactions. Given 15% conversion, we first need to calculate mol of \(C_2 H_{6}\), mol of \(C_2 H_{4} Cl_{2}\) and mol of Cl_{2}\. With the selectivity of 14 mol \(C_{2} H_{5} Cl_{2}\) per mol of \(C_{2} H_{4} Cl_{2}\), we can find that mol \(C_{2} H_{4} Cl_{2} = 100/14\). Consequently, mol \(C_{2} H_{6}\) = mol \(C_{2} H_{5} Cl_{2}\) + mol \(C_{2} H_{4} Cl_{2}\). The result then can be used to calculate the molar of \(Cl_{2}\) = mol \(C_{2} H_{5} Cl_{2}\) + 2*\(C_{2} H_{4} Cl_{2}\). Thus, feed ratio can be calculated by dividing mol \(Cl_{2}\) by mol \(C_{2} H_{6}\).
04

Calculate the fractional yield of monochloroethane

The fractional yield is given by the moles of \(C_2 H_5 Cl\) produced over the moles of ethane reacted. From the stoichiometry of the reaction, for every 1 mol of ethane reacted, 1 mol of monochloroethane is produced. Thus, fractional yield = mol \(C_2 H_5 Cl\)/ mol \(C_2 H_6\).
05

Explanation for the change in reaction conditions

If the conversion is less than expected and there are species with higher molecular weight than expected in the product, there might have been additional side reactions producing heavier compounds. The presence of these heavy species might be the reason for reduced conversion. Additionally, the absence of Cl2 suggests that chlorine has been entirely consumed, possibly in those side reactions resulting in heavier products.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Selectivity in Reactions
In chemical reaction engineering, selectivity is crucial when it comes to optimizing production processes. Selectivity determines which products are formed by controlling how reactants are distributed among the possible pathways.
Selectivity can be defined as the ratio of desired product formation to the side or undesired product formation. For example, in the chlorination process of ethane, forming monochloroethane while minimizing dichloroethane is the goal.
To achieve high selectivity, you can balance reaction conditions. Usually, limiting the conversion of reactants like ethane can help, as a high conversion often leads to more by-products. By designing for lower conversion, the reactor reduces the chances of ethane being turned into secondary, undesired products. This means less time for side reactions to occur.
In practical applications, additional steps like separation processes may be necessary. This recycles unreacted materials back into the system. Improving selectivity is not just about reactor conditions but also integrating downstream processes that enhance economic viability.
Chlorination Process
Chlorination is a process where chlorine is added to a molecule, often improving or introducing new properties. In the ethane chlorination process, chlorine reacts with ethane to produce monochloroethane and hydrogen chloride as the primary products.
This reaction is sensitive to conditions such as reaction time and chlorine concentration. Adjusting these parameters helps maximize the desired product and minimize unwanted side reactions, such as forming dichloroethane. The key is to stop the reaction at a point where further chlorination, leading to undesirable products, does not predominantly occur.
Various methods can be used to control the chlorination process, including:
  • Managing reactant ratios: Carefully controlling the ratio of ethane to chlorine.
  • Temperature control: Keeping the reaction at an optimal temperature to favor selective reaction paths.
  • Reaction time management: Ensuring the reaction does not proceed beyond desired levels of product formation.
Overall, understanding and manipulating the chlorination process are essential for optimizing outcomes in industrial applications.
Degree of Freedom Analysis
In chemical engineering, degree of freedom analysis is a method used to determine how many variables can be set independently in a system. For reactions, this involves breaking down components and tracking the number of equations versus unknowns.
To conduct a degree of freedom analysis for the ethane chlorination process, start by identifying atomic species involved: carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and chlorine (Cl). Each element provides a balance equation.
For instance, you have three balance equations for the three elements involved. However, there are also four unknowns to solve for: the moles of ethane, chlorine, dichloroethane, and hydrogen chloride. The difference between equations and unknowns dictates your degree of freedom. Here it results in one degree of freedom, meaning you need additional information or assumptions—like conversion rates—to solve the system fully.
This analysis helps you understand the complexity of a chemical process, assisting in designing reactors and optimizing conditions for specific outcomes.
Stoichiometry in Chemical Reactions
Stoichiometry is the quantitative relationship between reactants and products in a chemical reaction. It is foundational for calculating the quantities needed and predicting the yields of a reaction.
In reactions like ethane chlorination, stoichiometry is utilized to balance the chemical equations, ensuring mass conservation according to the law of conservation of mass. It helps in determining the proportional amounts of each substance needed to react completely.
For example, the stoichiometry of the ethane-chlorine system can be represented by the reaction equations. This helps quantify the number of moles of each reactant and product. With a known conversion or selectivity target, stoichiometry can be used to calculate the input amounts and expected output.
When you calculate the feed ratio or fractional yields, stoichiometry provides the framework for those calculations. It tells you how much of a reactant is converted into a particular product, considering all other products formed by side reactions. This is vital for designing efficient industrial chemical processes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two streams flow into a 500 -gallon tank. The first stream is 10.0 wt\% ethanol and \(90.0 \%\) hexane (the mixture density, \(\rho_{1},\) is \(0.68 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) ) and the second is \(90.0 \mathrm{wt} \%\) ethanol, \(10.0 \%\) hexane \(\left(\rho_{2}=0.78 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\right) .\) After the tank has been filled, which takes 22 \(\mathrm{min}\), an analysis of its contents determines that the mixture is 60.0 wt\% ethanol, \(40.0 \%\) hexane. You wish to estimate the density of the final mixture and the mass and volumetric flow rates of the two feed streams. (a) Draw and label a flowchart of the mixing process and do the degree-of- freedom analysis. (b) Perform the calculations and state what you assumed.

Liquid methanol is fed to a space heater at a rate of \(12.0 \mathrm{L} / \mathrm{h}\) and burned with excess air. The product gas is analyzed and the following dry-basis mole percentages are determined: \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{OH}=0.45 \%\) \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}=9.03 \%,\) and \(\mathrm{CO}=1.81 \%\) (a) Draw and label a flowchart and verify that the system has zero degrees of freedom. (b) Calculate the fractional conversion of methanol, the percentage excess air fed, and the mole fraction of water in the product gas. (c) Suppose the combustion products are released directly into a room. What potential problems do you see and what remedies can you suggest?

In an absorption tower (or absorber), a gas is contacted with a liquid under conditions such that one or more species in the gas dissolve in the liquid. A stripping tower (or stripper) also involves a gas contacting a liquid, but under conditions such that one or more components of the feed liquid come out of solution and exit in the gas leaving the tower. A process consisting of an absorption tower and a stripping tower is used to separate the components of a gas containing 30.0 mole \(\%\) carbon dioxide and the balance methane. A stream of this gas is fed to the bottom of the absorber. A liquid containing 0.500 mole\% dissolved \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) and the balance methanol is recycled from the bottom of the stripper and fed to the top of the absorber. The product gas leaving the top of the absorber contains 1.00 mole \(\% \mathrm{CO}_{2}\) and essentially all of the methane fed to the unit. The CO_-rich liquid solvent leaving the bottom of the absorber is fed to the top of the stripper and a stream of nitrogen gas is fed to the bottom. Ninety percent of the \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) in the liquid feed to the stripper comes out of solution in the column, and the nitrogen/CO_stream leaving the column passes out to the atmosphere through a stack. The liquid stream leaving the stripping tower is the \(0.500 \% \mathrm{CO}_{2}\) solution recycled to the absorber. The absorber operates at temperature \(T_{\mathrm{a}}\) and pressure \(P_{\mathrm{a}}\) and the stripper operates at \(T_{\mathrm{s}}\) and \(P_{\mathrm{s}}\) Methanol may be assumed to be nonvolatile- -that is, none enters the vapor phase in either column and \(\mathrm{N}_{2}\), may be assumed insoluble in methanol. (a) In your own words, explain the overall objective of this two-unit process and the functions of the absorber and stripper in the process. (b) The streams fed to the tops of each tower have something in common, as do the streams fed to the bottoms of each tower. What are these commonalities and what is the probable reason for them? (c) Taking a basis of 100 mol/h of gas fed to the absorber, draw and label a flowchart of the process. For the stripper outlet gas, label the component molar flow rates rather than the total flow rate and mole fractions. Do the degree-of-freedom analysis and write in order the equations you would solve to determine all unknown stream variables except the nitrogen flow rate entering and leaving the stripper. Circle the variable(s) for which you would solve each equation (or set of simultaneous equations), but don't do any of the calculations yet. (d) Calculate the fractional \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) removal in the absorber (moles absorbed/mole in gas feed) and the molar flow rate and composition of the liquid feed to the stripping tower. (e) Calculate the molar feed rate of gas to the absorber required to produce an absorber product gas flow rate of \(1000 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{h}\). (f) Would you guess that \(T_{\mathrm{s}}\) would be higher or lower than \(T_{\mathrm{a}} ?\) Explain. (Hint: Think about what happens when you heat a carbonated soft drink and what you want to happen in the stripper.) What about the relationship of \(P_{\mathrm{s}}\) to \(P_{\mathrm{a}} ?\) (g) What properties of methanol would you guess make it the solvent of choice for this process? (In more general terms, what would you look for when choosing a solvent for an absorption-stripping process to separate one gas from another?)

Two aqueous sulfuric acid solutions containing \(20.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}(\mathrm{SG}=1.139)\) and \(60.0 \mathrm{wt} \% \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4}\) (SG = 1.498) are mixed to form a 4.00 molar solution (SG = 1.213). (a) Calculate the mass fraction of sulfuric acid in the product solution. (b) Taking \(100 \mathrm{kg}\) of the \(20 \%\) feed solution as a basis, draw and label a flowchart of this process, labeling both masses and volumes, and do the degree-of-freedom analysis. Calculate the feed ratio (liters 20\% solution/liter 60\% solution). (c) What feed rate of the \(60 \%\) solution (L/h) would be required to produce \(1250 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{h}\) of the product?

A liquid mixture containing 30.0 mole \(\%\) benzene \((\mathrm{B}), 25.0 \%\) toluene \((\mathrm{T}),\) and the balance xylene \((\mathrm{X})\) is fed to a distillation column. The bottoms product contains 98.0 mole \(\% \mathrm{X}\) and no \(\mathrm{B},\) and \(96.0 \%\) of the \(\mathrm{X}\) in the feed is recovered in this stream. The overhead product is fed to a second column. The overhead product from the second column contains \(97.0 \%\) of the \(\mathrm{B}\) in the feed to this column. The composition of this stream is 94.0 mole\% B and the balance T. (a) Draw and label a flowchart of this process and do the degree-of-freedom analysis to prove that for an assumed basis of calculation, molar flow rates and compositions of all process streams can be calculated from the given information. Write in order the equations you would solve to calculate unknown process variables. In each equation (or pair of simultaneous equations), circle the variable(s) for which you would solve. Do not do the calculations. (b) Calculate (i) the percentage of the benzene in the process feed (i.e., the feed to the first column) that emerges in the overhead product from the second column and (ii) the percentage of toluene in the process feed that emerges in the bottom product from the second column.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.