/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 96 Which better explains the magnet... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Which better explains the magnetic properties of molecular substances: valence bond theory or molecular orbital theory?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Molecular orbital theory better explains the magnetic properties of molecular substances compared to valence bond theory.

Step by step solution

01

Valence Bond Theory

Valence bond theory is based on the idea that atoms within a molecule are bonded together through the overlap of their atomic orbitals, resulting in the formation of sigma (σ) and pi (π) bonds. The strength of the bond is determined by the extent of overlap between orbitals. However, valence bond theory does not provide a direct insight into the explanation of the magnetic properties of molecular substances since it doesn't consider the combination of atomic orbitals to form new molecular orbitals.
02

Molecular Orbital Theory

Molecular orbital theory is an advanced approach that combines the atomic orbitals of individual atoms to form new molecular orbitals. These new orbitals can be bonding, non-bonding, or anti-bonding orbitals. Molecular orbital theory takes into account both occupied and unoccupied orbitals, which allows it to better explain the magnetic properties of molecular substances. The presence of unpaired electrons in molecular orbitals gives rise to magnetic behavior, as these unpaired electrons are influenced by external magnetic fields.
03

Comparison and Conclusion

While both valence bond theory and molecular orbital theory help describe chemical bonding, molecular orbital theory provides a more complete explanation of the magnetic properties of molecular substances. This is because molecular orbital theory directly considers the presence of unpaired electrons in molecular orbitals, which are responsible for the magnetic behavior of substances. Therefore, molecular orbital theory better explains the magnetic properties of molecular substances compared to valence bond theory.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Valence Bond Theory
Understanding chemical bonding is key to grasping how molecules function and interact. The Valence Bond Theory (VBT) provides one perspective on how bonds are formed. It focuses on the overlap between atomic orbitals of the bonding atoms.
  • Sigma (σ) and pi (Ï€) bonds are formed when atomic orbitals overlap.
  • The effectiveness of these bonds depends on the extent of this overlap.
While VBT offers insights into bond formation, it doesn't extend to explaining magnetic properties. This is because it mainly describes how atoms within a molecule are held together, without detailing how these atoms might respond to magnetic fields. The theory primarily considers localized electrons, which makes it inadequate in addressing why some molecular substances are magnetic. Instead, it is more focused on defining the bond types and strengths within a molecule.
Magnetic Properties
Molecular substances can exhibit magnetic properties due to the presence of unpaired electrons. These unpaired electrons create a magnetic dipole moment, making the molecule responsive to external magnetic fields.
  • Substances with all paired electrons are diamagnetic, meaning they are slightly repelled by magnetic fields.
  • Conversely, molecules with one or more unpaired electrons are paramagnetic, which causes them to be attracted to magnetic fields.
Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT) is particularly useful in explaining these properties. The theory examines the arrangement of electrons in molecular orbitals, which results from the combination of atomic orbitals. By understanding how electrons populate these molecular orbitals, we can predict whether the substance will exhibit diamagnetism or paramagnetism. The presence of unpaired electrons in molecular orbitals directly influences the magnetic behavior of a substance, which VBT alone cannot clearly define.
Molecular Substances
Molecular substances encompass a wide range of chemical compounds known for their distinct electronic structures. These structures are best explained using Molecular Orbital Theory. By considering molecular substances, we delve into the intricacies of how atoms bond and how these bonds contribute to the properties of the molecule.
  • MOT considers both the bonding and antibonding orbitals, providing a full spectrum analysis of molecular stability and properties.
  • The presence or absence of unpaired electrons in these molecular orbitals determines the molecule's magnetic properties.
Unlike Valence Bond Theory, which focuses on localized orbitals between specific atoms, Molecular Orbital Theory offers a more comprehensive view. It takes into account the entire structure, allowing for better predictions about the molecular behavior under different conditions, including magnetic influences. Thus, for a complete understanding of molecular substances and their magnetic characteristics, MOT proves to be indispensable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What must atomic orbitals have in common to mix together and form hybrid orbitals?

Health Perchlorate compounds adversely affect human health by interfering with the uptake of iodine in the thyroid gland. Because of that behavior, though, they are also used to treat hyperthyroidism, or overactive thyroid. Draw the Lewis structure(s) of the perchlorate ion, \(\mathrm{ClO}_{4}^{-}\), including all resonance forms, in which formal charges are closest to zero. What is the shape of the ion? Suggest a hybridization scheme for the central chlorine atom that accounts for this shape.

Draw a Lewis structure for \(\mathrm{Cl}_{3}^{+}\). Determine its molecular geometry and the hybridization of the central Cl atom.

Toxic to Insects and People Methyl thiocyanate (CH \(_{3} \mathrm{SCN}\) ) is used as an agricultural pesticide and fumigant. It is slightly water soluble and is readily absorbed through the skin, but it is highly toxic if ingested. Its toxicity stems in part from its metabolism to cyanide ion. a. Draw the Lewis structure for methyl thiocyanate, including all resonance forms. b. Assign formal charges and predict which structure contributes the most to bonding. c. Predict the molecular geometry of the molecule at both carbon atoms.

Determine the molecular geometries of the following ions: (a) \(\mathrm{SCN}^{-} ;\) (b) \(\mathrm{CH}_{3} \mathrm{PCl}_{3}^{+}(\mathrm{P}\) is the central atom and is bonded to the \(\mathrm{C}\) atom of the methyl group); (c) \(\mathrm{ICl}_{2}^{-}\) (d) \(\mathrm{PO}_{3}^{3-}.\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.