/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 56 You do not know whether a drug h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

You do not know whether a drug has zeroth order or first order elimination kinetics. You will use data to determine which type of kinetics it has. You measure the concentration of the drug (in \(\mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{ml}\) ) at time \(t=0\) and at time \(t=1 .\) No drug is added to the blood between \(t=0\) and \(t=1\). You measure the following data: \begin{tabular}{ll} \hline \(\boldsymbol{t}\) & \(\boldsymbol{c}_{t}\) \\ \hline 0 & 40 \\ 1 & 32 \\ \hline \end{tabular} (a) Assume that the drug has zeroth order kinetics. What amount is eliminated from the blood each hour? (b) Assume that the drug has zeroth order kinetics and no more drug is added to the blood. Write a recursion relation for \(c_{t}\) and predict \(c_{2}\). (c) Now assume the drug has first order elimination kinetics. What percentage of drug is eliminated from the blood each hour? (d) Assume that the drug has first order kinetics and no more drug is added. Write a recursion relation for \(c_{t}\) and predict \(c_{2}\). (e) You measure the concentration at time \(t=2\) and find \(c_{2}=\) 25.6. By comparing with your predictions from (b) and (d), decide: Does the drug have zeroth or first order kinetics?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The drug exhibits first order kinetics, as the predictions match the measured data.

Step by step solution

01

Zeroth Order Kinetics Elimination Rate

For zeroth order kinetics, the rate of elimination is constant over time. Given the concentrations at \(t=0\) and \(t=1\), we calculate this constant rate.The concentration decreases from 40 to 32 \(\text{mg/ml}\) in one hour. Thus, the rate of elimination is \(40 - 32 = 8 \text{ mg/ml/hr}\).
02

Zeroth Order Recursion Relation and Prediction

For zeroth order kinetics, the concentration at time \(t+1\) is expressed as \(c_{t+1} = c_t - k\), where \(k\) is the rate of elimination.Given \(c_t = 32\) and \(k = 8\), for \(t=2\) we predict: \[ c_2 = c_1 - 8 = 32 - 8 = 24 \text{ mg/ml} \].
03

First Order Kinetics Elimination Percentage

First order kinetics involve a constant proportion of drug elimination per hour.The fractional change in concentration from \(t=0\) to \(t=1\) is:\[ \frac{c_1}{c_0} = \frac{32}{40} = 0.8 \].This implies \(20\%\) of the drug is eliminated per hour, as \(1 - 0.8 = 0.2\).
04

First Order Recursion Relation and Prediction

For first order kinetics, the recursion relation is \(c_{t+1} = c_t \times (1-r)\), where \(r\) is the percentage eliminated per hour (in decimal).With \(r = 0.2\), for \(t=2\) we have:\[ c_2 = c_1 \times 0.8 = 32 \times 0.8 = 25.6 \text{ mg/ml} \].
05

Comparing Predictions with Measured Data

Measured concentration at \(t=2\) is \( 25.6 \text{ mg/ml} \).- Zeroth order prediction was \(24 \text{ mg/ml}\).- First order prediction was \(25.6 \text{ mg/ml}\).Since the measured value of \(c_2\) matches exactly with the first order prediction, the drug follows first order kinetics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Zeroth order kinetics
Zeroth order kinetics in pharmacology implies that a drug is eliminated from the bloodstream at a consistent and constant rate, irrespective of its concentration. This means the amount of drug removed per unit time remains unchanged, and does not depend on how much drug is present at the time of measurement.
In practical terms, if you start with a drug concentration of 40 mg/ml and one hour later it reduces to 32 mg/ml, it indicates 8 mg/ml has been consistently eliminated in that timeframe. This rate of 8 mg/ml per hour will continue as long as the drug elimination follows zeroth order kinetics.
By recognizing zeroth order kinetics, we can predict future concentrations. For instance, given an elimination rate of 8 mg/ml, if the concentration at one hour is 32 mg/ml, the concentration at two hours will expectedly be 24 mg/ml. The equation to model this is straightforward: \( c_{t+1} = c_t - k \), where \( k \) is the rate of elimination, being 8 mg/ml/hr in this example.
First order kinetics
First order kinetics is a different ball game compared to zeroth order kinetics. Here, the drug is eliminated at a rate proportional to its current concentration. Instead of a constant amount, a constant *percentage* of the remaining drug is cleared per hour.
To illustrate, if your initial drug concentration is 40 mg/ml, and it drops to 32 mg/ml after one hour, this removal represents a fractional reduction. In percentage terms, this change is calculated as: \( \frac{32}{40} = 0.8 \) or 80% of the drug remains, thus indicating a 20% removal per hour.
When predicted using first order kinetics, if 20% of the drug is eliminated each hour, the recursion model will be \( c_{t+1} = c_t \times (1 - r) \), where \( r \) is the fractional removal rate (0.2 in this case). Applying this model at a concentration of 32 mg/ml gives: \( 32 \times 0.8 = 25.6 \) mg/ml. This matches measured data, confirming first order kinetics.
Drug concentration measurement
Understanding and accurately measuring drug concentration is crucial for determining the kinetic order of drug elimination. The concentration at different times allows us to discern the pattern of drug clearance from the body.
In the given study, concentrations at \( t=0 \) and \( t=1 \) were first recorded to observe changes in drug levels: going from 40 mg/ml to 32 mg/ml. This measurement is pivotal, offering a basis to assess if consistent amounts or proportions are being eliminated.
Moreover, further measurement, such as at \( t=2 \), aids in validating hypotheses about first or zeroth order kinetics. Like seeing if the result aligns with a predicted model whether it’s \( c_2 = 24 \) mg/ml for zeroth order or \( c_2 = 25.6 \) mg/ml for first order. When lab values coincide with a particular model, it asserts that model's applicability for the specific drug under study.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Model painkillers that are absorbed into the blood from a slow release pill. Ourmathematical model for the amount, \(a_{t}\), of drug in the blood t hours after the pill is taken must include the amount absorbed from the pill each hour. Our model starts with the word equation. $$ \begin{array}{c} a_{t+1}=a_{t}+\begin{array}{l} \text { amount absorbed } \\ \text { from the pill } \end{array}-\begin{array}{l} \text { amount eliminated } \\ \text { from the blood } \end{array} \end{array} $$ Assume the amount absorbed from the pill between time \(t\) and time \(t+1\) is \(20 \cdot(0.2)^{t}\). (a) The drug has first order elimination kinetics. \(40 \%\) of the drug is eliminated from the blood each hour. Write down the recursion relation for \(a_{t+1}\) in terms of \(a_{t}\) (b) Assuming that \(a_{0}=0\), meaning that no drug is present in the blood initially, calculate the amount of drug present at times \(t=1,2, \ldots, 6\) (c) What is the maximum amount of drug present at any time in this interval? At what time is this maximum amount reached? (d) Use a spreadsheet to calculate the amount of drug present in hourly intervals from \(t=0\) up to \(t=24\). (e) Show that, when \(t\) is large, the amount of drug present in the blood decreases approximately exponentially with \(t .\) Hint: Plot the values that you computed for \(a_{t}\) against \(t\) on semilogarithmic axes.

Investigate the behavior of the discrete logistic equation $$ x_{t+1}=R_{0} x_{t}\left(1-x_{t}\right) $$ Compute \(x_{t}\) for \(t=0,1,2, \ldots, 20\) for the given values of \(r\) and \(x_{0}\), and graph \(x_{t}\) as a function of \(t .\) \(R_{0}=3.1, x_{0}=0.1\)

A drug has zeroth order elimination kinetics. At time \(t=0\) an amount \(a_{0}=20 \mathrm{mg}\) is present in the blood. One hour later, at \(t=1\), an amount \(a_{1}=14 \mathrm{mg}\) is present. (a) Assuming that no drug is added to the blood between \(t=0\) and \(t=1\), calculate the amount of drug that is removed from the blood each hour. (b) Write a recursion relation for the amount of drug \(a_{t}\) that is present at time \(t\). Assume no extra drug is added to the blood. (c) Find an explicit formula for \(a_{t}\) as a function of \(t\). (d) When does the amount of drug present in the blood first drop \(\operatorname{to} 0 ?\)

\(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n}=a\). Find the limit \(a\), and determine \(N\) so that \(\left|a_{n}-a\right|<\epsilon\) for all \(n>N\) for the given value of \(\epsilon\) $$ a_{n}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}, \epsilon=0.05 $$

Tylenol in the Body A patient is taking Tylenol (a painkiller that contains acetaminophen) to treat a fever. The data in this question is taken from Rawlins, Henderson, and Hijab (1977). At \(t=0\) the patient takes their first pill. One hour later the drug has been completely absorbed and the blood concentration, measured in \(\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{ml}\), is 15 . Acetaminophen has first order elimination kinetics; in one hour, \(23 \%\) of the acetaminophen present in the blood is eliminated. (a) Write a recursion relation for the concentration \(c_{t}\) of drug in the patient's blood. For \(t \geq 1\) you may assume for now that no other pills are taken after the first one. (b) Find an explicit formula for \(c_{t}\) as a function of \(t\). (c) Suppose that the patient follows the directions on the pill box and takes another Tylenol pill 4 hours after the first (at time \(t=4\) ). What is the concentration at the time at which the second pill is taken? In others words, what is \(c_{4}\) ? (d) Over the next hour \(15 \mathrm{\mug} / \mathrm{ml}\) of drug enter the patient's bloodstream. So, \(c_{5}\) can be calculated from \(c_{4}\) using the word equation: $$ c_{5}=c_{4}+ $$ nt added \(\quad\) amount eliminated blo Given that the amount added is \(15 \mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{ml}\), and the amount eliminated is \(0.23 \cdot c_{4}\), calculate \(c_{5} .\) (e) For \(t=5,6,7,8\) the drug continues to be eliminated at a rate of \(23 \%\) per hour. No pills are taken and no extra drug enters the patient's blood. Compute \(c_{8}\). (f) At time \(t=8\), the patient takes another pill. Calculate \(c_{9} .\) Do not forget to include elimination of drug between \(t=8\) and \(t=9\). (g) We want to calculate the maximum concentration of drug in the patient's blood. We know that concentrations are highest in the hour after a pill is taken, namely at time \(t=1, t=5, t=\) \(9, \ldots\) Define a sequence \(C_{n}\) representing the concentration of the drug one hour after the \(n\) th pill is taken. (h) What terms of the original sequence \(\left\\{c_{r}: t=1,2, \ldots\right\\}\) are \(C_{1}\), \(C_{2}\), and \(C_{3} ?\) (i) Explain why $$ C_{n+1}=(0.77)^{4} \cdot C_{n}+15 $$ and \(c_{1}=15\) (j) From the recursion relation, assuming that the patient continues to take Tylenol pills at 4 -hour intervals, calculate \(C_{1}, C_{2}\), \(C_{3}, C_{4}, C_{5}\), and \(C_{6}\) (k) Does \(C_{n}\) increase indefinitely, or do you think that it converges? (1) By looking for fixing point of the recursion relation in (h), find the limit of \(C_{n}\) as \(n \rightarrow \infty\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.