/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Damping in rubber bands. Make a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Damping in rubber bands. Make a "rubber rope" two or three feet long by tying together some rubber bands cut open to form a single strand. Try to verify that the phase velocity for longitudinal waves is greater (if it is) than that for transverse waves. You will find the longitudinal modes are highly damped. Hold one of the bands against your moistened lips. Suddenly stretch it. Wait. Suddenly relax it. What, if anything, do the results of this experiment tell you about damping? Why are the longitudinal modes damped so much more than the transverse ones? To put it differently, how can you get decent transverse oscillations with such great damping?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Longitudinal waves experience greater damping due to internal friction. Transverse waves sustain oscillations with less damping.

Step by step solution

01

Setting Up the Experiment

Create a rubber rope by cutting open several rubber bands and tying them together to form a single long strand. Ensure the rope is around 2-3 feet in length for ease of use during the experiment.
02

Observing the Longitudinal Wave

Hold one end of the rope firmly and apply a sudden stretch to introduce a longitudinal wave. Observe the behavior of the wave, particularly noting how rapidly the amplitude of this wave decreases, indicating the level of damping.
03

Observing the Transverse Wave

Create a transverse wave by flicking the rope sideways. Observe how this wave travels along the rubber rope, and compare its rate of damping with the longitudinal wave. Pay attention to how the transverse wave maintains its form compared to the longitudinal wave.
04

Analyzing Damping in Both Modes

Analyze your observations. The rapid damping of the longitudinal waves is due to the internal friction and energy loss as the segments of the rubber move through and deform against each other. The transverse waves are less damped because the motion doesn't involve as much internal deformation, so less energy is lost.
05

Answering the Experiment Questions

The results demonstrate that damping is much higher in longitudinal waves due to greater internal friction and energy loss. This excessive damping explains why longitudinal modes in rubber bands are less pronounced compared to transverse modes, which maintain oscillations with less energy loss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Longitudinal Waves
In the context of the rubber band experiment, a longitudinal wave moves along the direction of the rope's stretch. These types of waves involve compressions and rarefactions along the medium; imagine how a slinky looks when you push and pull it along its length.

Observing the creation of a longitudinal wave in the rubber rope demonstrates how quickly these waves are damped due to internal factors. When the rope is stretched suddenly, a wave starts traveling along it, but notice how rapidly it becomes hard to see. This rapid reduction in wave amplitude is known as damping, which occurs when energy from the wave is dissipated, often due to internal friction in the material from which the wave is traveling.

The high level of damping observed in longitudinal waves is due to the fact that energy is lost primarily through the internal friction between rubber molecules. This friction arises when the molecules rub against each other as they get crowded (compression) and pulled apart (rarefaction), leading to energy loss.
Transverse Waves
Transverse waves, on the other hand, travel perpendicular to the direction of the wave motion. You can see transverse waves in action by flicking a rubber rope sideways. While longitudinal waves are heavily damped, transverse waves tend to maintain their form better during the same experiment.

This is because the motion of transverse waves involves less internal deformation compared to longitudinal waves. In transverse waves, the movement is side to side, rather than compressing and stretching the rubber material itself.

Because transverse waves don't compress the material, they don't have to work against strong internal forces like in longitudinal waves. As a result, they experience less internal friction, meaning they lose less energy and can travel for a longer time without the wave disappearing quickly. This allows transverse oscillations to remain visible and more defined.
Internal Friction
A significant factor in the damping of waves is internal friction within the material. Internal friction occurs when molecules slide past each other within a medium, resulting in energy being transformed into heat.

In the context of the rubber rope experiment, when different sections of the rope move, they create this internal friction. This friction is much higher when dealing with longitudinal waves since the rubber bands undergo compressing and extension, which requires additional movement of molecules against one another.

In contrast, for transverse movements, the lateral displacements involve less contact between molecules moving past each other, reducing the frictional resistance considerably. Hence, the energy loss due to internal friction is less for transverse waves than for longitudinal ones.
Energy Loss
Energy loss in waves refers to how the energy of the wave is diminished as it travels through a medium. This can happen due to several factors, including internal friction, which has already been discussed.

In both longitudinal and transverse waves, energy is continuously being transformed, typically into thermal energy due to friction, which leads to the diminishing of wave amplitude. However, in this experiment with rubber ropes, you find the energy loss more significant in longitudinal waves.

For longitudinal waves, energy loss is rapid because more energy is transferred out of the wave's mechanical movement into molecular friction. On the flip side, transverse waves maintain more of their energy because their side-to-side motion limits the amount of contact and friction compared to longitudinal movements. This stark difference in energy retention explains why transverse oscillations are better sustained compared to their longitudinal counterparts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sing a steady note into a cardboard mailing tube, with the tube held tight against your mouth so no air leaks around the edges. Vary the pitch to find the resonances. (They are not exactly where the free modes are that you hear when you tap the tube on your head. Your mouth and throat change the effective length at that end.) Sing a steady note not at a resonance. Suddenly remove the tube while continuing to sing. The change of impedance should be noticeable. Now sing at a resonance. Notice the markedly different feeling in your throat. The load is not a purely resistive load at resonance but rather is largely reactive. Now find a large jar or vase or bucket. (A large glass vase or large styrofoam or plastic jar or bucket will work very well.) Find a strong resonance by searching with your singing voice. Sing as loudly as you can at the resonance, with your mouth and throat closely coupled to the resonating system. If there were no radiation loss or other resistive loss, the load on your singing apparatus would be a purely reactive load. That is, as much energy would flow back into your throat on any one cycle as left it (during another part of the cycle). As it is, the feeling in your throat is remarkably different from that when you sing into an open medium. You will find that you have difficulty in controlling the pitch. The pitch "wobbles" because you are used to a resistive load and are experiencing a reactive one.

Sound velocity in air, helium, and natural gas. Get an ordinary whistle. Blow it and remember the pitch. Now connect the whistle to a helium bottle (avallable in any laboratory or physics department) and blow the whistle using helium. What is the pitch now? Measure experimentally the piteh ratio for helium as compared to air. The easiest method is to recognize the pitches and then use a table of frequencies versus pitch (found in the Handbook of Physics and Chemistry, or see Home Exp. 2.6). Show that the theoretically expected pitch ratio is about 3 to 1 . Experimentally you may only get about 2.5. Why is that? Can you improve the experiment? How does the sound wavelength in the whistle compare in the two eases of helium and air? Instead of helium or air, use natural gas, connecting the whistle through a hose to the gas outlet for a gas stove or Bunsen burner. What is the pitch ratio? What can you learn about the molecular properties of the gas by measuring the pitch ratio for the gas and air?

For this experiment you need an incandescent lamp (either clear or frosted glass envelope), a candle, two slabs of paraffin wax ("household wax" used to seal glasses of jellies, jams, and preserves), and a piece of aluminum foil. The candle is yo? standard. We assume that your candle is close to a standard candle and thus emits 1 candlepower, about 20 milliwatts of visible radiation. The lamp is the unknown. Its total power is known (marked on the bulb). Measure its visible output by comparing it with the candle as follows. Sandwich the aluminum foil between the two slabs of paraffin. Hold the paraffin sandwich near the eandle; notice the brightness of the paraffin slab nearer the candle and the darkness of the slab farther from the candle. Hold it near the lamp. Now (at night, with only the candle and lamp on) hold the paraffin detector between the lamp and the candle with one slab facing each light source. Vary the location until the two slabs appear equally bright. Measure the distances. The rest is arithmetic. (Use the inverse-square law.) Give the visible output of the lamp in candlepower and in visible watts, assuming your candle is "standard." Give the efficiency of the bulb. With a slightly more sophisticated arrangement, you should be able to measure the illumination of the sun in visible watts \(/ \mathrm{cm}^{2}\) or (taking \(\left.1 \mathrm{~cd} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}=20 \mathrm{mw} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\right\rangle\) in candles per square \(\mathrm{cm}\). You may have a problem with background light coming from neither the sun nor from your standard light bulb. It helps to have a strong light bulb, perhaps 200 watts. Perhaps you need a mailing tube collimator, or a cardboard carton with suitable holes, or a dark cloth somewhere. Calibrate the light bulb in candles as described above. Find the distance of the bulb from the paraffin that gives equal illumination to that of the sun. From the geometry, you can calculate the flux from the bulb in \(\mathrm{cd} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\) and thus calculate the illumination of the sun in \(\mathrm{cd} / \mathrm{cm}^{2}\)

Coaxial transmission line. Show that the capacitance per unit length, \(\mathrm{C} / a\), for a coaxial transmission line with inner conductor of radius \(\mathrm{r}_{1}\) and outer conductor of radius \(r_{2}\) and with vacuum between the inner and outer cylindrical conductors is given (in esu, i.e., \(\mathrm{cm}\) of capacitance per \(\mathrm{cm}\) of length along the axis) by $$ \frac{C}{a}=\frac{1}{2 \ln \left(r_{2} / r_{1}\right)} $$ Show that the self-inductance per unit length, \(L / a\), is given (in esu) by $$ \frac{L}{a}=\frac{2}{c^{2}} \ln \frac{r_{2}}{r_{1}} $$ To obtain \(C / a\), use \(Q=C V\) and Gauss's law (Vol. II, Sec, 3.5). To obtain \(L / a\), use \(L=(1 / c) \Phi / I\), where \(\Phi\) is the magnetic flux produced by a current \(I\) [Vol. II, Sec. \(7.8\), Eqs. (7.53) and 7.54)].

Get an ordinary frosted bulb (of any wattage) and also a "soft white" bulb of the same wattage and bulb diameter. Turn them on and look. Notice the "bright core" of projected light for the frosted bulb. The soft white bulb is much more uniform. The frosted bulb therefore has a smaller "effective" surface than the soft white bulb. Since their power is the same, they presumably have the same total light output. The frosted bulb must therefore be brighter over the smaller surface of its bright core. Look at the central region of each lit bulb through a hole between your curled fingers, with your hand held at constant distance from your eye so that a constant solid angle is admitted. Which bulb is brighter (at the center)? Measure the diameter of the projected area of the bright core of the frosted bulb by holding a ruler against it. (You may need to reduce the brightness by looking through partially crossed polaroids from your optics kit.) Calculate a predicted ratio of surface brightnesses for the two bulbs, taking as a model an "effective sphere" for the frosted bulb with diameter equal to the diameter of the projected bright core. Now measure the ratio of surface brightnesses as follows. Put each bulb behind a cardboard carton (or something) with a hole in the cardboard that reveals only the central region of each bulb. Make the two holes the same size. Locate the bulbs so that they are several feet apart and shining at each other through the holes. Use the paraffin-sandwich technique described in Home Exp. \(4.24\) to measure the ratio of surface brightnesses of the central regions of the two bulbs. How does your result compare with your calculation based on the "effective sphere" model? Finally, break the bulbs to see how their frostings differ. (Wrap a bulb in a towel before breaking it!) If this seems too wasteful of bulbs and money, you may take our word for it that the ordinary frosted bulbs we have broken open are slightly rough on the inner surface, which could be achieved by etching with acid or by sandblasting. The soft-white bulbs are coated with white powder (undoubtedly magnesium oxide). The powder wipes off at the touch of a finger, leaving a clear envelope. If you do break the bulb, save the largest hemispherical piece. It makes a very good "planoconvex" lens when partially filled with liquid. (To get a large piece, break the bulb by tapping at the neck.) You can use it to measure the indexes of refraction of water and mineral oil.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.