/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 57 A classmate says, "A weak-field ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A classmate says, "A weak-field ligand usually means the complex is high spin." Is your classmate correct? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, your classmate is correct. A weak-field ligand results in a smaller crystal field splitting energy (Δ), which is more likely to lead to a high-spin complex. This is because when Δ is smaller than the pairing energy (P), electrons prefer to occupy higher-energy orbitals with parallel spins rather than pairing up in lower-energy orbitals.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Weak-Field Ligands and High-Spin Complexes

Weak-field ligands are ligands that do not produce a large crystal field splitting energy (Δ). They result in smaller differences between the energy levels of the d orbitals in a transition metal complex. This means that d electrons will not be strongly stabilized by the ligand, and the ligand has a weaker ability to create a field around the metal ion. On the other hand, high-spin complexes are those in which electrons prefer to occupy higher-energy orbitals with parallel spins, rather than pairing up in lower-energy orbitals. This occurs when the crystal field splitting energy (Δ) is smaller than the pairing energy (P), which is the energy required for an electron to pair up in a lower-energy orbital (Δ < P).
02

Examining the Correlation between Weak-Field Ligands and High-Spin Complexes

A weak-field ligand, as mentioned earlier, results in a smaller crystal field splitting energy (Δ). When the splitting energy is small, it is more likely that the complex will be high-spin because the electrons would prefer occupying the higher-energy orbitals with parallel spins rather than pairing up in the lower-energy orbitals. In other words, if the ligands are weak-field, the electrons will not be stabilized by their interaction with the ligands, so they will require less energy to move to the next energy level (as compared to moving to a higher orbit in a strong-field complex). Thus, it's more probable that the complex will be high-spin with weak-field ligands.
03

Conclusion

Based on this explanation, it can be said that the classmate's statement is indeed correct. A weak-field ligand usually means the complex will be high-spin, given that the crystal field splitting energy is smaller than the pairing energy, making it more favorable for electrons to occupy higher-energy orbitals with parallel spins.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Although the cis configuration is known for \(\left[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{en}) \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right], \mathrm{no}\) trans form is known. (a) Explain why the trans compound is not possible. (b) Would \(\mathrm{NH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{NH}_{2}\) be more likely than en \(\left(\mathrm{NH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{CH}_{2} \mathrm{NH}_{2}\right)\) to form the trans compound? Explain.

Consider an octahedral complex \(\mathrm{MA}_{3} \mathrm{~B}_{3} .\) How many geometric isomers are expected for this compound? Will any of the isomers be optically active? If so, which ones?

A Cu electrode is immersed in a solution that is \(1.00 \mathrm{M}\) in \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4}\right]^{2+}\) and \(1.00 \mathrm{M}\) in \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\). When the cathode is a standard hydrogen electrode, the emf of the cell is found to be \(+0.08 \mathrm{~V}\). What is the formation constant for \(\left[\mathrm{Cu}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4}\right]^{2+} ?\)

Generally speaking, for a given metal and ligand, the stability of a coordination compound is greater for the metal in the +3 rather than in the +2 oxidation state (for metals that form stable +3 ions in the first place). Suggest an explanation, keeping in mind the Lewis acid-base nature of the metal-ligand bond.

Suppose that a transition-metal ion was in a lattice in which it was in contact with just two nearby anions, located on opposite sides of the metal. Diagram the splitting of the metal \(\bar{d}\) orbitals that would result from such a crystal field. Assuming a strong field, how many unpaired electrons would you expect for a metal ion with six \(d\) electrons? (Hint: Consider the linear axis to be the \(z\) -axis)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.