/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 How does the scientific meaning ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

How does the scientific meaning of 鈥渢heory鈥 differ from the common vernacular meaning? a. A scientific theory is a hypothesis that needs to be tested, whereas people often use theory to mean a simple guess. b. A scientific theory is a statement that has been proven correct, while people often use it to mean a statement that has not yet been verified. c. A scientific theory is a thoroughly tested set of explanations for a body of observations of nature, while people often use it to mean a guess or speculation. d. A scientific theory is a random guess, while people often use it to mean a statement that is somewhat based in fact.

Short Answer

Expert verified
c. A scientific theory is thoroughly tested, while common use means a guess or speculation.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Question

The question asks to differentiate between the scientific and common vernacular meanings of the word 'theory'.
02

Recall Definitions

Recall that a scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has been repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.
03

Contrast with Common Usage

In common vernacular, the word 'theory' is often used to mean a guess or speculation without substantial evidence.
04

Match to Options

Compare the above definitions with the given options: a. Incorrect: Hypotheses need to be tested, but a theory is already well-substantiated. b. Incorrect: A theory is not necessarily 'proven' but strongly supported by evidence. c. Correct: Reflects the thorough testing and evidence base of a scientific theory versus speculative use in common speech. d. Incorrect: Scientific theories are not random guesses.
05

Conclusion

The correct choice is c. A scientific theory is a thoroughly tested set of explanations for a body of observations of nature, while people often use it to mean a guess or speculation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

scientific theory
In scientific language, a theory is not just a guess or a hypothesis. It is a well-substantiated explanation for an aspect of the natural world. This explanation is based on a body of evidence that has been gathered and tested through repeated observation and experimentation.
For instance, the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection explains the diversity of life on Earth. It is supported by extensive evidence from various scientific disciplines, such as genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy.
Scientific theories are constantly tested and refined. They are not immutable and can be adjusted or even replaced when new evidence is found. This flexibility is a strength and a fundamental part of the scientific process.
This rigorous process is what distinguishes a scientific theory from a simple guess or an untested idea.
common vernacular
In everyday usage, the term 'theory' is often used very differently. People usually mean a guess, hypothesis, or speculation when they use the word 'theory' in common language.
For example, someone might say, 'I have a theory about why the traffic was bad today,' but this often means they have an untested idea based on personal experience or observation.
This usage significantly differs from the scientific meaning. In science, theories are comprehensive explanations supported by strong, consistent evidence. In common vernacular, 'theory' generally means an idea that lacks significant evidence and is more akin to a hypothesis.
Understanding this difference can help in recognizing the robustness of scientific theories and the casual nature of everyday 'theories.'
hypothesis testing
Before becoming a theory, a scientific idea often starts as a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a testable statement or prediction about the natural world.
Scientists design experiments to test hypotheses. Through careful observation and data collection, they determine whether the evidence supports or refutes the hypothesis. This process is known as hypothesis testing.
If a hypothesis is repeatedly tested and supported by strong evidence, it may eventually contribute to the development of a scientific theory. However, scientists remain open to new data and are willing to revise or abandon hypotheses if evidence dictates.
This rigorous approach ensures that scientific theories are based on reliable and reproducible evidence, distinguishing them from unsubstantiated guesses.
evidence-based science
Scientific knowledge relies heavily on evidence. Evidence-based science means that conclusions and theories are based on empirical, verifiable data gathered through observation and experimentation.
Scientists use various methods to collect evidence, including experiments, field observations, and data analysis. They also publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals, where other scientists can evaluate and replicate their work.
This emphasis on evidence ensures that scientific theories are robust and reliable. It allows for transparency and scrutiny, which are essential for scientific progress.
Unlike common vernacular guesses, scientific theories are not just ideas but well-supported explanations grounded in evidence. This makes science a powerful tool for understanding the world around us.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use adaptive radiation to explain the diversification of the finches Darwin observed in the Galapagos. a. The finches likely shared a common ancestor when they came to the island, but exhibited different traits. Each species of finch settled the island where its particular traits would be the most adaptive. b. The finches likely originated as one parent species, but over time mutations caused them to develop reproductive barriers and separate into different species. To reduce competition, the species then radiated out to inhabit different islands. c. The finches likely dispersed from one parent species, and natural selection based on different food sources in differing habitats led to adaptive changes, evidenced in the different beak shapes of the different species-each suited to a different food type. d. It is likely that a series of cataclysmic events caused an original finch species to diverge into the many finch species that inhabited the islands when Darwin observed them. The different species then radiated out to the different islands and adapted to the different conditions on each.

A biologist studies a population of voles for 20 years. During almost the entire research period, the population stays between 50 and 75 individuals. Additionally, fewer than half of the voles born do not survive to reproduce, due to predation and competition for food. Then, in one generation, 80% of the voles born live to reproduce. The population increases to 110 individuals. What inferences about food and predation can you make for the singular generation in which 80% of offspring survived? What prediction can you make about the genetic and phenotypic variation of future populations for this group of voles? a. Either there was fewer food available or the degree of predation increased. The future generations of this group of voles should evidence fewer genetic variation. b. Either there was fewer food available or the degree of predation increased. The future generations of this group of voles should evidence greater genetic variation. c. Either there was more food available or the degree of predation decreased. The future generations of this group of voles should evidence less genetic variation. d. Either there was more food available or the degree of predation decreased. The future generations of this group of voles should evidence greater genetic variation.

Which component of speciation would be least likely to be a part of punctuated equilibrium? a. a division in populations b. a change in environmental conditions c. ongoing gene flow d. a number of mutations occuring at once

The upper forelimbs of humans and cats have fairly similar structures. In contrast, the upper forelimbs of whales (their flippers) have bones with a different shape and proportion from both cats and humans. Interestingly, genetic data suggests that all three organisms have a common ancestor from about the same point in time. What is a likely explanation for these data? a. Cats and humans are more closely related to each other than either are to whales. b. The shape of the whale forelimb arose a result of disadvantageous mutations c. The whale flipper is an adaptive characteristic unique to its water environment. d. The whale flipper is a vestigial structure

Which is the best definition of adaptation? a. a trait or behavior that aids an organism鈥檚 survival and reproduction b. a heritable trait or behavior that aids an organism鈥檚 survival and reproduction c. a trait or behavior that aids a population鈥檚 survival and reproduction d. a heritable trait or behavior that aids a population鈥檚 survival and reproduction

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.