Chapter 7: Problem 87
As we move across a period of the periodic table, why do the sizes of the transition elements change more gradually than those of the representative elements?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 7: Problem 87
As we move across a period of the periodic table, why do the sizes of the transition elements change more gradually than those of the representative elements?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Consider the \(\mathrm{A}_{2} \mathrm{X}_{4}\) molecule depicted here, where \(\mathrm{A}\) and \(\mathrm{X}\) are elements. The \(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{A}\) bond length in this molecule is \(d_{1},\) and the four \(\mathrm{A}-\mathrm{X}\) bond lengths are each \(d_{2}\). (a) In terms of \(d_{1}\) and \(d_{2}\), how could you define the bonding atomic radii of atoms \(A\) and \(X ?(b)\) In terms of \(d_{1}\) and \(d_{2}\), what would you predict for the \(\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{X}\) bond length of an \(\mathrm{X}_{2}\) molecule? \([\) Section 7.3\(]\)
Although the electron affinity of bromine is a negative quantity, it is positive for \(\mathrm{Kr}\). Use the electron configurations of the two elements to explain the difference.
Detailed calculations show that the value of \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for the outermost electrons in \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\) atoms is \(4.29+\) and \(6.12+\), respectively. (a) What value do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) experienced by the outermost electron in both Si and Cl by assuming core electrons contribute 1.00 and valence electrons contribute 0.00 to the screening constant? (b) What values do you estimate for \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) using Slater's rules? (c) Which approach gives a more accurate estimate of \(Z_{\text {eff }} ?\) (d) Which method of approximation more accurately accounts for the steady increase in \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) that occurs upon moving left to right across a period? (e) Predict \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for a valence electron in P, phosphorus, based on the calculations for \(\mathrm{Si}\) and \(\mathrm{Cl}\).
Moseley established the concept of atomic number by studying X-rays emitted by the elements. The X-rays emitted by some of the elements have the following wavelengths: $$ \begin{array}{ll} \hline \text { Element } & \text { Wavelength }(\AA) \\\ \hline \mathrm{Ne} & 14.610 \\ \mathrm{Ca} & 3.358 \\ \mathrm{Zn} & 1.435 \\\ \mathrm{Zr} & 0.786 \\ \mathrm{Sn} & 0.491 \\ \hline \end{array} $$
Some ions do not have a corresponding neutral atom that has the same electron configuration. For each of the following ions, identify the neutral atom that has the same number of electrons and determine if this atom has the same electron configuration. If such an atom does not exist, explain why. (b) \(\mathrm{Sc}^{3+}\) (d) \(\mathrm{Zn}^{2+},(\mathrm{e}) \mathrm{Sn}^{4+}\) (a) \(\mathrm{Cl}\) (c) \(\mathrm{Fe}^{2+}\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.