/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 75 (a) What is the physical basis f... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(a) What is the physical basis for the VSEPR model? (b) When applying the VSEPR model, we count a double or triple bond as a single electron domain. Why is this justified?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) The physical basis for the VSEPR model is the repulsion between negatively charged valence shell electron pairs, which arrange themselves to maintain a maximum distance between them, determining the three-dimensional shape of molecules. (b) Treating double and triple bonds as a single electron domain in the VSEPR model is justified because they have similar spatial constraints and repulsive force effects upon molecular geometry as a single bond does, despite having additional electron pairs.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Explanation of VSEPR Model's Physical Basis

The physical basis for the VSEPR model lies in the fact that electron pairs in the valence shell of an atom will repel each other due to their negative charges. Electrons being negatively charged, they will repel each other in order to minimize electrostatic force or repulsion. As a result, these valence shell electron pairs will arrange themselves in such a way to maintain a maximum distance between them, leading to distinct molecular geometries. Thus, the VSEPR model is built upon the concept of repulsion between valence shell electron pairs, which determines the three-dimensional shape of molecules.
02

(b) Justification for Treating Double and Triple Bonds as a Single Electron Domain

Although double and triple bonds involve more than one electron pair, they are still considered a single electron domain in the VSEPR model. There are two main reasons for this: 1. Molecular geometry is primarily influenced by repulsions between electron pairs, and since the electron pairs involved in bonding are usually closer to each other than to other nearby electron pairs, the repulsive force their interaction creates will tend to be more significant, so the actual repulsion due to other electron pairs in double or triple bonds becomes less critical. 2. In double or triple bonds, the additional electron pairs are part of the same bonding structure and are shared between the same two atoms, so they tend to be concentrated in the same region of space. This means that they effectively act as a single electron domain for the purposes of considering repulsions and molecular geometry determination. In summary, counting double or triple bonds as a single electron domain in the VSEPR model is justified because they have similar spatial constraints and repulsive force effects upon molecular geometry as a single bond does, despite having additional electron pairs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Starting with the orbital diagram of a sulfur atom, describe the steps needed to construct hybrid orbitals appropriate to describe the bonding in \(\mathrm{SF}_{2}\). (b) What is the name given to the hybrid orbitals constructed in (a)? (c) Sketch the large lobes of the hybrid orbitals constructed in part (a). (d) Would the hybridization scheme in part (a) be appropriate for \(\mathrm{SF}_{4} ?\) Explain.

(a) How does one determine the number of electron domains in a molecule or ion? (b) What is the difference between a bonding electron domain and a nonbonding electron domain?

Consider the bonding in an \(\mathrm{MgH}_{2}\) molecule. (a) Draw a Lewis structure for the molecule, and predict its molecular geometry. (b) What hybridization scheme is used in \(\mathrm{MgH}_{2} ?\) (c) Sketch one of the two-electron bonds between an \(\mathrm{Mg}\) hybrid orbital and an \(\mathrm{H} 1 \mathrm{~s}\) atomic orbital.

Give the electron-domain and molecular geometries of a molecule that has the following electron domains on its central atom: (a) four bonding domains and no nonbonding domains, (b) three bonding domains and two nonbonding domains, (c) five bonding domains and one nonbonding domain, (e) four bonding domains and two nonbonding domains.

(a) What is the probability of finding an electron on the internuclear axis if the electron occupies a \(\pi\) molecular orbital? (b) For a homonuclear diatomic molecule, what similarities and differences are there between the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MO made from the \(2 p_{x}\) atomic orbitals and the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MO made from the \(2 p_{y}\) atomic orbitals? (c) Why are the \(\pi_{2 p}\) MOs lower in energy than the \(\pi_{2 p}^{*}\) MOs?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.