Chapter 3: Problem 5
Discuss how Mendel's monohybrid results served as the basis for all but one of his postulates. Which postulate was not based on these results? Why?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 3: Problem 5
Discuss how Mendel's monohybrid results served as the basis for all but one of his postulates. Which postulate was not based on these results? Why?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Two true-breeding pea plants were crossed. One parent is round, terminal, violet, constricted, while the other expresses the respective contrasting phenotypes of wrinkled, axial, white, full. The four pairs of contrasting traits are controlled by four genes, each located on a separate chromosome. In the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) only round, axial, violet, and full were expressed. In the \(\mathrm{F}_{2},\) all possible combinations of these traits were expressed in ratios consistent with Mendelian inheritance. (a) What conclusion about the inheritance of the traits can be drawn based on the \(\mathrm{F}_{1}\) results? (b) In the \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) results, which phenotype appeared most frequently? Write a mathematical expression that predicts the probability of occurrence of this phenotype. (c) Which \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) phenotype is expected to occur least frequently? Write a mathematical expression that predicts this probability. (d) In the \(F_{2}\) generation, how often is either of the \(P_{1}\) phenotypes likely to occur? (e) If the \(F_{1}\) plants were testcrossed, how many different phenotypes would be produced? How does this number compare with the number of different phenotypes in the \(\mathrm{F}_{2}\) generation just discussed?
The basis for rejecting any null hypothesis is arbitrary. The researcher can set more or less stringent standards by deciding to raise or lower the \(p\) value used to reject or not reject the hypothesis. In the case of the chi- square analysis of genetic crosses, would the use of a standard of \(p=0.10\) be more or less stringent about not rejecting the null hypothesis? Explain.
Draw all possible conclusions concerning the mode of inheritance of the trait portrayed in each of the following limited pedigrees. (Each of the four cases is based on a different trait.) a. b. c. d.
In a family of eight children, what is the probability that (a) the third child is a girl? (b) six of the children are boys? (c) all the children are girls? (d) there are four boys and four girls? Assume that the probability of having a boy is equal to the probability of having a girl \((p=1 / 2)\).
What is the basis for homology among chromosomes?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.