/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 60 For a given metal ion and set of... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For a given metal ion and set of ligands, is the crystal-field splitting energy larger for a tetrahedral or an octahedral geometry?

Short Answer

Expert verified
In conclusion, for a given metal ion and set of ligands, the crystal-field splitting energy is larger for an octahedral geometry than for a tetrahedral geometry. This is because the ligand interactions are stronger in octahedral geometry due to the ligand-metal ion bond angles. The relationship between the crystal-field splitting energies in octahedral (Δ_oct) and tetrahedral (Δ_tet) geometries can be defined as: Δ_tet = \( \frac{4}{9} \) * Δ_oct The factor \( \frac{4}{9} \) indicates that the tetrahedral geometry has a smaller crystal-field splitting energy compared to the octahedral geometry.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Tetrahedral and Octahedral Geometries

Tetrahedral geometry consists of a metal ion surrounded by four ligands, while octahedral geometry consists of a metal ion surrounded by six ligands. In both cases, the ligands interact differently with the metal ion's d-orbitals, leading to different crystal-field splitting energies.
02

Crystal-Field Splitting in Octahedral Geometry

In octahedral geometry, the d-orbitals of the metal ion are split into two groups: the t₂g orbitals (d(xy), d(xz), and d(yz)) and the e_g orbitals (d(x²-y²) and d(z²)). The t₂g orbitals are lower in energy, while the e_g orbitals are higher in energy. The crystal-field splitting energy in octahedral geometry (Δ_oct) is the energy difference between the t₂g and e_g orbitals.
03

Crystal-Field Splitting in Tetrahedral Geometry

In tetrahedral geometry, the d-orbitals are also split into two groups, but this time the e (d(xy), d(xz), and d(yz)) orbitals are lower in energy, and the t₂ orbitals (d(x²-y²) and d(z²)) are higher in energy. The crystal-field splitting energy in tetrahedral geometry (Δ_tet) is the energy difference between the e and t₂ orbitals.
04

Comparing Crystal-Field Splitting Energies

In general, the crystal-field splitting energy in octahedral geometry is larger than that in tetrahedral geometry. This is because the ligand interactions are stronger in octahedral geometry due to the ligand-metal ion bond angles (90° for octahedral vs 109.5° for tetrahedral). To make a comparison, we can define a relationship between Δ_oct and Δ_tet: Δ_tet = 4/9 * Δ_oct The factor 4/9 indicates that the crystal-field splitting energy is smaller for tetrahedral geometry than for octahedral geometry.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, for a given metal ion and set of ligands, the crystal-field splitting energy is larger for an octahedral geometry than for a tetrahedral geometry.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following three complexes: (Complex 1) \(\left[\mathrm{Co}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{5} \mathrm{SCN}\right]^{2+}\) (Complex 2) \(\left[\mathrm{Co}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{3} \mathrm{Cl}_{3}\right]^{2+}\) (Complex 3) \(\mathrm{CoClBr} \cdot 5 \mathrm{NH}_{3}\) Which of the three complexes can have (a) geometric isomers, (b) linkage isomers, (c) optical isomers, (d) coordination-sphere isomers?

Which type of substance is attracted by a magnetic field, a diamagnetic substance or a paramagnetic substance?

Write the names of the following compounds, using the standard nomenclature rules for coordination complexes: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{Rh}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right] \mathrm{Cl}\) (b) \(\mathrm{K}_{2}\left[\mathrm{TiCl}_{6}\right]\) (c) \(\mathrm{MoOCI}_{4}\) (d) \(\left[\operatorname{Pt}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}\right)_{4}\left(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{4}\right)\right] \mathrm{Br}_{2}\)

Four-coordinate metals can have either a tetrahedral or a square-planar geometry; both possibilities are shown here for \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{2}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{2}\right] .\) (a) \(\mathrm{What}\) is the name of this molecule? (b) Would the tetrahedral molecule have a geometric isomer? (c) Would the tetrahedral molecule be diamagnetic or paramagnetic? (d) Would the square-planar molecule have a geometric isomer? (e) Would the square-planar molecule be diamagnetic or paramagnetic? (f) Would determining the number of geometric isomers help you distinguish between the tetrahedral and square-planar geometries? (g) Would measuring the molecule's response to a magnetic field help you distinguish between the two geometries? [Sections 23.4-23.6 ]

Which periodic trend is partially responsible for the observation that the maximum oxidation state of the transition-metal elements peaks near groups 7 \(\mathrm{B}\) and 8 \(\mathrm{B} ?\) (a) The number of valence electrons reaches a maximum at group 8 \(\mathrm{B} .\) (b) The effective nuclear charge increases on moving left across each period. (c) The radii of the transition-metal elements reach a minimum for group \(8 \mathrm{B},\) and as the size of the atoms decreases it becomes easier to remove electrons.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.