/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 19Q Fuhremann Co. is a full-service ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Fuhremann Co. is a full-service manufacturer of surveillance equipment. Customers can purchase any combination of equipment, installation services, and training as part of Fuhremann’s security services. Thus, each of these performance obligations is separate from individual standalone selling prices. Laplante Inc. purchased cameras, installation, and training at a total price of \(80,000. Estimated standalone selling prices of the equipment, installation, and training are \)90,000, \(7,000, and \)3,000, respectively. How should the transaction price be allocated to the equipment, installation, and training?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Transaction price allocated to:

Equipment - $72,000

Installation - $5,600

Training - $2,400

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of Transaction Price

The term transaction price is referred to the process of deciding the amount to be received by a seller from its customers for the promised product or service. The transaction price may be fixed or change depending on the transaction's time or performance.

02

Transaction price allocated to equipment, installation, training

Equipment, installation, and training are three different performance duties since each part sells individually and has a separate standalone selling price.

Based on their respective standalone selling prices, the total income of $80,000 should be divided among the three performance commitments. As a result, the anticipated total selling price is $100,000. Hence, the distribution is as follows:

Working Notes:

The selling price of equipment = $90,000

The selling price of installation = $7,000

The selling price of training = $3,000

Total price at which Laplante Inc. purchased cameras, installation, training = $80,000

Totalsellingprice=Sellingpriceofequipment+Sellingpriceofinstallation+Sellingpriceoftraining=$90,000+$7,000+$3,000=$100,000

Calculation of transaction price allocated to equipment is as follows:

Transactionpriceallocatedtoequipment=SellingpriceofequipmentTotalsellingprice×Totalpurchaseprice=$90,000$100,000×$80,000=$72,000

Calculation of transaction price allocated to installation is as follows:

Transactionpriceallocatedtoinstallation=SellingpriceofinstallationTotalsellingprice×Totalpurchasedprice=$7,000$100,000×$80,000=$5,600

Calculation of transaction price allocated to training is as follows:

Transactionpriceallocatedtotraining=SellingpriceoftrainingTotalsellingprice×Totalpurchasedprice=$3,000$100,000×$80,000=$2,400

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Allocate Transaction Price) Crankshaft Company manufactures equipment. Crankshaft’s products range from simple automated machinery to complex systems containing numerous components. Unit selling prices range from \(200,000 to \)1,500,000 and are quoted inclusive of installation. The installation process does not involve changes to the features of the equipment and does not require proprietary information about the equipment in order for the installed equipment to perform to specifications. Crankshaft has the following arrangement with Winkerbean Inc.

• Winkerbean purchases equipment from Crankshaft for a price of \(1,000,000 and contracts with Crankshaft to install the equipment. Crankshaft charges the same price for the equipment irrespective of whether it does the installation or not. Using market data, Crankshaft determines installation service is estimated to have a standalone selling price of \)50,000. The cost of the equipment is \(600,000.

• Winkerbean is obligated to pay Crankshaft the \)1,000,000 upon the delivery and installation of the equipment.

Crankshaft delivers the equipment on June 1, 2017, and completes the installation of the equipment on September 30, 2017. The equipment has a useful life of 10 years. Assume that the equipment and the installation are two distinct performance obligations which should be accounted for separately.

Instructions

(a) How should the transaction price of $1,000,000 be allocated among the service obligations?

(b) Prepare the journal entries for Crankshaft for this revenue arrangement on June 1, 2017 and September 30, 2017, assuming Crankshaft receives payment when installation is completed.

Kristin Company sells 300 units of its products for \(20 each to Logan Inc. for cash. Kristin allows Logan to return any unused product within 30 days and receive a full refund. The cost of each product is \)12. To determine the transaction price, Kristin decides that the approach that is most predictive of the amount of consideration to which it will be entitled is the probability-weighted amount. Using the probability-weighted amount, Kristin estimates that (1) 10 products will be returned and (2) the returned products are expected to be resold at a profit. Indicate the amount of (a) net sales, (b) estimated liability for refunds, and (c) cost of goods sold that Kristen should report in its financial statements (assume that none of the products have been returned at the financial statement date).

How do companies recognize revenue from a performance obligation over time?

On May 10, 2017, Cosmo Co. enters into a contract to deliver a product to Greig Inc. on June 15, 2017. Greig agrees to pay the full contract price of \(2,000 on July 15, 2017. The cost of the goods is \)1,300. Cosmo delivers the product to Greig on June 15, 2017, and receives payment on July 15, 2017. Prepare the journal entries for Cosmo related to this contract. Either party may terminate the contract without compensation until one of the parties performs

Leno Computers manufactures tablet computers for sale to retailers such as Fallon Electronics. Recently, Leno sold and delivered 200 tablet computers to Fallon for $20,000 on January 5, 2017. Fallon has agreed to pay for the 200 tablet computers within 30 days. Fallon has a good credit rating and should have no difficulty in making payment to Leno. (a) Explain whether a valid contract exists between Leno Computers and Fallon Electronics. (b) Assuming that Leno Computers has not yet delivered the tablet computers to Fallon Electronics, what might cause a valid contract not to exist between Leno and Fallon?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.