/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Intron frequency varies consider... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Intron frequency varies considerably among eukaryotes. Provide a general comparison of intron frequencies in yeast and humans. What about intron size?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Yeast has a lower intron frequency and smaller introns, with only about 4% of its genes containing introns and an average intron size of around 250 base pairs. In contrast, humans have a higher intron frequency and larger introns, with approximately 90% of protein-coding genes containing introns and an average intron size of about 3,300 base pairs.

Step by step solution

01

Define introns and their role in eukaryotes

Introns are non-coding sequences of DNA that are present within genes in eukaryotic organisms. They are transcribed into pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) molecules during transcription. However, introns do not contribute to the final protein products because they are removed from the pre-mRNA during the process of RNA splicing. The remaining sequences, called exons, are joined together to form the mature mRNA molecule, which is then used as a template for protein synthesis.
02

Compare intron frequencies in yeast and humans

Yeast and humans have different intron frequencies. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), being a simple single-celled eukaryote, has a relatively low intron frequency. Only about 4% of its genes contain introns, and most of these genes possess only a single intron. On the other hand, humans, as complex multicellular eukaryotes, have a much higher intron frequency. Approximately 90% of human protein-coding genes contain introns, and these genes often possess multiple introns. It has been estimated that the human genome contains around 190,000 introns.
03

Compare intron sizes in yeast and humans

There are significant differences in intron sizes between yeast and humans. In yeast, introns are relatively small, with an average size of around 250 base pairs (bp). In humans, introns vary in size and can range from less than 100 bp to hundreds of thousands of bp. The average intron size in the human genome is significantly larger than that in yeast, with some sources estimating it to be around 3,300 bp. The larger intron sizes in humans contribute to the overall larger size of the human genome compared to the yeast genome. In conclusion, intron frequencies and sizes differ considerably between yeast and humans, with yeast having a lower intron frequency and smaller introns, while humans have a higher intron frequency and larger introns. These differences reflect the varying degrees of complexity of the organisms and their genome organization.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Archaea (formerly known as archaebacteria) is one of the three major divisions of living organisms; the other two are eubacteria and eukaryotes. Nanoarchaeum equitans is in the Archaea domain and has one of the smallest genomes known, about 0.5 Mb. How can an organism complete its life cycle with so little genetic material?

Comparisons between human and chimpanzee genomes indicate that a gene that may function as a wild type or normal gene in one primate may function as a disease-causing gene in another (The Chimpanzee Sequence and Analysis Consortium, Nature, \(437: 69-87,2005\) ). For instance, the \(P P A R G\) locus (regulator of adipocyte differentiation) is associated with type 2 diabetes in humans but functions as a wild-type gene in chimps. What factors might cause this apparent contradiction? Would you consider such apparent contradictions to be rare or common? What impact might such findings have on the use of comparative genomics to identify and design therapies for disease-causing genes in humans?

In this chapter, we focused on the analysis of genomes, transcriptomes, and proteomes and considered important applications and findings from these endeavors. At the same time, we found many opportunities to consider the methods and reasoning by which much of this information was acquired. From the explanations given in the chapter, what answers would you propose to the following fundamental questions: (a) How do we know which contigs are part of the same chromosome? (b) How do we know if a genomic DNA sequence contains a protein-coding gene? (c) What evidence supports the concept that humans share substantial sequence similarities and gene functional similarities with model organisms? (d) How can proteomics identify differences between the number of protein- coding genes predicted for a genome and the number of proteins expressed by a genome? (e) What evidence indicates that gene families result from gene duplication events? (f) How have microarrays demonstrated that, although all cells of an organism have the same genome, some genes are expressed in almost all cells, whereas other genes show celland tissue-specific expression?

Annotations of the human genome have shown that genes are not randomly distributed, but form clusters with gene "deserts" in between. These "deserts" correspond to the dark bands on G-banded chromosomes. Comparisons between the human transcriptome map and the genome sequence show that highly expressed genes are also clustered together. In terms of genome organization, how is this an advantage?

Review the Chapter Concepts list on page \(556 .\) All of these pertain to how genomics, bioinformatics, and proteomics approaches have changed how scientists study genes and proteins. Write a short essay that explains how recombinant DNA techniques were used to identify and study genes compared to how modern genomic techniques have revolutionized the cloning and analysis of genes.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.