/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Question 1BE Presented below is information r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Presented below is information related to Rembrandt Inc.’s inventory. (per unit) Skis Boots Parkas Historical cost \(190.00 \)106.00 $53.00 Selling price 212.00 145.00 73.75 Cost to sell 19.00 8.00 2.50 Cost to complete 32.00 29.00 21.25 Determine the following: (a) the net realizable value for each item, and (b) the carrying value of each item under LCN

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Net realizable value per unit for Skis, Boots, and Parkas equals $161, $108, and $50, respectively.

(b) Carrying value per unit for Skis, Boots, and Parkas equals $161, $106, and $50, respectively.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate net realizable value for each item

(a) Net realizable value for each item is calculated as follows:

Skis

Boots

Parkas

Selling price

$212

$145

$73.75

Less: Cost to sell

19

8

2.50

Less: Cost to complete

32

29

21.25

Net Realizable Value

$161

$108

$50

02

Calculate carrying value of each item using LCNRV

(b) Carrying value of each item using LCNRV is calculated as follows:

Skis

Boots

Parkas

Historical Cost

$190

$106

$53

Net Realizable Value

161

108

50

Carrying Value as per LCNRV

$161

$106

$50

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Davenport Department Store converted from the conventional retail method to the LIFO retail method on January 1, 2017, and is now considering converting to the dollar-value LIFO inventory method. During your examination of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, management requested that you furnish a summary showing certain computations of inventory cost for the past 3 years. Here is the available information. 1. The inventory at January 1, 2016, had a retail value of \(56,000 and cost of \)29,800 based on the conventional retail method. 2. Transactions during 2016 were as follows. Cost Retail Purchases \(311,000 \)554,000 Purchase returns 5,200 10,000 Purchase discounts 6,000 Gross sales revenue (after employee discounts) 551,000 Sales returns 9,000 Employee discounts 3,000 Freight-in 17,600 Net markups 20,000 Net markdowns 12,000 3. The retail value of the December 31, 2017, inventory was \(75,600, the cost ratio for 2017 under the LIFO retail method was 61%, and the regional price index was 105% of the January 1, 2017, price level. 4. The retail value of the December 31, 2018, inventory was \)62,640, the cost ratio for 2018 under the LIFO retail method was 60%, and the regional price index was 108% of the January 1, 2017, price level. Instructions (a) Prepare a schedule showing the computation of the cost of inventory on hand at December 31, 2016, based on the conventional retail method. (b) Prepare a schedule showing the recomputation of the inventory to be reported on December 31, 2016, in accordance with procedures necessary to convert from the conventional retail method to the LIFO retail method beginning January 1, 2017. Assume that the retail value of the December 31, 2016, inventory was \(60,000. (c) Without prejudice to your solution to part (b), assume that you computed the December 31, 2016, inventory (retail value \)60,000) under the LIFO retail method at a cost of $33,300. Prepare a schedule showing the computations of the cost of the store’s 2017 and 2018 year-end inventories under the dollar-value LIFO method.

Question:Why are inventories valued at the lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value (LCNRV)? What are the arguments against the use of the LCNRV method of valuing inventories?

Under IFRS, agricultural activity results in which of the following types of assets? I. Agricultural produce II. Biological assets (a) I only. (b) II only. (c) I and II. (d) Neither I nor II.

John Olerud Ltd., a local retailing concern in the Bronx, New York, has decided to change from the conventional retail inventory method to the LIFO retail method starting on January 1, 2018. The company recomputed its ending inventory for 2017 in accordance with the procedures necessary to switch to LIFO retail. The inventory computed was \(212,600. Instructions Assuming that John Olerud Ltd.’s ending inventory for 2017 under the conventional retail inventory method was \)205,000, prepare the appropriate journal entry on January 1, 2018.

Tim Legler requires an estimate of the cost of goods lost by fire on March 9. Merchandise on hand on January 1 was \(38,000. Purchases since January 1 were \)72,000; freight-in, \(3,400; purchase returns and allowances, \)2,400. Sales are made at 331 /3% above cost and totaled \(100,000 to March 9. Goods costing \)10,900 were left undamaged by the fire; remaining goods were destroyed. Instructions (a) Compute the cost of goods destroyed. (b) Compute the cost of goods destroyed, assuming that the gross profit is 331 /3% of sales.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.