/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q7P. On April 15, 2018, fire damaged ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

On April 15, 2018, fire damaged the office and warehouse of Stanislaw Corporation. The only accounting record saved was the general ledger, from which the balance sheet data below was prepared. STANISLAW CORPORATION MARCH 31, 2018 Dr. Cr. Cash \( 20,000 Accounts receivable 40,000 Inventory, December 31, 2017 75,000 Land 35,000 Buildings 110,000 Accumulated depreciation \) 41,300 Equipment 3,600 Accounts payable 23,700 Other accrued expenses 10,200 Common stock 100,000 Retained earnings 52,000 Sales revenue 135,000 Purchases 52,000 Miscellaneous expense 26,600 . \(362,200 \)362,200The following data and information have been gathered. 1. The fiscal year of the corporation ends on December 31. 2. An examination of the April bank statement and canceled checks revealed that checks written during the period April 1–15 totaled \(13,000: \)5,700 paid to accounts payable as of March 31, \(3,400 for April merchandise shipments, and \)3,900 paid for other expenses. Deposits during the same period amounted to \(12,950, which consisted of receipts on account from customers with the exception of a \)950 refund from a vendor for merchandise returned in April. 3. Correspondence with suppliers revealed unrecorded obligations at April 15 of \(15,600 for April merchandise shipments, including \)2,300 for shipments in transit (f.o.b. shipping point) on that date. 4. Customers acknowledged indebtedness of \(46,000 at April 15, 2018. It was also estimated that customers owed another \)8,000 that will never be acknowledged or recovered. Of the acknowledged indebtedness, \(600 will probably be uncollectible. 5. The companies insuring the inventory agreed that the corporation’s fire-loss claim should be based on the assumption that the overall gross profit rate for the past 2 years was in effect during the current year. The corporation’s audited financial statements disclosed this information: Year Ended December 31 2017 2016 Net sales \)530,000 \(390,000 Net purchases 280,000 235,000 Beginning inventory 50,000 66,000 Ending inventory 75,000 50,000 6. Inventory with a cost of \)7,000 was salvaged and sold for $3,500. The balance of the inventory was a total loss. Instructions Prepare a schedule computing the amount of inventory fire loss. The supporting schedule of the computation of the gross profit should be in good form.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Inventory by fire loss is $50,700.

Step by step solution

01

Calculation of gross profit percentage

The gross profit percentage is calculated as follows:

Net sales 2016

$390,000

Net sales 2017

530,000

Total net sales

$920,000

Beginning inventory

$66,000

Net purchases 2016

235,000

Net purchases 2017

280,000

Cost of goods available

$581,000

Less: Ending inventory 2017

75,000

$506,000

Gross Profit

$414,000

Gross profit percentage ($414,000 / $920,000)

45%

02

Calculation of fire loss on inventory

The fire loss amount is calculated as follows:

Computation of Inventory Fire Loss

Inventory

$75,000

Purchases

52,000

April merchandise

3.400

Unrecorded purchases

15,600

Less: Shipment in transit

$2,300

$146,000

Goods returned

950

3,250

Cost of goods available for sale

$142,750

Less: Cost of sales estimated

Sales

135,000

Receivables acknowledged

$46,000

Receivables not acknowledged

8,000

Total

$54,000

Add: Collections ($12,950-$950)

12,000

Total

$66,000

Less: Receivables

40,000

26,000

Total Sales

$161,000

Less: Gross profit (45% x $161,000)

72,450

88,450

Estimated merchandise inventory

$54,200

Less: Salvage value

3,500

Inventory by fire loss

$50,700

Thus, inventory by fire loss is $50,700.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Malone Company determined its ending inventory at cost and at LCNRV at December 31, 2017, December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2019, as shown below. Cost NRV 12/31/17 \(650,000 \)650,000 12/31/18 780,000 712,000 12/31/19 905,000 830,000 Instructions (a) Prepare the journal entries required at December 31, 2018, and at December 31, 2019, assuming that a perpetual inventory system and the cost-of-goods-sold method of adjusting to LCNRV is used. (b) Prepare the journal entries required at December 31, 2018, and at December 31, 2019, assuming that a perpetual inventory is recorded at cost and reduced to LCNRV using the loss method.

LaTour Inc. is based in France and prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS. In 2017, it reported cost of goods sold of \(578 million and average inventory of \)154 million. Briefly discuss how analysis of LaTour’s inventory turnover (and comparisons to a company using GAAP) might be affected by differences in inventory accounting between IFRS and GAAP.

Question:The conventional retail inventory method yields results that are essentially the same as those yielded by the lower-of-cost-or-market method. Explain. Prepare an illustration of how the retail inventory method reduces inventory to market.

Presented below is information related to Langston Hughes Corporation. Price LIFO Index Cost Retail Inventory on December 31, 2017, when dollar-value LIFO is adopted 100 \(36,000 \) 74,500 Inventory, December 31, 2018 110 ? 100,100 Instructions Compute the ending inventory under the dollar-value LIFO method at December 31, 2018. The cost-to-retail ratio for 2018 was 60%.

Presented below is information related to Rembrandt Inc.’s inventory, assuming Rembrandt uses lower-of-LIFO cost-or-market. (per unit) Skis Boots Parkas Historical cost \(190.00 \)106.00 $53.00 Selling price 212.00 145.00 73.75 Cost to distribute 19.00 8.00 2.50 Current replacement cost 203.00 105.00 51.00 Normal profit margin 32.00 29.00 21.25 Determine the following: (a) the two limits to market value (i.e., the ceiling and the floor) that should be used in the lower-of cost-or-market computation for skis, (b) the cost amount that should be used in the lower-of-cost-or-market comparison of boots, and (c) the market amount that should be used to value parkas on the basis of the lower-of-cost-or-market.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.