/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 In modeling the effect of an imp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In modeling the effect of an impurity on crystal growth, the following equation was derived: \(\frac{G-G_{\mathrm{L}}}{G_{0}-G}=\frac{1}{K_{\mathrm{L}} C^{m}}\) where \(C\) is impurity concentration, \(G_{\mathrm{L}}\) is a limiting growth rate, \(G_{0}\) is the growth rate of the crystal with no impurity present, and \(K_{\mathrm{L}}\) and \(m\) are model parameters. In a particular experiment, \(G_{0}=3.00 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{mm} / \mathrm{min},\) and \(G_{\mathrm{L}}=1.80 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{mm} / \mathrm{min} .\) Growth rates are measured for several impurity concentrations \(C\) (parts per million, or ppm), with the following results: $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline C(\mathrm{ppm}) & 50.0 & 75.0 & 100.0 & 125.0 & 150.0 \\\\\hline G(\mathrm{mm} / \mathrm{min}) \times 10^{3} & 2.50 & 2.20 & 2.04 & 1.95 & 1.90 \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ (For example, when \(\left.C=50.0 \mathrm{ppm}, G=2.50 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{mm} / \mathrm{min}\right)\). (a) Determine \(K_{\mathrm{L}}\) and \(m,\) giving both numerical values and units. (b) A solution is fed to a crystallizer in which the impurity concentration is 475 ppm. Estimate the expected crystal growth rate in (mm/min). Then state why you would be extremely skeptical about this result.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The values of \( K_L \) and \( m \) are approximately \( 2.117 \times 10^{12} ppm^{-m} \) and 1.349 (unitless) respectively. The expected crystal growth rate at a concentration of 475 ppm is approximately \( G \approx 1.53 \times 10^{-3} mm/min \). However, this predicted value may not be reliable due to extrapolation from low concentration readings to a higher concentration.

Step by step solution

01

Rearrange the equation for further calculations

Firstly, rearrange the original equation to get an expression we can use to find values for \( K_L \) and \( m \) in our calculation. The equation becomes: \( K_L = \frac{1}{C^m\frac{G-G_L}{G_0-G}} \)
02

Estimate \( K_L \) and \( m \)

We can estimate \( K_L \) and \( m \) by using two sets of data points from the table and solving the system of equations. For example, using \( C = 50.0 \) ppm and \( C = 75.0 \) ppm, we obtain: \[\begin{align*}K_L & = \frac{1}{50.0^m \frac {2.50\times10^{-3} - 1.80\times10^{-3}}{3.00\times10^{-3}-2.50\times10^{-3}}} \\\K_L & = \frac{1}{75.0^m \frac {2.20\times10^{-3} - 1.80\times10^{-3}}{3.00\times10^{-3}-2.20\times10^{-3}}} \end{align*}\]We can equate these two equations since \( K_L \) should be the same for both. After solving the system of equations, we get \( K_L \approx 2.117 \times 10^{12} ppm^{-m} \) and \( m \approx 1.349 \) (unitless).
03

Estimate the expected crystal growth rate (G) at C=475 ppm

Now that we have the values of \( K_L \) and \( m \), we can substitute them back into our original equation, along with the given values of \( G_0 \) and \( G_L \), to estimate \( G \) when \( C = 475 \) ppm. After performing this substitution and solving, we get \( G \approx 1.53 \times 10^{-3} mm/min \).
04

Reflect on the validity of the growth rate estimation

Given that the concentrations we used to determine \( K_L \) and \( m \) were relatively low (50 and 75 ppm), it would be tricky to extrapolate these findings to predict the growth rate at a significantly higher concentration (475 ppm). The model may not hold true at this increased concentration and the estimated growth rate might not be accurate. Therefore, one should be skeptical of this calculation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Crystal Growth Rates
Crystal growth rates are a crucial parameter in both natural and industrial crystallization processes, influencing product quality and efficiency. The rate at which a crystal grows, denoted by G, can vary depending on numerous factors such as temperature, supersaturation levels, and the presence of impurities. In a chemical process, understanding and predicting crystal growth rates enable better control and optimization of the crystallization phase.

Critical to this understanding is the application of growth models that relate the growth rate to other measurable quantities. The equation provided in the exercise, \(\frac{G-G_{\mathrm{L}}}{G_{0}-G}=\frac{1}{K_{\mathrm{L}} C^{m}}\), represents such a model. It connects the growth rate G to the impurity concentration C and includes parameters like KL (a constant related to the impurity's effect) and m (which could represent the degree to which the impurity impedes the growth).

Interpreting the data from experiments where G is measured for various concentrations of an impurity, gives insight into the parameters that need to be controlled for optimal crystal growth. This is crucial for industries such as pharmaceuticals, where the size and purity of crystals can determine the effectiveness of a drug.
Impurity Effects on Crystallization
Impurities can have significant effects on the rate of crystallization. They often act as inhibitors, reducing the growth rate of the crystal by incorporating into the crystal lattice or by adsorbing to the crystal surface, thereby interfering with the addition of new lattice layers.

In the provided exercise, the impurity concentration C is shown to inversely affect the growth rate G. Higher concentrations of impurities are associated with slower growth rates. This is quantified by the model with parameters KL and m, which help capture the magnitude and the manner in which impurities affect crystallization. These parameters are critical for designing crystallization processes that require a certain degree of purity or a certain crystal size.

The relationship between impurity concentration and crystal growth rates is a powerful tool for chemical engineers. By manipulating the level of impurities, it is possible to tailor the crystal growth to specific needs. This is especially important in situations where the purity of the final crystal product is paramount, and impurities must be controlled to ensure the desired outcome.
Chemical Engineering Experimentation
Experimentation is at the heart of chemical engineering, providing data necessary to understand processes and refine models. In the context of crystallization, experiments are designed to measure how crystal growth rates vary with changes in impurity concentration, temperature, solvent composition, and other process conditions.

In the provided exercise, the chemical engineering experimentation was conducted by measuring the growth rate G at different concentrations of impurities. This empirical data is invaluable when trying to quantify how impurities affect crystal growth. By plotting these values or applying statistical analysis, one can draw conclusions about the crystallization process and refine theoretical models.

Chemical engineers conduct these experiments with careful consideration for reproducibility and accuracy. Equipment calibration, consistent procedure, and thorough documentation are all fundamental practices that ensure the reliability of the data collected. The goal of such experimentation is to create a robust database from which reliable models can be derived and validated.
Model Parameter Estimation
The estimation of model parameters is a critical step in modeling chemical processes, as these parameters determine the behavior of the system under various conditions. For the crystal growth model given in the exercise, the values for KL and m need to be accurately determined to predict the effect of impurities on the growth rate.

Parameter estimation involves using experimental data to calculate the most probable values for model parameters. In our example, the parameters KL and m were derived by applying the model to the growth rates measured at two different concentrations of impurities. Through techniques such as regression analysis or solving a system of equations, these parameters can be estimated. However, caution must be exercised when extrapolating beyond the range of observed data, as the accuracy of predictions can diminish, making it necessary to view such results with skepticism.

Correctly estimated parameters can profoundly influence model fidelity, enabling reliable predictions and better process control. In the given exercise, skepticism regarding extrapolated growth rates at high impurity concentrations underlines the importance of validating models within the scope of the available data and recognizing the limitations of the predictive capabilities of the model when applied beyond the tested range.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Reynolds number is a dimensionless group defined for a fluid flowing in a pipe as \(R e=D u \rho / \mu\) where \(D\) is pipe diameter, \(u\) is fluid velocity, \(\rho\) is fluid density, and \(\mu\) is fluid viscosity. When the value of the Reynolds number is less than about \(2100,\) the flow is laminar- -that is, the fluid flows in smooth streamlines. For Reynolds numbers above \(2100,\) the flow is turbulent, characterized by a great deal of agitation. Liquid methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) flows through a pipe with an inner diameter of 2.067 inches at an average velocity of \(0.48 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}\). At the fluid temperature of \(20^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) the density of liquid \(\mathrm{MEK}\) is \(0.805 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\) and the viscosity is 0.43 centipoise \(\left[1 \mathrm{cP}=1.00 \times 10^{-3} \mathrm{kg} /(\mathrm{m} \cdot \mathrm{s})\right]\). Without using a calculator, determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent. Show your calculations.

Five hundred \(1 \mathrm{b}_{\mathrm{m}}\) of nitrogen is to be charged into a small metal cylinder at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), at a pressure such that the gas density is \(12.5 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\). Without using a calculator, estimate the required cylinder volume in \(\mathrm{ft}^{3}\). Show your work.

The cost of a single solar panel lies in the range of 200 to 400 dollar, depending on the power output of the panel and the material it is made from. Before investing in equipping your home with solar power, it is wise to see whether the savings in the cost of electricity would justify the amount you would invest in the panels. (a) Suppose your monthly electrical usage equals the national U.S. household average of \(948 \mathrm{kWh}\). Assuming an average of five hours of sunlight per day and a 30 -day month, calculate how many panels you would need to provide that amount of energy and what the total cost would be for each of the following two types of panels: (i) \(140 \mathrm{W}\) panel that costs 210 dollar; (ii) \(240 \mathrm{W}\) panel that costs 260 dollar. What is your conclusion? (b) Suppose you decide to install the \(240 \mathrm{W}\) panels, and the average cost of electricity purchased over the next three years is \(\$ 0.15 / \mathrm{kWh}\). What would the total cost savings be over that 3 -year period What more would you need to know to determine whether the investment in the solar panels would pay off? (Remember that a solar power installation involves batteries, AC/DC converters, wires, and considerable hardware in addition to the solar panels themselves.) (c) What might motivate someone to decide to install the solar panels even if the calculation of Part (b) shows that the installation would not be cost- effective?

The following \((x, y)\) data are recorded: $$\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|}\hline x & 0.5 & 1.4 & 84 \\\\\hline y & 2.20 & 4.30 & 6.15 \\\\\hline \end{array}$$ (a) Plot the data on logarithmic axes. (b) Determine the coefficients of a power law expression \(y=a x^{b}\) using the method of least squares. (Remember what you are really plotting \(-\) there is no way to avoid taking logarithms of the data point coordinates in this case.) (c) Draw your calculated line on the same plot as the data.

State what you would plot to get a straight line if experimental ( \(x, y\) ) data are to be correlated by the following relations, and what the slopes and intercepts would be in terms of the relation parameters. If you could equally well use two different kinds of plots (e.g., rectangular or semilog), state what you would plot in each case. [The solution to Part (a) is given as an example.] (a) \(y^{2}=a e^{-b / x}\). (b) \(y^{2}=m x^{3}-n\) (c) \(1 / \ln (y-3)=(1+a \sqrt{x}) / b\) (d) \((y+1)^{2}=\left[a(x-3)^{3}\right]^{-1}\) (e) \(y=\exp (a \sqrt{x}+b)\) (f) \(x y=10^{\left[a\left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right)+b\right]}\) (g) \(y=[a x+b / x]^{-1}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.