/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 Radiation Overdose. If a person'... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Radiation Overdose. If a person's entire body is exposed to \(5.0 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg}\) of \(\mathrm{x}\) rays, death usually follows within a few days. (a) Express this lethal radiation dose in Gy, rad, Sv, and rem. (b) How much total energy does a \(70.0 \mathrm{~kg}\) person absorb from such a dose? (c) If the \(5.0 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg}\) came from a beam of protons instead of \(\mathrm{x}\) rays, what would be the answers to parts (a) and (b)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The lethal x-ray dose is equal to 5.0 Gy, 500 rad, 5.0 Sv, and 500 rem. A 70 kg person would absorb 350 J of energy from this dose. If the radiation came from a proton beam instead of x-rays, the dose would be 5.0 Gy, 500 rad, 10.0 Sv, and 1000 rem, and the person would still absorb 350 J.

Step by step solution

01

Convert the dose into Gy

Radiation exposure is usually expressed in gray units (Gy). 1 Gy is equivalent to 1 Joule per Kilogram (J/kg). Therefore, the given dose of \(5.0 J/kg\) is the same as \(5.0 Gy\).
02

Convert the dose into rad

Next, we need to convert the dose into rads. 1 rad is equivalent to \(0.01 Gy\). Therefore, to convert \(5.0 Gy\) into rads, we multiply by 100 which gives us 500 rad.
03

Convert the dose into Sv and rem

At this point, since X-rays is given, we will assume the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1. This means that 1 Gray (Gy) is equal to 1 Sv and 1 rad is equal to 1 rem. Therefore, the equivalent of \(5.0 Gy\) in Sieverts (Sv) is \(5.0 Sv\) and in rems is 500 rem.
04

Calculate the total energy absorbed by a 70.0 kg person

To calculate the total energy absorbed by a \(70.0 kg\) person, we multiply the dose \(5.0 J/kg\) by the person's mass. That yields \(5.0 J/kg \times 70.0 kg = 350 J\).
05

Calculate the dose from a proton beam

If the radiation came from a beam of protons instead of x-rays, here we would consider that the RBE of protons is 2. Therefore, the value in Gy remains \(5.0 Gy\) but in Sv would be \(5.0 Gy \times 2 = 10.0 Sv\). Similarly, the value in rad stays 500 rad, but when converted to rem, it now becomes \(500 rad \times 2 = 1000 rem\).
06

Calculate the total energy absorbed from a proton beam

The energy absorbed from a proton beam would be the same, \(350 J\), because this is dependent on the mass of the person and the energy dosage which hasn’t changed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Gray (Gy)
Gray, abbreviated as Gy, is the standard unit used to measure the absorbed dose of radiation by an object. It describes the amount of energy from radiation that is absorbed per kilogram of matter. One Gray equals one joule of radiation energy absorbed by one kilogram of tissue.
This makes it a direct measurement of the energy deposited in a certain mass. For instance, if a person absorbs a dose of 5.0 joules per kilogram from X-rays, it is expressed as a dose of 5.0 Gy.
  • A higher Gray value indicates more radiation energy absorbed, and potentially more harm to biological tissues.
  • This unit is internationally recognized and provides a straightforward way to assess radiation exposure related to health risks.
Sievert (Sv)
The Sievert, written as Sv, is a unit that measures the health effect of low levels of ionizing radiation on the human body. It's particularly important because not all types of radiation have the same biological effect, even if the dose in Gray is the same.
  • Sievert takes into account the type of radiation and its relative biological effectiveness (RBE). X-rays, for example, typically have an RBE of 1, meaning the biological impact in Sv is numerically equal to the dose in Gy.
  • In practical applications, health physics uses Sievert to estimate the potential biological effect of different kinds of radiation, translating absorbed dose into potential health risk.
  • For a lethal dose from X-rays of 5.0 Gy, the equivalent dose would also be 5.0 Sv, reflecting the same numerical relationship due to the RBE of 1 for X-rays.
rad and rem conversion
Conversion between rad and rem units is important when working with radiation doses, especially in contexts where US customary units are still used. While Gray and Sievert are the SI units, rad and rem provide similar measures in a different magnitude.
  • The rad is a measure of absorbed dose, originally used in the United States, where 1 rad equals 0.01 Gy. Therefore, to convert from Gray to rad, you multiply the dose value by 100.
  • The rem is similar to the Sievert, providing a measure for the biological effect of absorbed radiation. Just like 1 Gy equals 1 Sv for X-rays, 1 rad equals 1 rem in similar situations.
  • Following the earlier example, 5.0 Gy would convert to 500 rad, and because the RBE is 1, it also converts to 500 rem. This consistency helps simplify international and inter-system communication about radiation doses.
relative biological effectiveness (RBE)
Relative Biological Effectiveness, or RBE, is a factor that helps us understand how different types of radiation affect biological tissues. Different radiations vary in their capacity to cause biological harm.
  • RBE is used to scale the absorbed dose (in Gy) to more accurately reflect the biological damage (in Sv) caused by different types of radiation.
  • For instance, if X-rays and gamma rays have an RBE of 1, they cause damage in direct proportion to the absorbed energy. However, alpha particles, which carry more mass, can have a higher RBE, causing more biological damage per unit of absorbed energy.
  • In scenarios involving protons with an RBE of 2, a dose of 5.0 Gy would correspond to 10.0 Sv. This highlights how RBE influences health risk estimates from radiation exposure and is crucial for radiation protection and therapy applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which reaction produces \({ }^{131} \mathrm{Te}\) in the nuclear reactor? (a) \({ }^{130} \mathrm{Te}+\mathrm{n} \rightarrow{ }^{131} \mathrm{Te} ;\) (b) \({ }^{130} \mathrm{I}+\mathrm{n} \rightarrow{ }^{131} \mathrm{Te} ;\) (c) \({ }^{132} \mathrm{Te}+\mathrm{n} \rightarrow{ }^{131} \mathrm{Te}\) (d) \({ }^{132} \mathrm{I}+\mathrm{n} \rightarrow{ }^{131} \mathrm{Te}\).

We Are Stardust. In 1952 spectral lines of the element technetium-99 \(\left({ }^{99} \mathrm{Tc}\right)\) were discovered in a red giant star. Red giants are very old stars, often around 10 billion years old, and near the end of their lives. Technetium has no stable isotopes, and the half-life of \({ }^{99} \mathrm{Tc}\) is 200,000 years. (a) For how many half-lives has the \({ }^{99} \mathrm{Tc}\) been in the red giant star if its age is 10 billion years? (b) What fraction of the original \({ }^{99} \mathrm{Tc}\) would be left at the end of that time? This discovery was extremely important because it provided convincing evidence for the theory (now essentially known to be true) that most of the atoms heavier than hydrogen and helium were made inside of stars by thermonuclear fusion and other nuclear processes. If the \({ }^{99} \mathrm{Tc}\) had been part of the star since it was born, the amount remaining after 10 billion years would have been so minute that it would not have been detectable. This knowledge is what led the late astronomer Carl Sagan to proclaim that "we are stardust."

Measurements on a certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases from 8318 decays/min to 3091 decays/min in 4.00 days. What is the half-life of this isotope?

The atomic mass of \({ }_{12}^{25} \mathrm{Mg}\) is \(24.985837 \mathrm{u},\) and the atomic mass of \({ }_{13}^{25} \mathrm{Al}\) is \(24.990428 \mathrm{u}\). (a) Which of these nuclei will decay into the other? (b) What type of decay will occur? Explain how you determined this. (c) How much energy (in MeV) is released in the decay?

The fusion reactions in the sun produce \(26.73 \mathrm{MeV}\) per alpha particle created. Each of these reactions produces two neutrinos. In total, the sun's power is about \(3.8 \times 10^{26} \mathrm{~W}\). (a) Estimate how many solar fusion reactions take place every second. (b) Estimate the number of neutrinos that leave the sun each second. (c) The distance between the earth and the sun is 150 million \(\mathrm{km},\) and the radius of the earth is \(6370 \mathrm{~km} .\) Using these figures, estimate the number of solar neutrinos that encounter the earth each second. (d) How many square centimeters does the earth present to the sun? (e) Divide your answer in part (c) by your answer in part (d) to obtain an estimate of the number of solar neutrinos that pass through every square centimeter on earth every second.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.