/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 64 The population of a certain spec... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The population of a certain species of deer has been reduced drastically because of indiscriminate hunting. How will you determine its impact on the local ecosystem? a. To determine the effect of indiscriminate hunting on local ecosystem, environmental conditions should be determined. If a drastic change in environmental conditions is observed then, indiscriminate hunting of deer should be discouraged. b. The number of predators, their effect on plants they feed on, availability of nutrients in soil, and number of pests should be determined. If there is a drastic change in numbers, then indiscriminate hunting of deer should be discouraged. c. Determining the number of predators alone is sufficient to determine the impact of indiscriminate hunting on local ecosystem. If there is a drastic change in numbers, then indiscriminate hunting of deer should be discouraged. d. Determination of the availability of nutrients in soil helps in determining the impact of indiscriminate hunting on local ecosystem. If there is a drastic change in the availability, then indiscriminate hunting of deer should be discouraged.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Choice B is the best option because it covers multiple aspects of the ecosystem.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

Read the problem statement carefully. The problem discusses the impact of the decreased population of a deer species on the local ecosystem due to hunting.
02

Identify the Given Choices

List the multiple-choice answers provided to determine which information is relevant to assessing the ecosystem's impact.
03

Analyze Choice A

Examine choice A, which suggests evaluating environmental conditions. Consider whether this covers all necessary aspects, such as predators, plants, and soil health.
04

Analyze Choice B

Examine choice B, which involves determining the number of predators, the effect on plants, soil nutrients, and pests. This option covers a wide range of factors in the ecosystem.
05

Analyze Choice C

Examine choice C, which suggests that only the number of predators should be considered. This is limited and overlooks other ecosystem factors.
06

Analyze Choice D

Examine choice D, which focuses on soil nutrients. This is also limited compared to the broader approach in Choice B.
07

Compare and Select the Best Choice

Assess all the choices again and determine that Choice B is the most comprehensive, as it takes into account multiple aspects of the ecosystem, such as predators, plants, soil, and pests.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

ecosystem interactions
When trying to understand the impact of a reduced deer population on a local ecosystem, it's crucial to examine the interconnected relationships within that ecosystem. Ecosystem interactions refer to the multitude of ways in which different organisms and their environment affect one another. These interactions can be seen in:
  • Food Webs: The decline in deer population will affect the availability of food for predators.
  • Plant Growth: Decreased grazing pressure from deer might lead to an increase in certain plant species.
  • Secondary Consumers: Organisms that prey on or use deer as a resource may struggle, while others might thrive.

Each of these interactions plays a key role in maintaining the balance and health of the ecosystem. By examining these aspects, we can better understand how the ecosystem as a whole is affected by changes in the deer population.
predator-prey relationships
One of the most significant impacts of a reduced deer population is on predator-prey relationships. These relationships are critical in regulating population sizes and maintaining ecological balance.
Imagine the deer as a primary food source for predators like wolves or big cats. By reducing the deer population drastically, predators lose an essential part of their diet.
This scarcity can lead to:
  • Decreased Predator Numbers: With fewer deer, predator populations may decline due to starvation or migration.
  • Increased Competition: Predators may begin competing more fiercely for the remaining food sources.
  • Behavioral Changes: Predators may shift their hunting areas or target other prey species, causing further ecological imbalances.

Understanding these predator-prey dynamics is vital for assessing the overall health and stability of the ecosystem.
soil nutrient availability
Another essential aspect to consider is soil nutrient availability. Deer play an indirect but pivotal role in the cycling of nutrients within an ecosystem.
When deer graze, their activity helps in:
  • Plant Growth Regulation: By feeding on various plants, deer help maintain a balance in plant species, which in turn affects nutrient cycling.
  • Decomposition: Deer droppings add organic matter to the soil, providing essential nutrients.
  • Soil Disturbance: Their movement can help aerate the soil, aiding in nutrient diffusion.

With their numbers drastically reduced, these activities are minimized, potentially leading to:
  • Soil Depletion: Without regular grazing, certain plant species may dominate, depleting specific nutrients.
  • Poor Soil Health: Lack of organic matter from deer waste could result in poorer soil quality.

Assessment of soil nutrient availability helps in understanding the broader impact on plant health and, subsequently, on the entire ecosystem.
environmental impact assessment
Conducting an environmental impact assessment (EIA) is essential to comprehensively understand the effects of a reduced deer population on a local ecosystem.
An EIA involves:
  • Data Collection: Gathering information on various factors like species populations, plant diversity, soil health, and climate conditions.
  • Impact Analysis: Evaluating how these factors are interlinked and identifying changes resulting from hunting pressures.
  • Prediction: Making informed predictions about future ecological trends if current hunting practices continue.

This holistic approach ensures that all aspects of the ecosystem are considered, allowing for more informed conservation and management decisions. Through an EIA, we can:
  • Understand the full scope of hunting impacts.
  • Identify critical areas needing protection.
  • Develop strategies to mitigate negative consequences.

Such assessments are vital for maintaining ecological balance and ensuring the sustainability of local wildlife populations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What are possible consequences if there is a big oil spill in the middle of the ocean? How will it affect the biodiversity and the net primary productivity? What are some strategies to clean up this oil spill? a. Oil spills increase the amount of light and oxygen entering the ocean. The phytoplanktons may perish. Presence of oil would limit mobility of marine animals and may result in death. Some chemicals and bioremediation can help oil clean up. b. Oil spills increase the amount of light and oxygen entering the ocean. The phytoplanktons may increase. The mobility of marine animals increases. Biodiversity and, therefore, net primary productivity increases. Some chemicals and bioremediation can help oil clean up. c. Oil spills cover the surface of the ocean, reducing the amount of light entering the ocean. The marine organisms that can survive independent of light will not be affected. Some chemicals and bioremediation can help oil clean up. d. Oil spills cover the surface of the ocean, reducing the amount of light and oxygen entering the ocean. The phytoplankton may perish. Presence of oil would limit mobility of marine animals and may result in death. Some chemicals and bioremediation can help oil clean up

Is it possible to reverse global warming? What measures may help in reducing global climate change? a. It is possible to reverse global warming by reducing the usage of fossil fuels, using alternative fuels, using alternatives to CFC’s and using natural sources of energy. b. It is not possible to reverse global warming, as major climate changes have already been occurred and settled in the environment. Reducing fossil fuel usage, using natural sources of energy and alternative fuels may slow down global climate change. c. It is not possible to reverse global warming, as we are already witnessing changes in the environment, plants and animal behavior. Reducing fossil fuel usage and using natural sources of energy may slow down global climate change. d. It is possible to reverse global warming by working on new technologies that will help in preventing temperature changes worldwide. Using wind power and high efficiency natural gas generation will help in achieving this goal.

The extremely low precipitation of subtropical desert biomes might lead one to expect fire to be a major disturbance factor. However, fire is more common in the temperate grassland biome than in the sub tropic desert biome. Why is this? a. Due to higher net primary productivity, biomass in deserts is significantly more than in temperate grassland biomes. However, it is easier for fire to spread in grasslands as they are found in abundance. b. Due to lower net primary productivity, biomass in deserts is significantly less than in temperate grassland biomes. It is easier for fire to spread in grasslands as they are found in abundance. c. Due to lower net primary productivity, biomass in deserts is significantly less than in temperate grassland biomes. It is easier for fire to spread in grasslands as they have very low precipitation and high temperatures. d. Due to higher net primary productivity, biomass in deserts is significantly more than in temperate grassland biomes. However, it is easier for fire to spread in grasslands as they have very low precipitation and high temperatures.

Savannas are grasslands with scattered trees. Which statement is correct about savannas? a. They receive abundant rainfall. b. The temperatures are cold throughout the year. c. They have relatively long dry seasons. d. Savannas are dominated by fluctuations in temperature.

Which of the following are arranged from least inclusive to most inclusive? a. population>ecosystem>community > biosphere b. ecosystem < population < biosphere < community c. biosphere < ecosystem < community < population d. population < community < ecosystem < biosphere

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.